RFP Information Sessions December 4 & 9, 2014 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rfp information sessions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RFP Information Sessions December 4 & 9, 2014 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RFP Information Sessions December 4 & 9, 2014 www.siliconvalleycf.org/thebiglift RFP Timeline December 4: RFP Release December 4 and 9: General info sessions Weekly: FAQs available on website January 16: Proposals Due


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RFP Information Sessions

December 4 & 9, 2014

www.siliconvalleycf.org/thebiglift

slide-2
SLIDE 2

RFP Timeline

  • December 4: RFP Release
  • December 4 and 9: General info sessions
  • Weekly: FAQs available on website
  • January 16: Proposals Due
  • February: Interviews with finalists
  • March: Announcement of selected communities
  • March/April: QRIS Validation/Contract Negotiations
  • April: Execution of Agreements
  • April/May: The Big Lift‐Off
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Big Lift Goal

Increase percentage of San Mateo County third graders reading proficiently from 57% to 80%.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Four Pillars of the Big Lift

  • High‐quality preschool for 3‐ and 4‐year olds

and aligned high‐quality learning experiences in K‐3rd grade

  • Reduced chronic absence in the early grades
  • Inspiring summer learning opportunities
  • Meaningful partnerships between families

and schools

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Collective Impact Approach

  • Central to the design and success of The Big Lift
  • No single solution to complex problems
  • Collective impact basics

– Common agenda/shared vision – Shared measurement – Mutually reinforcing activities – Continuous communication – Backbone support

  • Countywide through the PPLC/The Big Lift
  • Community‐wide through Big Lift grantees
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Social Innovation Fund

  • Key White House initiative
  • Finding solutions that work and making them

work for more people

  • Identify, evaluate, and expand promising

practices

  • Emphasis on rigorous evaluation
  • Every federal dollar must be matched 1:1 by

the intermediary and again by its subgrantees

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Funds Available and Term of Awards

Estimated funds available in Year 1 Up to $3,500,000 Estimated Range of Awards, Per Community $195,000 ‐ $1,000,000 Estimated Number of Awards 10‐12 grants within 2‐4 communities Three year term: Spring 2015 – June 2018

*Includes start‐up period in Spring 2015*

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Funds in this RFP Available for…

  • High quality new & enhanced preschool spaces
  • Coordination of community collaboratives
  • Dedicated staff to meet Big Lift requirements

– Compliance, reporting, data, evaluation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Eligible Applicants

  • Eleven communities
  • Two co‐lead agencies for each community
  • 1. School District
  • 2. Co‐Lead partner agency(ies)
  • Consolidated applications
  • Eligible preschool programs
  • Organizational capacity
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Matching Fund Requirements ‐ Per Grantee Community

  • FY 2014/15: No grantee community match
  • FY 2015/16: 10% of grant (5% cash)
  • FY 2016/17: 15% of grant (7.5% cash)
  • FY 2017/18: 20% of grant (10% cash)
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Matching Fund Requirements

$90 Big Lift Contribution

$10 community match

FY 15/16 ‐ Hypothetical Grant Amount = $100

(10% match requirement)

$5 cash match $5 non‐cash match

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Preschool Provider Eligibility

  • Located within school district boundaries
  • Center‐based
  • Nonprofit and public organizations
  • QRIS Tier 3 and Above
  • Organizational capacity

– Operating budget $1 million annually – Full‐time executive staff person – Dedicated finance/fiscal support

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Preschool Priorities

  • 2 years of high quality preschool
  • 3‐ and 4‐year‐olds
  • Working families
  • Low and middle‐income families
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Estimating request for preschool funding

Based on minimum of 3 hours per day and 525 hours per year

Type of Child Space Per Child Space Annual Funding

  • A. New spaces, full‐day, full‐year (~246 days /year)

Up to $12,100

  • B. New spaces, part‐day, part‐year (~175 days /year)

Up to $5,500

  • C. “Enhanced” existing, full‐day spaces (~246 days /year)

Up to $2,500

  • D. “Enhanced” existing, part‐day (~175 days /year)

Up to $1,500

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Estimating requests for funding

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Quality Rating Improvement System (QRIS)

Improving

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Supports for Big Lift Preschool Providers

  • Funding
  • Classroom assessment
  • Quality Improvement Planning
  • Professional development, coaching and TA
  • Family engagement
  • Supplies and materials
  • TA for data and fiscal/braided funding
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Integrating The Big Lift Four Pillars

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Integrating The Big Lift Four Pillars

  • Critical to Big Lift design and success
  • Commitment to four pillars required
  • Planning process in collaboration with grantees
  • Some strategies already identified

– Raising a Reader (Plus) – Chronic absence

  • Gradual integration over time

– Summer programs beginning 2016

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Big Lift Commitments

  • The Big Lift
  • Co‐Lead Agencies
  • School Districts
  • Preschools
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Co‐Lead Agency Commitments

  • Convene collaborative
  • Plan for progress on the four pillars
  • Promote alignment across systems
  • Meet with other Big Lift leaders

Community commitment:

  • Raise matching funds
slide-22
SLIDE 22

School District Commitments

  • Share community‐wide vision for achieving

third grade reading

  • Progress on four pillars of The Big Lift
  • PreK‐3 alignment
  • Authentic family engagement
  • Data on attendance and chronic absenteeism
  • Data collection for evaluation
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Preschool Provider Commitments

School district commitments, plus:

  • Meet quality standards based on the QRIS
  • Participate in professional development,

technical assistance and coaching

  • Make progress on goals established in

individualized Quality Improvement Plans

  • Significant assessment, data and evaluation

requirements

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Evaluation

  • Short‐ and long‐term outcome measures will

be developed

  • All communities and grantees will participate

in an independent evaluation effort

  • All preschool programs will input child, family

and teacher data into a centralized data system

  • School districts will contribute K‐3 student

assessment data

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Review and Selection Process

Seven part review process:

  • 1. Paper screening
  • 2. External review panel
  • 3. Internal review
  • 4. Interviews with finalists
  • 5. Consultation with CNCS
  • 6. Announcement of awards
  • 7. QRIS validation
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Federal Regulations and Compliance

  • Monthly invoicing and data reports
  • Program and financial reports at least 2x per

year

  • Criminal background checks
  • Compliance with accounting practices necessary

to manage and report on CNCS federal funds

  • Compliance with data storage and human

subjects protections

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Elements of Completed Proposals

  • Co‐lead agencies and preschool narratives
  • District and preschool provider assurances
  • Preschool provider application
  • QRIS Self‐Rating Form
  • Preschool funding calculator
  • Financial statements
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Resources for Applicants

  • Subsidized preschool data for 3‐and 4‐year olds in

Big Lift communities.

  • Center‐based preschool programs in Big Lift

communities ‐ contact info

  • San Mateo QRIS
  • SIF Terms and Conditions
  • Web‐based resource links
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Frequently Asked Questions

Via email to: cel@siliconvalleycf.org Updated regularly at: www.siliconvalleycf.org/thebiglift

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Questions?