residence time distributions as a measure for stochastic
play

Residence-time distributions as a measure for stochastic resonance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

W eierstra-Institut fr Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik Period of Concentration: Stochastic Climate Models MPI Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, 23 May 1 June 2005 Barbara Gentz Residence-time distributions as a measure for


  1. W eierstraß-Institut für Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik Period of Concentration: Stochastic Climate Models MPI Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, 23 May – 1 June 2005 Barbara Gentz Residence-time distributions as a measure for stochastic resonance WIAS Berlin, Germany gentz@wias-berlin.de www.wias-berlin.de/people/gentz

  2. Outline ⊲ A brief introduction to stochastic resonance – Example: Dansgaard–Oeschger events ⊲ First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR ⊲ Diffusion exit from a domain – Exponential asymptotics: Wentzell–Freidlin theory ⊲ Noise-induced passage through an unstable periodic orbit ⊲ The first-passage time density – Universality – Plots of the density: Cycling and synchronisation ⊲ The residence-time density – Definition and computation – Plots of the density Joint work with Nils Berglund (CPT–CNRS, Marseille) Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 1 (24)

  3. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance What is stochastic resonance (SR)? SR = mechanism to amplify weak signals in presence of noise Requirements ⊲ (background) noise ⊲ weak input ⊲ characteristic barrier or threshold (nonlinear system) Examples ⊲ periodic occurrence of ice ages (?) ⊲ Dansgaard–Oeschger events (?) ⊲ bidirectional ring lasers ⊲ visual and auditory perception ⊲ receptor cells in crayfish ⊲ . . . Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 2 (24)

  4. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Example: Dansgaard–Oeschger events GISP2 climate record for the second half of the last glacial [from: Rahmstorf, Timing of abrupt climate change: A precise clock , Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (2003)] ⊲ Abrupt, large-amplitude shifts in global climate during last glacial ⊲ Cold stadials; warm Dansgaard–Oeschger interstadials ⊲ Rapid warming; slower return to cold stadial ⊲ 1 470-year cycle? ⊲ Occasionally a cycle is skipped Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 3 (24)

  5. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Figure 2. Nils Berglu n d an d Barbara Gen tz Metastability in simple climate mo dels: Pathwise analysis of slow ly driven L angevin e quations The paradigm Overdamped motion of a Brownian particle . . . � � − x 3 d x t = t + x t + A cos( εt ) d t + σ d W t � �� � = − ∂ ∂xV ( x t , εt ) . . . in a periodically modulated double-well potential V ( x, s ) = 1 4 x 4 − 1 2 x 2 − A cos( s ) x , A < A c 2 Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 4 (24)

  6. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Sample paths A = 0 . 00 , σ = 0 . 30 , ε = 0 . 001 A = 0 . 10 , σ = 0 . 27 , ε = 0 . 001 A = 0 . 24 , σ = 0 . 20 , ε = 0 . 001 A = 0 . 35 , σ = 0 . 20 , ε = 0 . 001 Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 5 (24)

  7. A brief introduction to stochastic resonance Different parameter regimes Synchronisation I ⊲ For matching time scales: 2 π/ε = T forcing = 2 T Kramers ≍ e 2 H/σ 2 ⊲ Quasistatic approach: Transitions twice per period with high probability (physics’ literature; [Freidlin ’00], [Imkeller et al , since ’02]) ⊲ Requires exponentially long forcing periods Synchronisation II ⊲ For intermediate forcing periods: T relax ≪ T forcing ≪ T Kramers and close-to-critical forcing amplitude: A ≈ A c ⊲ Transitions twice per period with high probability ⊲ Subtle dynamical effects: Effective barrier heights [Berglund & G ’02] SR outside synchronisation regimes ⊲ Only occasional transitions ⊲ But transition times localised within forcing periods Unified description / understanding of transition between regimes ? Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 6 (24)

  8. First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR Qualitative measures for SR How to measure combined effect of periodic and random perturbations? Spectral-theoretic approach Probabilistic approach ⊲ Power spectrum ⊲ Distribution of interspike times ⊲ Spectral power amplification ⊲ Distribution of first-passage times ⊲ Signal-to-noise ratio ⊲ Distribution of residence times Look for periodic component in density of these distributions Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 7 (24)

  9. First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR Interspike times for Dansgaard–Oeschger events Histogram for “waiting times” [from: Alley, Anandakrishnan, Jung, Stochastic resonance in the North Atlantic , Paleoceanography 16 (2001)] Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 8 (24)

  10. First-passage-time distributions as a qualitative measure for SR Interwell transitions Deterministic motion in a periodically modulated double-well potential ⊲ 2 stable periodic orbits tracking bottoms of wells ⊲ 1 unstable periodic orbit tracking saddle ⊲ Unstable periodic orbit separates basins of attraction Brownian particle in a periodically modulated double-well potential ⊲ Interwell transitions characterised by crossing of unstable orbit x well saddle t periodic orbit well Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 9 (24)

  11. x Diffusion exit from a domain � D Exit problem x 0 x det = f ( x det x 0 ∈ R d Deterministic ODE ˙ t ) t Small random perturbation d x t = f ( x t ) d t + σ d W t D (same initial cond. x 0 ) Bounded domain D ∋ x 0 (with smooth boundary) τ = τ D = inf { t > 0: x t �∈ D} ⊲ first-exit time ⊲ first-exit location x τ ∈ ∂ D Distribution of τ and x τ ? Interesting case D positively invariant under deterministic flow Approaches ⊲ Mean first-exit times and locations via PDEs ⊲ Exponential asymptotics via Wentzell–Freidlin theory Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 10 (24) 1

  12. Diffusion exit from a domain Exponential asymptotics: Wentzell–Freidlin theory I Assumptions (for this slide) ⊲ D positively invariant ⊲ unique, asympt. stable equilibrium point at 0 ∈ D ⊲ ∂ D ⊂ basin of attraction of 0 Concepts ⊲ Rate function / action functional : � t I [0 ,t ] ( ϕ ) = 1 ϕ s − f ( ϕ s ) � 2 d s for ϕ ∈ H 1 , � ˙ I [0 ,t ] ( ϕ ) = + ∞ otherwise 2 0 Probability ∼ exp {− I ( ϕ ) } to observe sample paths close to ϕ (LDP) ⊲ Quasipotential: Cost to go against the flow from 0 to z t> 0 inf { I [0 ,t ] ( ϕ ): ϕ ∈ C ([0 , t ] , R d ) , ϕ 0 = 0 , ϕ t = z } V (0 , z ) = inf ⊲ Minimum of quasipotential on boundary ∂ D : V := min z ∈ ∂ D V (0 , z ) Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 11 (24)

  13. Diffusion exit from a domain Exponential asymptotics: Wentzell–Freidlin theory II Theorem [Wentzell & Freidlin � ’70] For arbitrary initial condition in D ⊲ Mean first-exit time E τ ∼ e V /σ 2 as σ → 0 ⊲ Concentration of first-exit times � e ( V − δ ) /σ 2 � τ � e ( V + δ ) /σ 2 � → 1 as σ → 0 P (for arbitrary δ > 0 ) ⊲ Concentration of exit locations near minima of quasipotential Gradient case (reversible diffusion) Drift coefficient deriving from potential: f = −∇ V ⊲ Cost for leaving potential well: V = 2 H H ⊲ Attained for paths going against the flow: ϕ t = − f ( ϕ t ) ˙ Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 12 (24)

  14. Diffusion exit from a domain z Refined results in the gradient case x 1 Simplest case: V double-well potential x 0 First-hitting time τ hit of deeper well ⊲ E x 1 τ hit = c ( σ ) e 2 [ V ( z ) − V ( x 1 )] / σ 2 � | det ∇ 2 V ( z ) | 2 π ⊲ lim σ → 0 c ( σ ) = exists ! det ∇ 2 V ( x 1 ) λ 1 ( z ) λ 1 ( z ) unique negative e.v. of ∇ 2 V ( z ) (Physics’ literature: [Eyring ’35], [Kramers ’40]; [Bovier, Gayrard, Eckhoff, Klein ’02]) ⊲ Subexponential asymptotics known ! Related to geometry at well and saddle / small eigenvalues of the generator ([Bovier et al ’02], [Helffer, Klein, Nier ’04]) � τ hit > t E τ hit � ⊲ τ hit ≈ exp. distributed: lim = e − t 1 σ → 0 P ([Day ’82], [Bovier et al ’02]) Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 13 (24)

  15. Noise-induced passage through an unstable periodic orbit New phenomena for drift not deriving from a potential? Simplest situation of interest Nontrivial invariant set which is a single periodic orbit Assume from now on d = 2 , ∂ D = unstable periodic orbit ⊲ E τ ∼ e V /σ 2 still holds [Day ’90] ⊲ Quasipotential V (0 , z ) ≡ V is constant on ∂ D : Exit equally likely anywhere on ∂ D (on exp. scale) ⊲ Phenomenon of cycling [Day ’92] : Distribution of x τ on ∂ D generally does not converge as σ → 0 . Density is translated along ∂ D proportionally to | log σ | . ⊲ In stationary regime : (obtained by reinjecting particle) d � � x t ∈ D has | log σ | -periodic prefactor [Maier & Stein ’96] Rate of escape d t P Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 14 (24)

  16. Noise-induced passage through an unstable periodic orbit Back to SR d x t = − ∂ ∂xV ( x t , εt ) d t + σ d W t where V ( x, s ) is a periodically modulated double-well potential V ( x, s ) = 1 4 x 4 − 1 2 x 2 − A cos( s ) x , A < A c ⊲ Time t as auxiliary variable → 2-dimensional system ⊲ Deterministic system: 3 periodic orbits tracking bottoms of wells and saddle ⊲ 2 stable, 1 unstable ⊲ Unstable periodic orbit separates basins of attraction ⊲ Choose D as interior of unstable periodic orbit ⊲ ∂ D is unstable periodic orbit Degenerate case: No noise acting on auxiliary variable Stochastic climate models 23 May – 1 June 2005 15 (24)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend