Rotterdam 1 Port of Rotterdam Surface of dredging areas: 3.155 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

Using an innovative free fall sediment profiler for measuring mud and sediment layers to support tests

• n a new maintenance concept in the port of

Rotterdam

2

Port of Rotterdam

• Surface of dredging areas: 3.155 ha (30 km²)
• Maintenance depths: 3,65 – 24,00 m (cd)
• Annually dredged quantity 4 – 7 million m³, done by

hopper dredgers

3

Port of Rotterdam: Maintenance concept

4

Step1: Over depth creation in the central navigation channels

• In the middle of the main navigation channels an over-depth is created of 1

to 1,5 m on a depth of 24m.

• The trench is installed by a hopper dredger.

5

Step 2: Liquefaction and mobilisation of the sediment

• Liquefaction of the zones around

the trench by WID

• Mobilisation in steps towards the

trench

• Creation of an angle of repose
• Creation of density flows by a step by step

dredging procedure towards the trench

6

Step 3: Consolidation in the over depth and follow up

• In the over depth the liquefied mud can consolidate and the over depth acts as a buffer
• In the over depth a nautical depth criterion can be installed
• The follow up of the consolidation process is done by a free fall penetrometer

7

WID dredging towards the trench

8

Tests

• Test 1: Evaluate of novel measurement equipment to measure

in situ mud rheology by a free fall penetrometer

• Test 2: Erosion and liquefaction of underwater sediment

– Zone in the beerchannel at 23m – Followed up with multibeam echosounder and GraviProbe

• Test 3: Mobilisation of the sediment towards an over depth

– Zone near the Amazonehaven on a turning circle at 23 m – Followed up with multibeam echosounder and GraviProbe

9

Free fall penetrometer

10

GraviProbe

The rheological conditions of the soil layers are determining the probe’s dynamical behavior. The data acquired from on-board accelerometers, inclinometers and pressure sensors is feeding a dynamical model which determines the rheological and density parameters of the intruded.

Measurement pri rincip iple le

11

GraviProbe

As a result the GraviProbe is able to very accurately distinguish the depth of the fluid mud and consolidated mud layers, even in gassy environments.

Measurement pri rincip iple le

12

GraviProbe

Every measerement point is registered with a bluetooth gps module, the position of the drop can be processed on a map for visualization purposes.

Measurement pri rincip iple le

13

Sediment profiler Mud Map

14

Working principle

• Acceleration
• Speed
• Position
• Tip resistance
• Shear stress

Fshear= τshear.A Fgravity = m.g Fcone= τcone.V/d

∆z ∆z ∆z

Newtonian equation

F=ma=mg – Ftip - Fshear

15

GraviProbe compared to a standard CPT measurement

16

Port of Rotterdam: Test zones 1 2

17

Multibeam and GraviProbe locations

Before WID After WID

18

Dynamic cone resistance over time

19

Interpolated strength profiles

Acoustic signal Loose mud Consolidated mud

20

What sediment volume can be affected by the cutting nozzles?

• Pressure = 1 bar = 100kPa
• Flow = 12000 m³

/h

• Water nozzle speed = 23 m/s
• Ship speed = 1,25 knots (2340m/h)
• Beam width = 14 m

Fshear= τshear.A Fgravity = m.g Fcone= τcone.V/d

• Tip resistance = 1kPa to 2MPa
• Falling speed = 7 m/s

21

In Influ fluence depth th (tr (transport pot

• ten

enti tial)

• Accurate cutting depth of water

injection at 100 kPa pressure

Dill Dillution to

• 1,1

,1 t/m t/m³ (tr (transport quanti tity)

• Accurate bulk density

measurements on low and high density sediments

Performance estimators for WID

DensX

GraviProbe

22

Transport potential Transport quantity

Practical example

100 kPa

Strength (volume estimator) + Density (quantity estimator) = injection quantity per square meter m³H2O / m²

1.5 m³ /m²

23

Transport potential Transport quantity

Practical example

100 kPa

12000 (m³H2O/h) / (14 (m) * 2340 (m/h)) = 0.366 m³H2O/m²

1.5 m³ /m² 1.5 / 0.366 = 4.1 injections

24

Transport potential Transport quantity

Practical example

100 kPa

12000 (m³H2O/h) / (14 (m) * 2340 (m/h)) = 0.366 m³H2O/m² At least 4 injections needed

25

Port of Rotterdam: Test zones 1 2

26

Multibeam top mud

Before WID After WID

• On the entrance of the Amazonehaven there is a natural collection of

sediment.

• A multibeam image was taken of the area of investigation. In yellow green

the accumulated sediment area is visible.

27

• 26
• 25,5
• 25
• 24,5
• 24
• 23,5
• 23
• 22,5
• 22
• 1

9 19 29 39 49 Diepte (m) TCPR (kPa)

TCPR vs t 008D

TCPR t0 TCPR t1 TCPR t2

Top mud measured by multibeam 4kPa level before and after WID

28

4kPa level map

Before WID After WID

29

Cross section

• A pocket of loose mud is created. In total a volume of 190.000 m3 of loose

mud was created by 8 hours of WID dredging.

• The total of loose mud was not fully mobilized due to the shape of the bed of
• channel. In this case a distance of 600m needs to be bridged between agitated

area and the over depth area.

30

Conclusions

• Operational
• Erosion and liquefaction of sediment with

WID is feasible and efficiency is proven

• Mobilisation of sediment needs to be done

under correct repose angels and control

• ver the distance
• Upcoming full scale test by installation of a

central trench in the Beerchannel

• Advantages
• Predictability of the maintenance
• From corrective to preventive

maintenance

• Smoothening of the navigation channel
• Nautical depth criterion in the over

depth trench

• Optimal balance between WID and

hopper dredgers

31

Company Introduction