27 Feb 2018 “Gravity and Cosmology 2018” YITP
Revisiting the gravitational lensing with Gauss Bonnet theorem
Hideki Asada (Hirosaki)
Ono, Ishihara, HA, PRD 96, 104037 (2017) Ishihara, Ono, HA, PRD 94, 084015 (2016) PRD 95, 044017 (2017)
Revisiting the gravitational lensing with Gauss Bonnet theorem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Gravity and Cosmology 2018 YITP 27 Feb 2018 Revisiting the gravitational lensing with Gauss Bonnet theorem Hideki Asada (Hirosaki) Ishihara, Ono, HA, PRD 94, 084015 (2016) PRD 95, 044017 (2017) Ono, Ishihara, HA, PRD 96, 104037 (2017)
27 Feb 2018 “Gravity and Cosmology 2018” YITP
Revisiting the gravitational lensing with Gauss Bonnet theorem
Hideki Asada (Hirosaki)
Ono, Ishihara, HA, PRD 96, 104037 (2017) Ishihara, Ono, HA, PRD 94, 084015 (2016) PRD 95, 044017 (2017)
Eddington 1919
Will, LRR (06)
ページFigure 5: Measurements of the coefficient (1 + )/2 from light deflection and time delay measurements. Its GR value is unity. The arrows at the top denote anomalously large values from early eclipse
with GR to 10–3 percent, and VLBI light deflection measurements have reached 0.02 percent. Hipparcos denotes the optical astrometry satellite, which reached 0.1 percent.
“Gravitational Lens” Gravitational deflection angle of light provides a powerful tool
Gaudi et al. Science (08)
NASA/HST
Sahu et al., Science 356, 1046–1050 (2017) 9 June 2017
First measure of gravitational deflection angle
Gravitational bending of light (Gravitational Lens) 1) Testing gravity theories 2) Astronomical tool (natural telescope)
Derivation of Standard formula (at textbook level)
α = 4GM bc2
assumes asymptotic source and observer(receiver). However, in practice,
Ishihara+(2016)
a static and spherically symmetric (SSS) spacetime.
ds2 = −A(r)dt2 + B(r)dr2 + r2dΩ2.
as ds2 = 0,
dt2 = γijdxidxj = B(r) A(r)dr2 + r2 A(r)dΩ2,
δ
Fermat’s principle In this space with , light rays are spatial geodesic.
γij
Light ray γij = gij Note Optical metric We consider a space defined by optical metric.
δ γij dxi dt dxj dt
geometrical configuration Light ray
We define This definition seems to make no sense, because 1) Two “Ψ”s are angles at different positions. 2) “Φ” is merely an angular coordinate. We examine this definition in more detail.
Gauss-Bonnet theorem
KdS +
gd +
N
a = 2
Euclidean space
α = ΨR − ΨS + φRS = −
R ∞ S
KdS.
coordinate-invariant Ishihara et al. (2016)
See also Gibbons&Werner (2008) for r=∞ case (R and S are in Euclid space)
Asymptotically flat spacetime
III. EXAMPLES
Namely, we assume rR → ∞ and rS → ∞ . Then, ΨR = 0 and ΨS = π
agrees with the textbook calculations
B. Approximations
Schwarzschild metric
δα ∼ O Mb rS2 + Mb rR2
Correction by finite distance
δα ∼ Mb rR2 ∼ 10−5arcsec. × M M⊙ b R⊙ 1AU rR 2
Examples Sun Sgr A*
δα ∼ Mb rS2 ∼ 10−5arcsec. ×
4 × 106M⊙ b 3M 0.1pc rS 2
1 × 10 5 × 10 1 × 10 5 × 10 1 × 10 10 10 6 10 5 10 4 rR [ km ] | | [ arcsec ]
to b = R⊙
and b = 10R⊙,
to 10 micro arcseconds.
Sun
1000 10 10 106 107 108 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 rS [ ] | | [ arcsec ]
to 10 micro arcseconds.
to b = 6M and b = 102M,
Sgr A*
α =rg b
R +
S
6
R
uR +
S
uS
12
R
+ 1
S
g, Λ2).
OPtuhiefrs !BCHI !mnopdeeflmst
Kottler (Schwarzschild de-Sitter) in GR
α =2m b
R +
S
R
+ buS
S
Weyl conformal gravity
> 2π
STtursopnogh !deeffglmefcdtuijopno !lmijmnijtu
1 loop case Ishihara et al. (2017)
Darwin(1959), Bozza(2002) and so on
By induction, one can prove for any winding number
A. Stationary, axisymmetric spacetime and
ds2 =gµνdxµdxν = − A(yp, yq)dt2 − 2H(yp, yq)dtdφ + F(yp, yq)(γpqdypdyq) + D(yp, yq)dφ2,
p, q =1, 2
Lewis(1932), Levy and Robinson (1963), Papapetrou (1966) (Cylindrical coordinates => Weyl-Lewis-Papapetrou form)
We choose spherical coordinates Ono et al. (2017)
ds2 = − A(r, θ)dt2 − 2H(r, θ)dtdφ + B(r, θ)dr2 + C(r, θ)dθ2 + D(r, θ)dφ2.
dt =
Induced by rotation L = 1 2mv2 − q v · A cf. charged particle in magnetic field
Lorentz (Lorentz-like) force is direction-dependent
Let us consider the photon orbits on the equatorial plane. Again, we define
We use the Gauss-Bonnet theorem...
α = −
R ∞ S
KdS − S
R
κgdℓ,
caused by rotation (gravitomagnetic effect) New correction
Prograde Retrograde infinity limit infinity limit
agrees with the known result
αprog =2M b
b2
M 2 b2
→ α∞ prog →4M b − 4aM b2 + O M 2 b2
b
b2
M 2 b2
b + 4aM b2 + O M 2 b2
Summary The gravitational deflection angle of light by using the GB theorem stationary and axisymmetric Extensions are future work
asada@hirosaki-u.ac.jp