Robert (Bob) DeBroux, Chair Kim Keenan, Vice Chair July 20, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

robert bob debroux chair kim keenan vice chair july 20
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Robert (Bob) DeBroux, Chair Kim Keenan, Vice Chair July 20, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Robert (Bob) DeBroux, Chair Kim Keenan, Vice Chair July 20, 2017 Ident ntify p patte tterns of of specific i ins nstances of of acti tion ons a at t the the s sta tate a and nd lo local l le level t l that s serv rve as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Robert (Bob) DeBroux, Chair Kim Keenan, Vice Chair July 20, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Ident

ntify p patte tterns of

  • f specific i

ins nstances of

  • f acti

tion

  • ns a

at t the the s sta tate a and nd lo local l le level t l that s serv rve as ba barrie rriers t to bro broadba dband de d deplo ployment

  • For example, deployment moratoria, unfair or burdensome rights-of-way negotiation

and approval processes, excessive fees and other costs, unreasonable conditions, and bad faith negotiation practices

  • Provide recommendations to the Commission on how to address the patterns of

specific instances identified.

 Ident

ntify e examp mples a and nd d discus uss the the c cons

  • nsequences of
  • f loc
  • cal

gov

  • vernmental r

restricti tion

  • ns tha

that ma may “p “prohi

  • hibit or

t or ha have the the e effect of t of pro prohibit ibitin ing” s service

  • For example, requiring “undergrounding for wireless facilities,” placing restrictions on

the placement of communications facilities in a right of way, prohibiting upgrades to facilities, and prohibiting the placement of new poles in a right-of-way

  • Recommend solutions

 Exami

mine the the e extent to to whi hich muni municipalities ma may sing ngle out

  • ut

communi unicati tions

  • ns-rela

lated de d deplo ployments f for r more re bu burde rdensome tr treatm tment t tha than othe

  • ther d

deploy

  • yments tha

that ha t have the the s same me or

  • r simi

milar imp mpacts ts on

  • n land

nd us use

  • Make recommendations for addressing such disparate outcomes

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Work

rking Gro Group ( p (WG) G) m meets w weekly ly

 Effor

  • rts to

to date te ha have f foc

  • cus

used on

  • n ident

ntifying s sta tate/loc

  • cal b

barriers to to bro broadba dband de d deplo ployment f fro rom WG G membe bers

  • Responded to an internally designed survey regarding

stakeholders experiences and suggested recommendations with state/local entities

  • 189 examples provided

 Recent e

effor

  • rts

ts ha have f foc

  • cus

used on

  • n the

the F FCC comme

  • mments f

filed i in n tw two

  • recen

ent p proceed eedings gs

  • Created a data subgroup to review and summarize 202 sets of

comments  Completion date: July 24th

  • Qualitative analysis will be undertaken to identify patterns, root

causes, and recommended solutions

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Quantitativ ive and d qu qualit litativ ive a analy lysis o

  • f the da

data will ill le lead d to for

  • rmul

mulating r recom

  • mmendation
  • ns

 Quantitative Analysis

  • Tabulate the number of comments citing barriers by the main

categories and other factors

  • Identifies the patterns that exist but does not fully describe the

root causes and rationale for such barriers

 Qualitative Analysis

  • Provides a method for evaluating the information to determine—

 Why does the barrier exist-root causes and rationale?  What is the consequence of the barrier?  How have some states/localities dealt with such barriers?  What solutions have been recommended? Result ltant f fin indin dings w will ill be be dis discussed t d to form rmulate recomme mmend ndati tions

  • ns

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

April 21 Initial BDAC meeting June 6 Working Group (WG) Initial Meeting Weekly WG Status and Updates calls July 20 Mid-term BDAC meeting July 24 FCC comment review completed. Begin analysis of regulatory barriers August 16 Face-to-Face Meeting to continue analysis and develop recommendations

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Recommendations Format  Questions?

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Chair: r: Robert rt DeBrou roux, TD TDS Te Telecom Tim im U Ulr lrich* Vice ce-Cha hair: Kim Keena nan, n, Multicul ultur ural Media ia, T Tele lecom and Inte ternet C t Council il Christ stianna nna Barnhar nhart, Char arter Audrey ey Conner ers* Eliz izabeth th B Bowle les, A Aris isto totl tle Randy ndy Brog rogle, Zayo yo Kyle Burgess, s, Consum nsumers' Rese search Rick k Cime merma man, N NCTA CTA Bill ill Esbeck, Wis isconsin Sta tate te Telecommuni unicat ations A s Asso ssociation Valerie Fast st Horse se, Coeur ur d'Alene ne Tribe be

  • Dr. G

Georg

  • rge F

Ford rd, T The P Phoe

  • enix Center f

r for Adva vanc nced d Legal and d Econo nomic Publ blic Policy Studi udies Marc rc Gan Ganzi, , ExteN eNet Systems ms Antho hony ny Le Lehv* Carl rlos

  • s Gutierre

rrez, LGBT Tech chnol

  • log
  • gy

Partne nershi ship & p & Inst stitut ute Micha hael Hain, n, Nitta ttany Media ia Andy dy Huckaba aba, C City of Lene nexa K a KS Marc rc Hudson

  • n, Rock

cket Fiber * = A Alte lternate te Mar ark Johnson, The Quilt Virg rginia Lam Abra rams, Starry rry Sam m Licc ccard rdo, Mayor

  • r - Cit

ity of

  • f San Jos
  • se,

Calif ifornia ia Dolan Beckel el* Shiree een Sant ntosham ham* Danna nna MacKenzie ie, Min innesota Office of

  • f

Broadban adband d Deve velopm pment nt Rebe becca Murphy phy Thomps pson, n, Compe petitive Carrie iers rs A Associa iation

  • n

Kevin in Pa Pagan, C City ty Att Attorney, Mc McAllen, Texas Vict ctor

  • r Flore
  • res*

Aust ustin Stevens nson* n* Mark k Radaba dabaug ugh, W Wireless I Internet S Service Prov

  • viders

rs A Associ

  • ciation
  • n

Michael l Santorelli lli, Director, Advanc dvanced d Communi unicat ations ns Law & Policy Inst stitut ute, New York Law S School

  • ol

Dr

  • Dr. John Saw

aw, Spr print Charles M McKee* e* Berin in Szo Szoka, , TechFre reedom

  • m

Graha aham Owens* Sanj njay ay Udan dani, Verizo zon Paul l Vasin ingto ton*

7