Reviews to Enforce Mental Health Parity Regulations Elizabeth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reviews to enforce
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reviews to Enforce Mental Health Parity Regulations Elizabeth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Using Form Filing Reviews to Enforce Mental Health Parity Regulations Elizabeth Messenger-Jones, IMPAQ Health Learning Objective: Learning Objective 1: Using process improvement tools, states can identify common mental health parity


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Elizabeth Messenger-Jones, IMPAQ Health

Using Form Filing Reviews to Enforce Mental Health Parity Regulations

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Learning Objective 1:
  • Using process improvement tools, states can identify common mental health parity

violations, differing interpretations and approaches, and opportunities for additional guidance on requirements.

  • States can use existing regulatory authority to enforce mental health/substance use

disorder (MH/SUD) parity regulations during form filing reviews through providing additional training to review teams and implementing simple process improvements.

  • Learning Objective 2:
  • These process improvement tools can be used to help states enforce other types of

regulations maintaining and improving consumer access and insurance coverage.

Learning Objective:

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview: Pennsylvania

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) does not mandate Mental health or addiction coverage, however, when provided it requires:

Overview:

=

Benefits Financial Requirements or Treatment Limitations

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Overview:

The ACA made two major changes to MH/SUD Coverage: Essential Health Benefit Extends Parity through EHB

&

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overview: State Role in MH/SUD Parity Enforcement

State MHPAEA Enforcement

Form Filing Reviews Market Conduct Exams Targeted Audits

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Policy examiners verify plan contracts for language required by federal and state law.

Overview: Form Filing Review

FORMS FL FLAGS & VIOLATIONS ISS ISSUERS AUDIT

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Evidence:

$50 office visit copay

Higher Cost-Sharing

$30 office visit copay 36 visits per year

Treatment Limits

No outpatient visit restrictions Applied behavioral analysis generally for autism

Exclusions

No comparable exclusion For partial hospitalization or intensive outpatient services

Prior Authorizations

Not required for comparable services Step therapy for MH/SUD prescriptions

Non-Quantitative Treatment Limits

No comparable limit

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Health Policy Implications:

RE REGULATORY AUTHORITY PROCESS IM IMPROVEMENT

Using existing regulatory authority to identify potential violations without claims review. Leveraging established tools to review for MH/SUD parity.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Compliance monitoring improves consumer access.

Why This Matters:

Opioid Addiction Treatment Form Filing: Market-wide Assessment

&

slide-11
SLIDE 11

These process improvement methods can be applied across multiple settings.

Why This Matters:

Vulnerable Populations Diabetes “Short-Term” vs ACA Plans

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Elizabeth Messenger-Jones Project Director, PA Insurance Department TA – Evaluation of Mental Health Parity Review Process

  • Phone: 781-772-3748
  • Email: emjones@impaqint.com
  • IMPAQ Health: http://www.impaqint.com/practice-areas/impaq-health

Special thanks to Anne Pick and Jensen Chiu for their contributions.

Contact Information/Acknowledgements: