= RW Dra Sergey Nikolaevich Blazhko (November - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rw dra sergey nikolaevich blazhko november 5 17 1870
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

= RW Dra Sergey Nikolaevich Blazhko (November - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

= RW Dra Sergey Nikolaevich Blazhko (November 5(17), 1870 - February 11, 1956, Moscow) The Blazhko effect: What is it? Blazhko RR Lyrae stars in the Kepler field Great variety of light curve


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Сергей Николаевич Блажко

Sergey Nikolaevich Blazhko

(November 5(17), 1870 - February 11, 1956, Moscow)

= RW Dra

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Blazhko effect: What is it?

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Great variety of light curve modulation period, strength and shape is seen in this sample.

Blazhko RR Lyrae stars in the Kepler field

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Kepler telescope

Layout of the 42 CCDs

A region of the extended solar neighborhood in the Cygnus-Lyra regions along the Orion arm of our galaxy has been chosen.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

COnvection ROtation Transits

« Petite » mission CNES (MO) + Belgique + Allemagne + Autriche + Espagne + Brésil+ ESA 3ème mission PROTEUS (minisat) Double programme : astérosismologie ET recherche de planètes extrasolaires Lancement 27 décembre 2006 : Soyouz Starsem 2b depuis Baïkonour Orbite polaire circulaire à 896 km d’altitude Durée nominale : 2.5 ans

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Kolenberg et al. 2011 MNRAS 411, 878

Time resolution effect on frequency detection

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Examples of Blazhko stars

http://www.univie.ac.at/tops/blazhko/Project.html

Katrien Kolenberg

RR Lyr PB=39 d PB/P=70

Elisabeth Guggenberger

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RR Lyr PB=39 d PB/P=70

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Courbe de lumière montrant 2 cycles de pulsations de l’étoile RR Lyrae V 1127 Aql évoluant au cours du temps (en bleu), on observe parfaitement l’effet Blazhko. Au cours des 400 cycles (en rouge) observés par le satellite CoRoT, on distingue à la fois une modulation de l’amplitude (sur l’axe vertical des ordonnées), et une modulation de la période de pulsation (sur l’axe horizontal des abscisses).

V1127 Aql PB=27 d PB/P=76

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Blazhko RR Lyrae star MW Lyr

Jurcsik, J., Sódor, Á., Hurta, Zs., Váradi, M., Szeidl, B., Smith, H. A., Henden, A., Dékány, I., Nagy, I., Posztobányi, K., Szing, A., Vida, K., Vityi, N. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 164 - http://konkoly.hu/24/publications/

MW Lyr PB=17 d PB/P=42

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The shortest modulation period Blazhko RR Lyrae star: SS Cnc

  • J. Jurcsik, B. Szeidl, Á. Sódor, I. Dékány, Zs. Hurta, K. Posztobányi, K. Vida, M. Váradi, and A. Szing

2006, AJ, 132, 61 - http://konkoly.hu/24/publications/ Sergey Nikolaevich Blazhko

SS Cnc PB=5.3 d PB/P=14

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Why do some stars do it and others don‘t?

Repeating cycles Blazhko modulation

[mag] [mag]

50%

  • f RR Lyrae

50%

  • f RR Lyrae
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Different types of RR Lyrae

Wils D.M.

F = 1H 1O = 2H 2O = 3H 3O = 4H 4O = 5H 5O = 6H

F 1O DM 2O

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

ASAS

OGLE-II and OGLE-III fields in the LMC

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Spatial distribution of RR Lyrae stars in the LMC

slide-19
SLIDE 19

RRab, RRa and RRb stars

The new nomenclature of RR Lyrae stars:

  • RR0 = RRab, 70%, fundamental mode pulsator;
  • RR1 = RRc, 20%, first overtone pulsator;
  • RR01 = RRd, 5%, double-mode pulsator F/1O;
  • RR2 = RRe, 5%, second overtone pulsator;
  • RR12 = double-mode pulsator 1O/2O;
  • RR3 = third overtone pulsator;
  • RR23 = double-mode pulsator 2O/3O;
  • RR4 = fourth overtone pulsator;
  • RR34 = double-mode pulsator 3O/4O;
  • RR5 = fifth overtone pulsator;

etc.

The classification of S.I. Bailey (1902)

based on the shape of light curves:

  • RRa: increase of light very rapid. Decrease

rapid, but much less rapid than the increase;

  • RRb: increase of light moderately rapid.

Decrease is relatively slow and continues;

  • RRc: low-amplitude and nearly sinusoidal

light curves;

RRa and RRb merged to ”ab” because the gradual transition between them made them almost undistinguishable.
  • RRab = RRa + RRb: large amplitude and

non-sinusoidal light curve;

a new type:
  • RRd: a rare type; double-mode pulsator.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Igor Soszynski

  • U. Warsaw, Poland
slide-21
SLIDE 21

RRab, RRa and RRb stars

The Bailey diagram:

RRa RRb

0.625

P=0.625 day RRa RRb

RR Lyr: P=0.57 day
slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Blazhko effect

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The explanation of the Blazhko effect???

Until today, after over 100 years of research, there were more than 10 explanations proposed but none is satisfactory.

Sergey Nikolaevich Blazhko

What is the correct explanation?...

(K. Kolenberg)

Today the Blazhko effect represents an ongoing challenge in variable-star research.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1936

The first explanation of the Blazhko effect by Miss H. A. Kluyver

slide-25
SLIDE 25

1) a 2:1 resonance between the fundamental radial mode and the second overtone (Kluyver 1936;Walraven 1955; Borkowski 1980) 2) The changing aspect of a magnetic oblique rotator-pulsator (Balazs-Detre 1959; Balazs-Detre & Detre 1962; Christy1966; Cousens 1983; Shibahashi 2000) 3) non-adiabatic splitting of a radial mode (Ledoux 1963) 4) Tides in a binary system (Fitch 1967) 5) a resonance between a radial mode and an unobservable nonradial mode (Vandakurov1967; Cox 1993; Kovacs 1995) 6) a resonance between a radial mode and an observable nonradial mode (Fahlman 1971; Cox 1993;Kovacs 1995;Van Hoolst et al. 1998; Nowakowski & Dziembowski 2003; Dziembowski & Mizerski 2004) 7) Pairing of binary companions of RR Lyrae types ab and c (Kinman & Carretta 1992) 8) mode mixing as a Blazhko mechanism (Clement et al. 1997; Clementini et al. 2004) 9) a 2:1 resonance between the fundamental radial mode and the third overtone (Borkowski 1980;Moskalik 1986; Goranskii 1989) 10) Binary light-time effects (Jurcsik et al. 2002) 11) Changes in the structure of the outer convective zone, due to an irregular variation of the magnetic field (Stothers 2006) 12) Fundamental mode destabilized by a 9:2 resonant interaction with the 9th overtone (Buchler & Kollath 2011)

time

full references are given by Stothers 2006 ApJ 652, 643 & Smolec et al. 2011 MNRAS 414, 2950
slide-26
SLIDE 26

From Jean-François Le Borgne - La Rochelle 2006

Interprétations de l'effet Blazhko : Modèles magnétiques

(K. Kolenberg)

 Ces modèles supposent que ces étoiles ont un champ magnétique incliné par rapport à l'axe de rotation (cf. modèles de rotateur

  • blique des étoiles Ap). Le mode fondamental radial est déformé

pour donner une composante quadripôle dont l'axe coïncide avec l'axe magnétique.  La période Blazhko est supposée être égale à la période de la rotation de l'étoile.  Un champ magnétique 1kG serait nécessaire pour qu'une modulation d'amplitude soit observable.  Un champ de 1.5kG a été observé par certains

  • bservateurs mais il n’a pas été confirmé par

d'autres (rien au dessus de 130 G).

(see Kolenberg & Bagnulo 2009 A&A 498, 543)
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary of explanations for the Blazhko effect

by Katrien Kolenberg Until 2006, very simplified picture!

slide-28
SLIDE 28

A new fact that any model must explain today:

Continuous and accurate observations

  • f the CoRoT and Kepler space telescopes

revealed many new small frequencies in addition to the usual RR Lyrae pattern (fundamental and Blazhko periods).

Blazhko star

KIC 7671081 = V450 Lyr KIC 3866709 = V715 Cyg

non-Blazhko star

These small frequencies are irregular from one cycle to the other.

From Jon Jenkins, Kepler Co-Investigator, New York Times story (2011 Jan 30)
slide-29
SLIDE 29

The Blazhko effect

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Location of RRab Blazhko stars in the HRD

Blazhko star non Blazhko star Gillet 2013 A&A FOBE First Overtone Blue Edge FBE Fundamental Blue Edge FORE First Overtone Red Edge FRE Fundamental Red Edge

Pietrynski, G., Thompson, I. B., Gieren, W., et al. 2010, Nature, 468, 542

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The key process: the first overtone shock

Fokin & Gillet 1997 A&A 325, 1013

RR Lyr

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Fokin & Gillet 1997 A&A 325, 1013

Collision of shocks: s4+s3 & s3’

Formation region of s3’ Formation region of s3 Formation region of s1 Formation region of s4

The main shock

slide-33
SLIDE 33

RR Lyr

Collision of shocks: s4+s3 & s3’

Fokin & Gillet 1997 A&A 325, 1013

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The key process: the first overtone shock s3’

 There are 5 shock waves in RR Lyr during a pulsation cycle.

  • s4 : accumulated weak compression
waves (buzz waves) at the sonic point during the beginning of the atmospheric compression produce shock s4.
  • s3 : associated with the stop of the
hydrogen recombination front near the phase of maximum expansion.
  • s3’ : might be generated by the
perturbation of the fundamental mode by the transient first
  • vertone?
  • s2 : produced by the κ-mechanism
that occurs in helium subphotospheric layers.
  • s1 : produced by the κ-mechanism
that occurs in hydrogen subphotospheric layers.

Fokin & Gillet 1997 A&A 325, 1013

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Fokin & Gillet 1997 A&A 325, 1013

The velocity of s3’ is weak: Mach number ∼ 2.5

Mach number =20

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

The second required process: the decrease of the average effective temperature

Amplitude = 6915 – 6850 = 65 K MW Lyr PB=17 d PB/P=42

How to explain the variation in average effective temperature <Teff>?

Blazhko maximum

slide-38
SLIDE 38

u F h u C

R

ρ + + ≡

2 2

2 1

Ratio of the emergent radiative flux FRN to the total energy of the shock wave C2

2 4 6 Mach number

R enthalpy h I x tr k

E W E E E E C + + + + + ≡

      

2

Fadeyev & Gillet 2001 A&A 368, 901

When the shock velocity increases, its radiative losses increase rapidly.

cste u F h u u F h u

R R

= + + = + +

2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1

2 1 2 1 ρ ρ

Rankine-Hugoniot equation for energy: Definition:

ρ ρ γ p p 1 1 −

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Starting from the Rankine-Hugoniot equation for energy and assuming that the shock is isotherm (very strong shock), the radiative flux Fr produced by the shock is where ρ1 is the density of the unperturbed gas in front of the shock. Assuming that the shock remains close to the photosphere, the ratio between the shock luminosity Ls and the photospheric luminosity L* writes approximately

The shock luminosity Ls versus the photospheric luminosity L*

with ρ1 = 10-9g/cm3 and Teff = 7000 K, Ls ∼ L* if the shock front velocity is much larger than 65 km/s. In fact, with realistic radiative shock waves, the shock luminosity should only reach a fraction of the photospheric luminosity: 4% => 1% of the Teff => 65 K during half of the 70 pulsation cycles of the Blazhko period for RR Lyr => about 2K each pulsation period !

Gillet 2013 A&A

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Variation of the stellar parameters

<R> <log g> <MV> <L> <Teff> A(V) <P> <V>

slide-41
SLIDE 41

<<

<∆Tteff> ≅ 50 K or 1%

< >

non Blazhko RRab stars non Blazhko RRc stars RRc and RRab Blazhko stars

Part of the I n s t a b i l i t y s t r i p

Blazhko maximum Blazhko minimum

Pmax; <Teff max>; Shock min Pmin; <Teff min>; Shock max

Re-synchronization phase Shock amplification phase Photospheric de-synchronisation New synchronization

where First overtone & fundamental modes are excited

Pulsation cycle: ∆Tteff ≅ 2500-2800 K or 40% Blazhko cycle: <∆Tteff> ≅ 50 K or 1%

not to scale Gillet 2013 A&A

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Gillet 2013 A&A

Amplitude Amplitude

the amplitude

  • f the

light curve is connected with the amplitude

  • f the

main shock wave

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Gillet 2013 A&A

slide-44
SLIDE 44

<<

<∆Tteff> ≅ 50 K or 1%

< >

non Blazhko RRab stars non Blazhko RRc stars RRc and RRab Blazhko stars

Part of the I n s t a b i l i t y s t r i p

Blazhko maximum Blazhko minimum

Pmax; <Teff max>; Shock min Pmin; <Teff min>; Shock max

Re-synchronization phase Shock amplification phase Photospheric de-synchronisation New synchronization

where First overtone & fundamental modes are excited

Pulsation cycle: ∆Tteff ≅ 2500-2800 K or 40% Blazhko cycle: <∆Tteff> ≅ 50 K or 1%

not to scale Gillet 2013 A&A

slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Buchler & Kolláth (2011) used the amplitude equation formalism to study the 9:2 resonant interaction. They limited their amplitude equations to the coupling between the 9th overtone and the fundamental mode, although a resonance with any other higher mode is possible.

Buchler & Kolláth 2011 ApJ 731, 24 tent-like shape Gillet 2013 A&A

a strange attractor

 relative phase: Γ = 2φb − 9φa

A dozen of free parameters!

slide-47
SLIDE 47

different D E T E R M I N I S T I C

phase space set time series

R A N D O M

same first order correlations, higher orders scrambled

low dimension high dimension (∞)

X(n+1) X(n) X(n+1) X(n)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

RR Lyr HeII 4686 RR Lyr HeI 5875

Gillet, Fabas, Lèbre, 2013, A&A
  • In general, emission in helium lines is not present in

RR Lyrae stars.

  • It is only observed in Blazhko stars and solely at the

Blazhko maximum (Preston 2009, 2011). So far, the

  • bservation of He I emission lines has been reported

in 10 RRab stars, very weak He II emission was detected in 3 of them.

  • No detection was made in RRc-type stars (as for

hydrogen).  Thus, helium emission is quite exceptional, unlike hydrogen emission, which is common in RRab.

  • Helium is produced in the wake of the main shock

wave, but only when the temperature of the wake is sufficiently high.

  • This requires the main shock to reach

⇒ a critical Mach number MHe I to produce He I in emission and then to exceed ⇒a second higher threshold Mach number MHe II for He II.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

0.625

RRc

RRab non-Blazhko

RRab Blazhko

0.625

Blazhko stars have systematically larger amplitude and shorter period than regular RR Lyrae stars

slide-50
SLIDE 50 From B. Szeid (1988) and Thesis Elisabeth Guggenberger

Blazhko stars induce a large dispersion at lower amplitudes

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Long-term variations

slide-52
SLIDE 52

The Blazhko effect of the strongly modulated target ASAS 212034+1837.2 of Konkoly Blazhko Survey II in 2007 and 2009. The highest- and lowest-amplitude Blazhko phases are marked with different colours. The strength of the modulation changed during the nearly two years elapsed between their two observing seasons.

  • A. Sodor, J. Jurcsik, L. Molnar, B. Szeidl, Zs. Hurta, G. A. Bakos, et al. 2012 Progress in Solar/Stellar Physics with Helio- and Asteroseismology Conference
Proceeding, Vol. 462. Edited by H. Shibahashi, M. Takata, and A.E. Lynas-Gray. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, page 228

Changes in the intensity of the modulation during two years!

slide-53
SLIDE 53

The Blazhko star CZ Lac in 2004 and 2005

slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55

GEOS RR-Lyr database

Le Borgne, J.-F., Klotz, A. 2009, GEOS Note Circulaire NC 1105
slide-56
SLIDE 56 summer 2010 summer 2009 summer 2011 summer 2012 summer 2008

RR Lyr

summer 2013

?

http://rr-lyr.ast.obs-mip.fr/dbrr/dbrr-V1.0_0.php?en

slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Blazhko

effect