RFIC Design for Wireless Communications RFIC Design for Wireless - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rfic design for wireless communications rfic design for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RFIC Design for Wireless Communications RFIC Design for Wireless - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RFIC Design for Wireless Communications RFIC Design for Wireless Communications VLSI Design & Test Seminar, April 19, 2006 Foster Dai 1. An An MIMO Multimode WLAN RFIC 1. 2. A Direct Digital Synthesizer IC Direct Digital


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Foster Dai, April, 2006 1

1.

  • 1. An

An MIMO Multimode WLAN RFIC

  • 2. A
  • 2. A ∆Σ

∆Σ ∆Σ ∆Σ Direct Digital Synthesizer IC Direct Digital Synthesizer IC Foster Dai

VLSI Design & Test Seminar, April 19, 2006

RFIC Design for Wireless Communications RFIC Design for Wireless Communications

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Foster Dai, April, 2006 2

An MIMO Multimode WLAN RFIC

1.

  • 1. An Overview of MIMO Technology

An Overview of MIMO Technology 2.

  • 2. MIMO Transceiver Design

MIMO Transceiver Design 3.

  • 3. Transceiver Building Block Circuits

Transceiver Building Block Circuits 4.

  • 4. Measured Results

Measured Results

1 .

Dave G. Rahn, Mark S. Cavin, Foster F. Dai, Neric Fong, Richard Griffith, Jose Macedo, David Moore, John W. M. Rogers, and Mike Toner, “A Fully Integrated Multi-Band MIMO WLAN Transceiver RFIC,” IEEE Journal on Solid State Circuits, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 1629-1641, August, 2005. IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, pp. 290 – 293, Kyoto, Japan, June, 2005.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Foster Dai, April, 2006 3

250 200 150 100 50

  • 10

10 30

  • 5

20 25 Average SNR (dB)/Antenna Average Data Rate (Mbps) 5 15 35 1x1 1x2 – SD 4x4 CBF 4x4 VCBF 16.5dB

Advantages of MIMO Technology

  • MIMO can extend range and

higher data rates

  • Graph shows that for a 4X4

MIMO system 16.5dB less S/N ratio required for 54MBit/sec compared to standard technology

  • As well vector CBF is shown

which uses four orthogonal data streams to increase data rate 4X.

  • VCBF not implemented here

(not backwards compatible), but shows future of this technology.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Foster Dai, April, 2006 4

MIMO Transceiver Design

LO Porting Trace Master Chip Slave Chip LO Porting Trace

Transmitting Radio Beam Forming in the TX to get antenna gain through signal shaping

Master Chip Slave Chip

Maximum ratio Combining at receive of signals in four paths at the RX Link Receiving Radio Note: Both beam forming and maximum ratio combining controlled by DSP Two Radios On the same chip

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Foster Dai, April, 2006 5

MIMO Transceiver Design Issues

MIMO transceiver RFIC design is a challenge due to the following issues: 1. Multiple radios on same die cause interference, especially PAs cause VCO injection-locking. Careful floor planning and proper isolation in layout are critical. VCOs operate at different frequencies from the PAs. 2. All LOs must be synchronized. MIMO calibration requires loop back measurement to match phase and amplitude of all paths. 3. Tx-Tx isolation must be high to maximize the gain from CBF. 30dB

  • r higher desired.

4. Rx-Rx isolation must be maximized in order to maximize the gain from MCR. 40dB desired.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Foster Dai, April, 2006 6

MIMO Transceiver Design Block Diagram

  • Uses walking IF

architecture for only one synthesizer

  • Includes 2 a/b/g paths
  • n each chip.
  • Either master or slave

PLL mode.

  • BB filters switched so

same Si used in Tx and Rx.

LNA PA RFLO IFLOQ IFMIX BBLPF IFMIX IFLOI IFLOQ VGA VGA RFMIX PPA RFOUT1 2.5GHz RFIN1 2.5GHz BBI1 BBQ1 RFLO

÷4

IFLOI IFLOQ ∆Σ SYN VCO RCLPF XTAL RFLO

÷4

IFLOI IFLOQ ∆Σ SYN VCO RCLPF XTAL LNA RFMIX RFIN1 5GHz PA RFOUT1 5GHz Switch Switch PPA LNA PA RFLO IFLOQ IFMIX BBLPF IFMIX IFLOI IFLOQ VGA VGA RFMIX PPA RFOUT2 2.5GHz RFIN2 2.5GHz BBI2 BBQ2 LNA RFMIX RFIN2 5GHz PA RFOUT2 5GHz Switch Switch PPA

Path2 Path1 Serial to Parallel Interface

Legend: Matching Network

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Foster Dai, April, 2006 7

+ ÷4 ∆Σ accumulator size F : : nth order ∆Σ Fine tune frequency word K Course tune frequency word C + Multi-modulus Divider Reference source FRef ÷R

PFD Charge Pump

FRF VCOs n 1

  • ff chip

LPF

FIF 90° 0° Reset

Bi-Directional LO Porting Circuit From master or to slave chip LO + Reset Signal RF mixer IF mixers

Baseband I-Q output Baseband I-Q input

RF mixer

Multiple Input Multiple Output Transceiver Additional Radio Paths (not shown)

Synthesizer Design

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Foster Dai, April, 2006 8

Synthesizer

MIMO Transceiver

∆Σ ∆Σ

VCO MMD PFD/CP LO Porting

RX1a RX2a RX1b/g RX2b/g SPI IF1 IF2 BB1 BB2 TX1b/g TX2b/g TX1a TX2a

Chip Layout

  • Designed in a

50GHz SiGe BiCMOS technology

  • Chip measures

5.4mmX5.4mm

  • Placed in a 72pin

leadless plastic chip carrier (LPCC) package .

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Foster Dai, April, 2006 9

Center: 5.18GHz RBW: 11.9344kHz

  • 110

dBm 10 dB /div

  • 10

dBm B: Ch1 Spectrum Range: -15dBm Span: 36MHz TimeLen: 320.0304uSec

  • 2.715

RBW: 312.5kHz 2.7152 TimeLen: 60 Sym

  • 1.5

1.5 I-Q 300 m /div A: Ch1 OFDM Meas Range: -15dBm

EVM Measurements

Shows typical EVM measurement which complies with IEEE 802.11a standard.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Foster Dai, April, 2006 10

Synthesizer Phase Noise Measurements

  • Shows good agreement with measured results.

Frequency Offset (kHz)

0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 10000

Phase Noise ( dBc/Hz)

  • 60
  • 70
  • 80
  • 90
  • 100
  • 110
  • 120
  • 130
  • 140
  • 150
  • 160
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Foster Dai, April, 2006 11

SUMMARY OF TRANSCEIVER PERFORMANCE Parameter Performance Band 802.11b/g 802.11a Technology 0.5µm SiGe BiCMOS Voltage Supply 2.75V 2.75V TX Chain Current Supply (1path/2paths) 240/ 400mA 255/ 430mA RX Chain Current Supply (1path/2paths) 195/ 320mA 195/ 320mA Synthesizer Current supply 36mA 36mA TX output power 11dBm 13.5dBm EVM at TX output power 4% (g only) 4% TX Path to Path Isolation (measured at the PA outputs) > 40dB > 40dB RX NF @ Max Gain 4.1dB 7.5dB RX chain Max Gain 77 dB 72 dB RX chain Min Gain 5.5dB 25dB Rx IIP3 @ Min Gain +8.8 dBm

  • 12.8 dBm

RX I/Q Amplitude Imbalance 0.3 dB 0.3 dB RX I/Q Quadrature Error 2.0° 2.0° SUMMARY OF TRANSCEIVER PERFORMANCE Parameter Performance Band 802.11b/g 802.11a Rx Path to Path Isolation (measured at the BB filter output) >50dB > 40dB Max DC offset without correction (measured at the output of the BB filter) 90mV 90mV Synthesizer Integrated Noise 100Hz to 10MHz 0.35~0.43° rms 0.63~0.86° rms VCO Phase Noise

  • 120dBc/Hz

@ 1MHz

  • 120dBc/Hz

@ 1MHz In Band Phase Noise

  • 98dBc/Hz

@ 10kHz

  • 98dBc/Hz

@ 10kHz Synthesizer Reference Frequency 40MHz Synthesizer Step Size 468.75kHz 781.25kHz Synthesizer Spurious <-50 dBc

Chip Measurements

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Foster Dai, April, 2006 12

A Multi-Band Σ∆ Σ∆ Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizer

John W.M. Rogers, Foster F. Dai, Mark S. Cavin, and Dave G. Rahn, “A Fully Integrated Multi-Band SD Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizer for a MIMO WLAN Transceiver RFIC,” IEEE Journal on Solid State Circuits, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 678-689, March, 2005.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Foster Dai, April, 2006 13

CONFER ENCE ROOM 26 OFFICE 25 2 OFFICE 35 OFFICE 28 OFFICE 27 OFFICE 29 OFFICE 30 OFFICE 31 OFFICE 32 OFFICE 33 OFFICE 34 OFFICE 36 OFFICE 37 OFFICE 38 OFFICE 39 CONFER ENCE ROOM 14 OFFICE MECHAN ICAL 19 2 COPY R M. 23 OFFICE 24 2 OFFICE 22 2 OFFICE 20 WORKR OOM 21 OFFICE 2 OFFICE 1 OFFICE 3 OFFICE 18 WORK R OOM 16 OFFICE 17 PANTRY 15 OFFICE 7 OFFICE 8 OFFICE 5 OFFICE TELECOMM. 13 OFFICE 9 OFFICE 10 CONFER ENCE 11 RECEPTION 12 3

1x1 1x2sel 4CBFx2sel 4x2 CBF

AP

Scale: 10feet

Demo of Range Improvement Using the MIMO Transceiver RFIC

Shows improved range of MIMO radios in an office building at 2.4GHz. 4X4 link range too large to show.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Foster Dai, April, 2006 14

  • Implemented an IEEE 802.11a/b/g transceiver RFIC for 2.4GHz

and 5.2GHz and Japan 4.9GHz multi-band MIMO WLAN applications.

  • Transceiver RFIC includes two complete radio paths fully

integrated on the same chip.

  • Using walking IF architecture, uses a single Σ∆ fractional-N

synthesizer for LO generation.

  • Using two RFICs, 4X4 MIMO radio link has been tested under a

typical indoor WLAN environment.

  • The measured 4X4 MIMO radio achieves 15dB of link margin

improvement over a conventional SISO radio.

Conclusions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Foster Dai, April, 2006 15

A CMOS Direct Digital Frequency Synthesizer with Single- Stage SD Interpolator and Current-Steering DAC

  • DDS spurs and quantization noise due to phase

truncation.

  • Frequency domain and phase domain Σ∆

Σ∆ noise shaping schemes.

  • 12-bit current-steering DAC with Q2 random walk

switching scheme.

1 .Foster F. Dai, Weining Ni, Yin Shi and Richard C. Jaeger, “A Direct Digital

Frequency Synthesizer with Single-Stage ∆Σ Interpolator and Current-Steering DAC,” IEEE Journal on Solid State Circuits, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp.839-850, April

  • 2006. IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, pp. 56–59, Kyoto, Japan, June, 2005.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Foster Dai, April, 2006 16

Conventional ROM-Based DDS

Fine step size requires a large accumulator and a large ROM. To reduce ROM size, the phase word is truncated, causing spurs at DDS output.

+

Z-1 N N N D

DAC

~ ~ ~

Deglitch LPF P D-bits DAC Filtered sin waveform Digitized sin amplitude Sampled sin waveform Phase to amplitude conversion Truncated phase Phase Phase accumulator Frequency control word (FCW) Phase truncation

M S B L S B

N-P

2P phase addresses

SIN look up table

D amplitude bits Numerically controlled oscillator (NCO)

N clk

  • FCW

f f 2 =

  • f
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Foster Dai, April, 2006 17

DDS Pros and Cons

  • Advantages

Fine frequency tuning resolution Fast frequency switching Quadrature outputs with accurate I/Q matching Direct modulations (PSK, FSK, MSK, PM, and FM) Compatible with digital CMOS processing

  • Disadvantages

Low output frequency Quantization noise and spurious tones

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Foster Dai, April, 2006 18

Z-1 Phase word truncation 1-(1-Z-1)k SIN ROM 16 16 8 MSBs 8 LSBs phase error ep(i) SIN word 12 12-bit DAC DAC Deglitch LPF SIN

  • utput

Phase word 4th order Σ∆ noise shaper

+ +

FCW

DDS With 4th Order Σ∆ Σ∆ Modulator

Implemented in 0.35µm CMOS Technology

  • Using a 4th order Σ∆ modulator, ROM sized is reduced by a factor
  • f 16 times, without compressing the ROM.
  • ROM size can be further reduced using ROM compression

algorithms.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Foster Dai, April, 2006 19

Output Spectrum Before Deglitch Filter

For DDS With 4th Order ∆Σ ∆Σ Modulator

(a) Simulated (b) Measured

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Foster Dai, April, 2006 20

With ∆Σ

∆Σ

Without ∆Σ

∆Σ

SFDR improved by 14 dB

72dB 58dB

Comparison of Measured Output Spectra for DDS with and without The 4th Order ∆Σ ∆Σ Modulator

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Foster Dai, April, 2006 21

Die Photo of The ∆Σ ∆Σ DDS Prototype

Implemented in 0.35µm CMOS Technology

Die area = 2.2×2mm2 DDS core = 1.11mm2

Σ∆ Σ∆ accumulator = 0.3×0.2mm2

ROM = 0.3×0.3mm2 ROM size is greatly reduced due to the use of Σ∆ Σ∆. DAC = 0.6×1.6mm2 Power consumption = 200mW DAC = 82 mW Vdd = 3.3V Max clock frequency = 300MHz

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Foster Dai, April, 2006 22

Questions?

Contact Foster Dai

Associate Professor Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering 200 Broun Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5201 Phone: (334) 844-1863, Fax: (334) 844-1809, daifa01@eng.auburn.edu