Regional Connectivity and the TEN-T Network The TEN-TaNS project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

regional connectivity and the ten t network
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Regional Connectivity and the TEN-T Network The TEN-TaNS project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Regional Connectivity and the TEN-T Network The TEN-TaNS project Meeting: NSRP Confernce, June 2015 Name: Philip Smart Position: European Transport Strategy Company Aberdeenshire Council Phone: +44 1224 66 4819 Email:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Regional Connectivity and the TEN-T Network

The TEN-TaNS project

1

  • 17. Juni 2015

Meeting: NSRP Confernce, June 2015 Name: Philip Smart Position: European Transport Strategy Company Aberdeenshire Council Phone: +44 1224 66 4819 Email: Philip.smart@Aberdeenshire.gov.uk

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TEN-TaNS Philip Smart Project Manager

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Welcome to the TEN-TaNS toolbox (beta version)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Select a transport mode. Select one of the possible corresponding cluster themes

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Click on „SELECT“ to open the result page for this combination. Description of the content of the chosen combination. Different possible information themes.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Click on the PDF icon to

  • pen the case

study.

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Click on the funding icon to open a list of CEF related funding possibilities.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

List of information about funding possibilities and their corresponding links.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Click on the legislation icon to open a list of corresponding European legislation and (some) national rules.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

List of European and legislation and their corresponding links – also some national level information.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Click on the icon to see a list of similar projects. List containing information about projects operating in the same field.

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Stakeholder consultation on the mid-term review of the 2011 White Paper on transport The white paper identified three objectives:

  • A reduction of GHG emissions .Transport-

related emissions of CO2 should be reduced by around 60% by 2050 compared to 1990.

  • A drastic decrease in the oil dependency ratio
  • f transport-related activities by 2050,
  • Limiting the growth of congestion.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

… And proposed 10 goals

  • 1. Halve the use of conventionally fuelled cars in urban transport by 2030;
  • 2. 40% low carbon sustainable fuels in aviation by 2050; reduce EU CO2 emissions

from maritime bunker fuels by 40% by 2050.

  • 3. Shift 30% of road freight above 300 km to rail and waterborne by 2030.
  • 4. Triple the existing high-speed rail network by 2030. The majority of medium-

distance passenger transport should go by rail by 2050.

  • 5. Complete the TEN-T ‘core’ network by 2030 with a corresponding set of

information services.

  • 6. Multimodal connections between all core network airports and rail, core seaports

and rail freight and inland waterways by 2050.

  • 7. Deployment of traffic management infrastructure and systems in the various

modes.

  • 8. Development of the framework for a European multimodal transport information

management and payment system by 2020.

  • 9. Halve road casualties by 2020, move close to zero fatalities by 2050.
  • 10. Move towards full application of ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’
slide-24
SLIDE 24

CPMR response 2011

2.1 – The White Paper fails to consider territorial cohesion 2.2 – The White Paper underestimates the extent to which maritime transport needs to be supported if carbon reduction goals are to be achieved 3.4 – Smart pricing and taxation : The internalisation of external costs for polluting modes

  • f transport must both:

Create scope to finance “clean” modes of transport and therefore maritime transport, for both infrastructure and services; Take account of specific territorial circumstances

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Key messages

  • f the 2015 CPMR response
  • An additional (11th) goal should be introduced :

improving accessibility,

  • Insufficient consideration has been given so far to

islands and outermost regions.

  • Sustainability is another priority : but EU legislation

sometimes leads to retro modalshift - the priority given to the central regions by the CEF will neither reduce emissions nor limit congestion

  • The question of infrastructure charging therefore needs

to be examined at EU level as a matter of urgency. New sources of funding need to be imagined to encourage sustainable modes of transport and help the least accessible territories.

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

For further questions please contact:

Thank you for your attention

  • 17. Juni 2015

Name: Philip Smart Position: European Transport Strategy Company Aberdeenshire Council Phone: +44 1224 66 4819 Email: philip.smart@aberdeenhisre.gov.uk

TEN-TaNS

Thank-you for your attention