road map
play

Road Map: Develop, Lock, Transfer & Validation YongJick Kim, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Road Map: Develop, Lock, Transfer & Validation YongJick Kim, Ph. D. Independent Consultant 1 The small BIG 25 years of hands-on experiences in biotech industry: Baxter healthcare Corp: 1992 ~ 2002 Licensed process (MA to CA)


  1. Road Map: Develop, Lock, Transfer & Validation YongJick Kim, Ph. D. Independent Consultant 1

  2. The small BIG • 25 years of hands-on experiences in biotech industry: • Baxter healthcare Corp: 1992 ~ 2002 • Licensed process (MA to CA) • Celltrion: 2002 ~ 2013 • sBLA, BLA, clinical study materials • ALWAYS see problems on the floor • Cannot change any thing • No! No! No! • Regulatory concerns; Product supply chain; Revenue • Small changes will make a Big difference 2

  3. Agenda I. Introduction II. Manufacturability III. Road Map IV. Conclusions 3

  4. INTRODUCTION 4

  5. Introduction(1) • Develop, Lock, Transfer, Qualification/Validation and Submission/Approval for Product launch • Quality vs. Schedule vs. Budget • Developability & Scalability is to assure Manufacturability • Cost Effectiveness & Process Economics should be addressed upfront • Price competitiveness • Biosimilar • Longer Product lifecycle • Small change, e.g., shorter process time/batch, can affect company revenue directly • As significant as yield improvement 5

  6. Introduction(2) • Assuming multiple product candidates in pipe line: • Multi-product facility • Reservation for potential CMO service • Better facility utilization • Develop Process based on Platform potentially applicable for all product candidates • Ex) CC/Centrifugation & Depth filtration/2 ~ 3 Column chromatography steps/Viral inactivation/UFDF/Virus filtration/UFDF/FF • Too unique process & product is not a smart choice 6

  7. Too unique process/product? • In-house facility • MFG facility layout is determined by 1 st unique process/product. • Requires significant facility fit to accommodate other products • Longer product changeover time has direct impact on annual MFG capacity & revenue • Outsourcing • Requires more facility fit resulting in more challenging to locate CMO facility • Higher batch price • Reservation for CMO service provider • Confront more challenges to find the right clients • Less competitive in batch price 7

  8. Introduction(3) • Ultimate objective is to launch the PRODUCT for commercial purpose • So much works to do: • 7 functional groups involved: complicated • Product Discovery & preliminary analytical method development: R&D PD/QC • Process Development/Scale-up/Optimization: R&D, Tech Ops, MFG, QA • Analytical method Qualification/Validation: QC, QA • MFG facility Construction/Qualification/Validation: ENG, MFG, QC, QA • Submission and approval: RA & others • Start with limited resources • Find the problem(s) early and fix the problem(s) early 8

  9. Introduction (4) • How can we reduce a risk for the failure? • Recommend to consolidate and document all the information: ROAD MAP • Road Map is very powerful tool to meet your needs • Effective to continuously monitor & evaluate the project status • Powerful to evaluate the impact of one delay on next milestone(s) and on overall project • Quality, Schedule, Budget • Becomes in-house procedure for next product launch • Many small Road Maps become Master Road Map: Project Manager • Recommend Road Map to be semi-controlled(?) document per semi-change control(?) process 9

  10. MANUFACTURABILITY (PROCESS) 10

  11. Requirements for Manufacturability • Expect very similar challenges from platform based process in MFG • Manufacturability means consistency & robustness • Know-how to avoid MFG challenges based on science & technology • Higher operational success rate • Road Map should start from the manufacturability • Define requirements for Manufacturability • List MFG challenges in UP, DP & FF • List QC challenge for in-process, DS and FP • Provide information to R&D PD and R&D QC • Consider manufacturability during developability and scalability phases 11

  12. Process Characterization Study • Why? • QbD & DOE • To understand the process performance in depth • To determine in-process & final specifications for CQAs: • Ranges and/or set points • Provide rationale for scale up • Ex) Kla/tip speed/aspec ratio, G-force, linear velocity • Study design should cover both scientific and operational perspectives • Parameters for edge of failure study include MFG needs. • Use as a solid scientific justification for deviation closure(s) • Should combine the study at small scale and at commercial scale 12

  13. CC Challenges from Operational Perspectives • Condition for culture termination: • Inoculum expansion • Bioreactor • % cell viability drop & increase in process related impurity level: • Harvest timing • Impurity clearance capacity • Resin regeneration capacity • More contact with air with no control during harvest in large scale: • Changes in pH & dissolved oxygen, dissolved CO2 matter to product? • Media preparation in large scale: tank turnaround time • Solubility of Media components: feed media for fed-batch 13

  14. PP Challenges from Operational Perspectives • Resin selection • Cost • Performance vs. Economics (incl. resin lifetime) • Property • Some resins have more shrinkage/swelling characteristics in large scale • Might affect column height to be out of range • Column packing in large scale is more challenging for certain type of resin • Elution profile • Pool volume adjustment for pH and/or conductivity for loading to next column • Process tank size • Process time • Buffer pH & conductivity • Tank corrosion 14

  15. FF Challenges from Operational Perspectives • More automated unit operation • Sensitivity against shear and oxidation during formulation and fill on product quality • Final filterability to cover HI & LOW dosage range • Filter clogging • Stability after final formulation at room temperature provides operational flexibility • Equipment failures • Filter clogging 15

  16. ROAD MAP 16

  17. How to develop a Road Map? I. Requirements for PROCESS LOCK  Level of confidence  No more change II. Requirements for TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER  Deliverables  Sending & Receiving units III. Requirements for PROCESS Qualification/Validation • Becomes official under QA’s oversight • Protocols with acceptance criteria • Resources (SME) 17

  18. Ready for Process LOCK • Lock the process based on: • Level of confidence in • Manufacturability, Developability & Scalability • Process Characterization study report (small scale) • Plan for remaining studies at scale (ENG/GMP runs) • In-process specifications(preliminary?) • Initiate Assay Qualification with materials produced from the process after LOCK & complete prior to Engineering runs • Process description draft with preliminary specifications for DS and DP 18

  19. Ready for Tech Transfer • Deliverables for both Sending & Receiving units • Process characterization study plan (at scale) • Success of Tech Transfer means meeting the specifications: • N=3 Engineering (GMP) runs • In-process specs, DS and DP specs. • Requires close coordination between all functional groups 19

  20. Ready for Qualification/Validation? • Process is fully developed, locked and transferred: • Eng(GMP) runs meet the specifications consistently for in-process specifications, DS and DP. • All the assays are fully validated and capable of measuring CQAs to determine the batch releasability • Manufacturing facility including EM and clean utilities, i.e., WFI & CS, are validated. 20

  21. Process Validation (per FDA guidance for Industry) • To establishes scientific evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality product • Stage1: Process Design (Process Description) • To define commercial manufacturing process • Stage 2: Process Qualification (Process Validation) • To determine if the process is capable of reproducible commercial manufacturing • State 3: Continued Process Verification • Process remains in a state of control • Periodic revalidation • Process equipment, QC equipment & facility 21

  22. Successful Process Validation means • After PV execution, you should • Understand the sources of variation • Detect the presence and degree of variation • Understand the impact of variation on the process and ultimately on product attributes • Control the variation in a manner commensurate with the risk it represents to the process and product • Should judge whether it has gained sufficient understanding to provide a high degree of assurance in its manufacturing process to justify commercial distribution of the product 22

  23. To conclude I. Developability & Scalability is to assure Manufacturability  Process economics II. Consider facility utilization during process/product development  Minimize facility fit & changeover time III. Road Map  Powerful tool to streamline Lock, Transfer, Qualification/Validation process  Quality, Schedule & Budget IV. The small BIG  Price competitiveness  Longer product lifecycle 23

  24. THANKS! 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend