Rethinking Assessment of Student Engagement Kali Morgan Twister - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rethinking assessment of student engagement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Rethinking Assessment of Student Engagement Kali Morgan Twister - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Common Reading Rethinking Assessment of Student Engagement Kali Morgan Twister Marquiss, MFA Ph.D. Candidate Common Reading Program Director University of South Florida Texas State University Course Evals: Check Yes or No Question Fall


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Common Reading

Rethinking Assessment

  • f Student Engagement

Kali Morgan

Ph.D. Candidate University of South Florida

Twister Marquiss, MFA

Common Reading Program Director Texas State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Course Evals: Check Yes or No

Question Fall 2015 Fall 2016

Did you read the book?

84.97% 82.50%

Did you discuss themes with others?

73.63% 68.54%

Did you participate in an event/activity?

85.98% 81.98%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Narrative Engagement

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Portion of Text Read

Less than 1/4 More than 1/4
 but less than 1/2 More than 1/2
 but less than 3/4 More than 3/4 
 to all of book

33.6% 15.1% 16.1% 35.1%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assessment Results

Community Behaviors and Experiences · Students' classmates and friends · Faculty, staff, and TAs Program Engagement

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Narrative Engagement Results

Prior experiences with text's themes Story-Consistent Beliefs Narrative Engagement · Emotional Engagement

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Emotional Engagement

"Interruptions" to narrative experience Amount of time between the reading experience & survey completion Other influences to survey completion for this study

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Reading Matters!

Significant MANOVA and follow-up results for Portion of Text Read and: · Community with other students · Community with faculty & staff · Program Engagement · Emotional Engagement Non-significant: Story-Consistent Beliefs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Prior Experience Matters for Community

Significant MANOVA and follow-up results for Prior Experiences and: · Community with other students · Community with faculty & staff Non-significant: · Program Engagement · Emotional Engagement · Story-Consistent Beliefs

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Discussion

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Key Points

· Reading the book is critical! · In-class experiences are a major part of engagement · Prior experiences with the themes help start conversations · No evidence of story-consistent beliefs resulting directly from reading · Book can provoke emotional response

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Implications for Practice

Find creative ways to encourage students to read Talk about students' past experiences to build community Involve your FYS faculty in reviewing survey questions for story-consistent beliefs

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Implications for Research

Explore different timing and/or stages for survey completion in relation to reading experience Use framework with other common read books Conduct cognitive interviews with first-year students

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Questions?

Kali Morgan Ph.D. Candidate University of South Florida

kali5@mail.usf.edu

Twister Marquiss, MFA Common Reading Program Director Texas State University

twister@txstate.edu

Common Reading Program Texas State University

txstate.edu/bobcatbook #bobcatbook

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

MANOVA Portion of Text Read

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

MANOVA Prior Experiences

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25