Retrospective review of a blood culture identification panel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

retrospective review of a blood culture identification
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Retrospective review of a blood culture identification panel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Retrospective review of a blood culture identification panel implementation and its impact on antimicrobial therapy by organism morphology Colton Michael Taylor PGY1 Pharmacy Resident Providence Alaska Medical Center IRB Approval Received


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Retrospective review of a blood culture identification panel implementation and its impact on antimicrobial therapy by

  • rganism morphology

Colton Michael Taylor PGY1 Pharmacy Resident Providence Alaska Medical Center

IRB Approval Received 9/2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosure Statement

  • I, Colton Michael Taylor, have no conflict of interest and have received

no funding to support this project in its entirety.

  • This research is subject to different interpretation and is being

presented solely for educational purposes.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Learning Objectives

At the conclusion of this presentation, the reader should be able to:

  • 1). Recognize the utility of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based blood

pathogen panel in conjunction with an antimicrobial stewardship program.

  • 2). Understand opportunities for appropriate management of antimicrobial

regimens following implementation of a blood pathogen panel

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Institution

Providence Alaska Medical Center is a tertiary care community medical center located in Anchorage, Alaska

  • 403 beds
  • 36 ICU beds
  • Level II trauma center
  • Largest hospital in Alaska
  • Antimicrobial stewardship program
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pre-test assessment Questions

1). Blood culture identification (BCID) panels have been shown to be best utilized as part of a(n)?

  • A). Hospital system
  • B). Intensive care unit
  • C). Antimicrobial stewardship program
  • D). None of the above

2). BCID panels aid clinicians in making what decisions (select all that apply)?

  • A). Empiric antimicrobial regimens prior to blood being drawn
  • B). Discontinuation of antimicrobial regimens
  • C). De-escalation of empiric antimicrobial regimens, when used in conjunction with stewardship program
  • D). De-escalation/escalation of empiric antimicrobial regimens, when used in conjunction with stewardship

program

3). A negative BCID result could indicate which of the following (Select all that apply)?

  • A). The patient doesn’t have bacteremia/fungemia
  • B). The patient has bacteremia/fungemia with an organisms that aren’t detected by the BCID
  • C). The BCID is falsely negative, repeat the whole test
  • D). There was an error when processing the sample
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background

  • Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based blood culture identification

(BCID) is a rapid diagnostic tool utilized for patients with positive blood cultures

  • The BCID panel takes around two hours to identify microbes in positive blood

samples

  • It has the potential to reduce
  • Total antimicrobial doses
  • Duration of therapy
  • The time from blood draw to microbe identification when compared to traditional

culture methods

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Background

Blood sample

  • btained

Blood sample (+) in tube

Patient

(+) sample analyzed by BCID BCID Result (+) sample plated for incubation Finalization of cultures with sensitivities /susceptibilities ~12-24h ~1-2h Days ~0.5-1.5d 2-6d

Figure 1.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Gram-Positive Enterococcus

  • L. monocytogenes

Staphylococcus spp. Staphylococcus aureus Streptococcus spp. Streptococcus agalactiae Streptococcus pneumoniae Streptococcus pyogenes Gram-Negative Acinetobacter baumannii Haemophilus influenzae Neisseria meningitidis Pseudomonas aeruginosa Enterobacteriaceae Enterobacter cloacae complex Escherichia coli Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Proteus spp. Serratia marcescens Yeast Candida glabrata Candid krusei Candid parapsilosis Candida tropicalis Antimicrobial Resistance Genes MecA – Methicillin resistance VanA/B – Vancomycin resistance KPC – Carbapenem resistance

Figure 2. Organisms on BCID panel

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Study Objectives

  • Primary outcome measure
  • Time from positive blood culture identification to appropriate antimicrobial

therapy.

  • Secondary outcome measures
  • Time from initial blood culture to appropriate antimicrobial

therapy/escalation/de-escalation for gram positive and gram negative

  • rganisms separately
  • Percent of patients receiving effective therapy within 24 hours of a positive

blood culture

  • Hospital length of stay.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Methodology - Design

  • Study Design
  • Two cohorts: Pre-BCID implementation & Post-BCID Implementation
  • Retrospective review of patients with positive blood cultures for:
  • Gram positive cocci
  • Gram negative rods
  • Candida species
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Methodology – Inclusion/Exclusion

  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • ≥18yo
  • Hospitalized during the time of PCR analysis
  • Length of stay was ≥48hrs
  • Only first positive set of blood cultures
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Did not meet inclusion criteria
  • Had blood cultures drawn after antibiotics were administered
  • Patient didn’t have two separate sets of blood cultures drawn appropriately
  • Patients who had been discharged prior to blood culture positivity
slide-12
SLIDE 12

1,259 Patients Total Npre-BCID = 775 Npost-BCID = 484 Inclusion/Exclusion Npre-BCID = 230 Npost-BCID = 340

slide-13
SLIDE 13

DEMOGRAPHICS Group # Controls # Treatment 18-29 yo 16 (6.95%) 10 (2.94 %) 30-59yo

82 (35.65 %)

122 (35.88 %) 60-79 yo

89 (38.70 %)

156 (48.88 %) >/=80yo

43 (18.70 %)

52 (15.29 %) AVG AGE 61.6 61.9 Male

121 (52.61%)

173 (50.88 %) Female

109 (47.39 %)

167 (49.12 %) TOTAL # patients per group 230 340

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pre-BCID Post-BCID Average Duration of Therapy (Days) 8.6 6.4 Average total doses 18.4 15.8 Total “No changes” from empiric to final antibiotic decision 127 (55.2%) 264 (77.6%) GPC 99 (77.95%) 174 (65.9%) GNR 27 (21.3%) 85 (32.2%)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusion

  • The BCID can help reduce the following for patients with positive

blood cultures

  • Time to organism identification
  • Number of total doses
  • Total duration of antimicrobial therapy
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Discussion

  • Initial provider education was delayed
  • May require follow-up data
  • Overnight BCID samples
  • Increased time to result in some patients
  • Gram negative rods vs Gram positive cocci
  • Likely need more data to assess impact on antimicrobial regimens
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Post-test Assessment Questions

1). Blood culture identification panels have been shown to be best utilized as part of a(n)?

A). Hospital system B). Intensive care unit C). Antimicrobial stewardship program D). None of the above

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Post-test Assessment Questions

2). BCID panels aid clinicians in making what decisions (select all that apply)?

A). Empiric antimicrobial regimens prior to blood being drawn B). Discontinuation of antimicrobial regimens C). De-escalation of empiric antimicrobial regimens, when used in conjunction with stewardship program D). De-escalation/escalation of empiric antimicrobial regimens, when used in conjunction with stewardship program

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Post-test Assessment Questions

3). A negative BCID result could indicate which of the following (Select all that apply)?

A). The patient doesn’t have bacteremia/fungemia B). The patient has bacteremia/fungemia with an organisms that aren’t detected by the BCID C). The BCID is falsely negative, repeat the whole test D). There was an error when processing the sample