icann reviews update
play

ICANN Reviews Update Update on Reviews from the Multistakeholder - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ICANN Reviews Update Update on Reviews from the Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives Team Larisa Gurnick MSSI Presentation 11 October 2017 Agenda 2 3 1 Operating Opportunities to Reviews Standards Participate | 2


  1. ICANN Reviews Update Update on Reviews from the Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives Team Larisa Gurnick MSSI Presentation 11 October 2017

  2. Agenda 2 3 1 Operating Opportunities to Reviews Standards Participate | 2

  3. REVIEWS Agenda Item #1 | 3

  4. Reviews Timeline Calendar Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q2 2014 Q2 2016 GNSO2 Review GNSO2 Implementation Q4 2015 Q2 2018 CCT Review CCT Implementation Q1 2016 Q3 2018 At-Large2 Review At-Large2 Implementation Q2 2016 Q1 2019 SSR2 Review SSR2 Implementation Q4 2016 Q2 2019 RDS-WHOIS2 Review (formerly WHOIS2) RDS-WHOIS2 Implementation Q1 2017 Q3 2019 ATRT3 Review ATRT3 Implementation Q4 2016 Q1 2018 ASO2 Review ASO2 Implementation JAN 2017 Q1 2017 Q3 2018 NomCom2 Review NomCom2 Review NomCom2 Implementation Q2 2017 Q4 2018 RSSAC2 Review RSSAC Implementation Q2 2017 Q4 2018 SSAC2 Review SSAC2 Implementation Q4 2019 Q3 2018 Implemen ccNSO2 Review (pending Board action) tation TODAY SPECIFIC REVIEWS ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEWS Future dates are forecasted and subject to change LEGEND: | 4 Execution Implementation Execution Implementation

  5. Review Timing and Triggers ICANN Bylaws Article/Section 4.6 mandate the triggers that cause Specific Reviews to commence: (vi) The Accountability and Transparency Review shall be conducted no less frequently than every five years measured from the date the previous Accountability and Transparency Review Team was convened. (v) The SSR Review shall be conducted no less frequently than every five years, measured from the date the previous SSR Review Team was convened. (ii) After a New gTLD Round has been in operation for one year, the Board shall cause a competition, consumer trust and consumer choice review as specified in this Section 4.6(d) ("CCT Review"). (v) The Directory Service Review shall be conducted no less frequently than every five years, measured from the date the previous Directory Service Review Team was convened, except that the first Directory Service Review to be conducted after 1 October 2016 shall be deemed to be timely if the applicable Directory Service Review Team is convened on or before 31 October 2016. ICANN Bylaws Article/Section 4.4 mandate the triggers that cause Organizational Reviews to commence: Org Reviews: These periodic reviews shall be conducted no less frequently than every five years, based on feasibility as determined by the Board. Each five-year cycle will be computed from the moment of the reception by the Board of the final report of the relevant review Working Group. | 5

  6. 7 Phases for Specific Reviews Review Pre-Planning, Conduct the Review, 1 4 where the organization prepares includes analysis, assessment to support the Review and recommendation development Initialization and Board Consideration, 2 5 where the Final Report and Selection of the Review accompanying action plan is Team accepted or rejected Planning, where the Review Implementation and 3 6/7 Team develops its approach to Ongoing Support of the Review the recommendations | 6

  7. Overview of Observed* Issues Selection of Review Team – unclear checks and balances over skills and • diversity; difficult for people to participate if they are not already engaged and well known; hesitation by SO/AC to nominate people without understanding of scope of work and resulting time commitment and skills. Topics/Scope of Work – scope not finalized until the Review Team is • assembled may prevent people from applying to serve or cause Review Team members to participate less if Review demands turn out to be greater than envisioned. Simultaneous reviews – limited number of volunteers available to • participate, contributing to volunteer fatigue and significant burden carried by a few individuals. Unclear expectations – without a clear definition of desired outcome and • impact from Reviews, difficult to evaluate whether the Reviews are producing intended results. * Observed by ICANN community, ICANN Board and ICANN organization | 7

  8. CCT: Review Timeline and Progress Jun March Dec Dec August October 2018 2017 2017 2015 2017 2017 Announce Review Draft Report DNS Abuse Publish new Deliver Final Board Action Team selection Submitted Study (SADAG) sections of Draft Report to ICANN Board (ICANN Org) for Public results delivered. Report for public Comment comment Progress 86% Review Status: FY17 Q4 Budget 92% 60% Milestones Participation 69% * Estimated dates, subject to change | 8

  9. CCT Review Progress Report Activity Date Status Review Team agreed to work in plenary & 3 sub-teams: • Competition & Consumer Choice February 2016 • Safeguards & Trust • Application & Evaluation Process CCT Draft Report Published for Public Comment March 2017 GDD Input on implementability of recommendations May 2017 Publication of Report of Public Comments July 2017 New sections with findings and recommendations on October (TBC) Scheduled DNS Abuse, and INTA Study, sent for public comment 2017 Close date of Public Comment Period on “New Sections November (TBC) Scheduled of the Draft Report” 2017 Face-to-Face Meeting #8, public consultation (Abu Dhabi) ICANN60 Scheduled | 9

  10. SSR2: Review Timeline and Progress May – Oct – Feb Jan June Feb May Sept Jan 2018 2019 2018 2017 2017 2017 2018 Deliver Terms of Announce Review Publish Draft Deliver Final Board Action Collect and Formulate Team selection Reference to Report for public Report to analyze data findings & ICANN Board ICANN Board (ICANN Org) recommendations comment Progress 26% Review Status: FY17 Q4 Budget 41% Milestones 15% Participation 76% *Timeline is based on a current draft work plan. Estimated dates subject to change. | 10

  11. SSR2: Key Milestones Activity Date Status Review Team agreed to leadership by three Co-Chairs: • Denise Michel, GNSO March 2017 • Eric Osterweil, RSSAC • Emily Taylor, GNSO (resigned July 2017) Sub-groups formed and draft work topics identified. Five key areas of review: • SSR1 Implementation May 2017 • ICANN SSR • DNS SSR • Future Challenges • Impact of IANA transition on SSR Specifications for Gap Analysis of the Implementation of SSR1 September 2017 Review Recommendations published • Anticipated start date November 2017 9-10 October ICANN SSR sub-group face-to-face meeting (Los Angeles) 2017 Face-to-face meeting #4, public consultation, outreach meetings ICANN60 Scheduled with SO/AC groups (Abu Dhabi) Face-to-face meeting #5: Drafting session (Brussels) January 2018 Scheduled | 11

  12. RDS-WHOIS2: Review Timeline and Progress Apr – Nov – Aug Jun Dec Jun Nov Jul Mar 2018 2019 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018 Formulate findings Announce Review Collect and Publish Draft Deliver Final Board Action Deliver Terms of & recommendations Team selection analyze data Report for public Report to Reference to ICANN Board (ICANN Org) ICANN Board comment Progress 8% Review Status: FY17 Q4 Budget 17% Milestones 6% Participation 82% | 12 *Timeline is based on a current draft work plan. Estimated dates subject to change.

  13. RDS-WHOIS2: Key Milestones Activity Date Status Review Team announced June 2017 • Comprised of 14 members* 2-3 October Face-to-face meeting #1, Brussels 2017 Review Team agreed to leadership by Chair and two Vice Chairs: 2-3 October • Alan Greenberg (Chair) 2017 • Cathrin Bauer-Bulst (Vice-Chair) • Susan Kawaguchi (Vice-Chair) Scope, Terms of Reference, Work plan to be adopted and 24 November Scheduled sent to the Board 2017 * The ccNSO has reserved the right to appoint up to 3 Review Team members once the scope of the Review has been determined. | 13

  14. ATRT3: Key Milestones Activity Date Status Call for Volunteers for the Third Review of ICANN Accountability 31 January and Transparency (ATRT3) 2017 Extended Call for Volunteers closed 2 June 2017 SO and AC Leadership are in the process of selecting review team In-Progress members SO/AC Chairs to select review team TBD | 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend