Rou
- uteing in
n sou
- uth
thwest of
- f the
the Bal Baltic Sea Sea Upda pdate 2019 to to HEL HELCOM Marit Maritim ime /Sa SafeNav
Risk assessment, traffic considerations and possible improvements
- www.bmvi.de
Rou outeing in n sou outh thwest of of the the Bal Baltic Sea - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Rou outeing in n sou outh thwest of of the the Bal Baltic Sea Sea Upda pdate 2019 to to HEL HELCOM Marit Maritim ime /Sa SafeNav Risk assessment, traffic considerations and possible improvements www.bmvi.de SW Baltic sea 1.
Risk assessment, traffic considerations and possible improvements
Example of maximum ship sizes Tanker shipping:
Port limits:
NOK 9,5 m T-Route 15,5 m Öresund 8,0m
Source: Kari Liuth: Maritime cluster in the Baltic Sea region and beyond , 02.06.2019
S, SW and W.
as follow:
0,9 m; between 0-1m by 74,9 %.
0,5 kn. In extreme situations (strong E‘ly or W‘ly winds) current
Source: [1] BSH, Naturverhältnisse Ost Se, 2008, pp. 10-12; [2] Admiralty Sailing Directions NP 18, 2018; [3]BSH, Berechnete Strömungen des operationellen Modellsystems des BSH, 05.082019
[2] [2] [3]
– –
limited
restricted in there movement in the area of Öjet und Kadetrinne
Source: EMODnet,2019
Since 2005 recognised as a Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSA) NATURA 2000 areas:
Source: Natura 2000 End 2018 - Shapefile, 2019
Wind park Status Arcadis Ost 1 Consent Authorised Kriegers Flak II Consent Authorised Arcona&Wikinger Fully Commisioned, Concept Authorised Baltic Eagle Consent Authorised Baltic 2 Fully Commisioned Gennaker Consent Authorised Kriegers Flak Pre-Construction Kriegers Flak Pre-Construction Rødsand 2 Fully Commissioned Nysted Fully Commissioned
Source: FEP 2019 (BSH), LEP M-V 2016, 4COffshore
cross “open water”, they prefer to go in straight lines between the harbours.
generally try to avoid sailing in TSS and deep water ways
have AIS transmitter.
Source: FEP 2019 (BSH); LEP M-V 2016; 4COffshore;
variable between the months and the years.
are N‘ly of Ruegen, N’ly of Wismar and the Bay of Kiel.
Source: Thünen-Institut für Ostseefischerei (OF), 2019
vessel paused trough Fehrmann Belt and 47 thousand Kadetrinne in 2017
recommended routes
structures may increase the risk of collision and groundings
Source: GDWSFEP 2019 (BSH); LEP M-V 2016; 4COffshore;
Route “T” (
Source: HELCOM, Shipping accidents, 2018; 6FEP 2019 (BSH); LEP M-V 2016; 4COffshore;
T-route (Langeland) T-route (Fehrmann) Kiel-T- Route Kiel- Fehrmann Kiel H-Route (Langeland) H-Route (Fehrmann) Fehrmann Belt
22000 10000 36000 20000 10000Kiel-T- Route Kiel- Fehrmann Kiel H-Route (Langeland) H-Route (Fehrmann) Fehrmann Belt
30000Traffic joinincg here gives relatively high risk
High since most ships pass through here Complex traffic in this area with several crossing traffic streams
West North Center ITZ West ITZ East Fehrmann Belt East Gate Kadetrenden
26000 20000 10000 46000 40000 30000 20000 10000Kadetrenden Kadetrenden
Complex traffic in this area with several crossing traffic streams Traffic joinincg here gives relatively high risk
High since most ships pass through here Ships on routes inside ITZ are generally sailing along the same lines in both directions, whereas ships in and entering/exiting TSS Kadetrinne tend to divide into lanes. This leads to relatively fewer head-on collisions.
Source: Ramboll, 2019
TSS W'ly of Fehmarnbelt
area “Öjet”
the deep water path to the Great Belt
<1.5 1.5 - 3 3 - 4.5 4.5 - 6 6-7.5 9 - 10.5 10.5<
3200
2000 1000 Fast ferry Fishing
General Cargo Tanker Other Passenger Pleasure Support
6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Ship Types- East Gate Ship Draught- East Gate
Gedser“ and „North of Rügen
Trafic Lane 1,8 sm
going traffic
border to Arkona
(lateral system)