Refreshing our Home Jacob Estrin Graeme Whitaker Elizabeth Sackson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

refreshing our home
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Refreshing our Home Jacob Estrin Graeme Whitaker Elizabeth Sackson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Refreshing our Home Jacob Estrin Graeme Whitaker Elizabeth Sackson Aleisha Dunn QUT Consulting Problem How do we realize the profitability from our disruptive initiative while maintaining market leadership? Overview Analysis Alternatives


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Refreshing our Home

Jacob Estrin Elizabeth Sackson Graeme Whitaker Aleisha Dunn

QUT Consulting

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Problem

How do we realize the profitability from our disruptive initiative while maintaining market leadership?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Key Issues

  • Internal operations
  • Costs 196% of revenue
  • Core business costs
  • Distribution costs
  • Supplier relationships
  • Market demands
  • End to end service
  • Potential for market disruption
  • Furniture rental market
  • Customer value proposition
  • Competition
  • International
  • Domestic
  • Competitive advantage
  • Value proposition
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Solution

Simplify the business model to improve profitability while retaining supplier relationships.

Effective Affordable Achievable Core Values

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Macro trends

  • Growing middle class becoming more aesthetically home conscious
  • Increased willingness to buy online – but want the option of touch

and feel

  • Large disorganised network of artisans – reduced digital literacy or

means to scale product

  • Increased number of horizontal platforms – but limited desire to

discern quality of products or restrict offerings

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Strengths and weaknesses of Pepperfry

  • Key strengths
  • Supplier relationships
  • Analytics driven inventory and pricing model
  • Building brand awareness and customer loyalty
  • Large foothold across India – 34 stores and 5M visitors
  • Governance and KPIs
  • Vertical integration
  • Weaknesses
  • Currently running at a loss – driven by operational costs
  • Supplier complexity
  • Inability to pinpoint operational efficiencies
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Competitor analysis

Competitors Customer experience Product cost Distribution network Bespoke product Product range Product quality Ikea

 ✓    

Flipcart

  ✓  ✓ 

Amazon

  ✓  ✓ 

Urban ladder

 ✓    

Livspace

✓   ✓  ✓

Pepperfry

✓  ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Value proposition - status associated with bespoke artisan products delivered to your door and superior customer experience

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Financial performance

Utilities Décor Furniture

Listings

70,000 10,000

Ave price

1,500 2,500 18,000

% revenue

20% 80%

% of transactions

0.5% 70% 30%

Gross margin

15% 40% 50%

GMV

5,122 6,500

Revenue

$ - $8,899,475 $35,100,000

Profit

$ - $3,559,790 $17,550,000

  • 4000
  • 3000
  • 2000
  • 1000

1000 2000 3000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Revenue Profit/loss

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Alternatives

Sustainable re- leasing of used furniture Move to a B2B model with distribution only Create an interior design subscription model Simplify the business model to improve profitability

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Alternative Analysis

Option Cost Timeframe Success Criteria Factor Sustainable re-leasing of used furniture $75M - $100M INR 36 Months

2.3

Move to a B2B model with distribution only $200M - $250M INR (Lost Revenue) 24 Months

2.0

Create an Interior Design Subscription model $25M – $50M INR 12 Months

2.1

Simplify the business model to improve profitability $161M INR 15 Months

3.0

Effective Affordable Achievable Core Values

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Solution

Simplify the business model to improve profitability while retaining supplier relationships.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Solution Pillars

Divest container manufacturing Franchise the last mile delivery Simplify

  • nboarding of

New Suppliers Operational efficiency review

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Implementation Overview

Divest container manufacturing (6 months)

Document all procedures and policies Identify other potential customers Locate buyers Change management

Franchise last mile delivery (15 months)

Attract local drivers with trucks Strict performance criteria linked to bonus program

Simplify onboarding

  • f new suppliers (6

months)

Standardized

  • nboarding material

Mentorship program

Operational efficiency review (9 months)

Management effectiveness Process efficiency Operational cost review

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Divest Container Manufacturing

Item Timeframe Define and document as-is Identify and contract other potential customers Locate potential buyers Prep conditions for sale Negotiation and sale Ongoing change management

3 months 3 months 3 months 6 months 3 months 3 months

Total Cost: 25.6 INR (6 Months/ 6 FTE)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Last Mile Delivery

Item Timeframe Develop standards Develop terms and conditions Locate 1st round of franchisees Training and onboarding Monitoring and post implementation support Check and adjust period Locate 2nd round of franchisees

3 months 1 month 3 months 3 months 1 month 6 months

Total Cost: 64M INR (10 Months/ 8 FTE)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Simplify onboarding of new suppliers

Item Timeframe Create online learning Create supplier manual Vet with existing suppliers Check and adjust Develop a network of coaches Train customer service staff Go Live Check and adjust

3 months 3 months 1 month 1 month 1 month 1 month 3 months

Total Cost:58.7 INR (6 Months/ 4 FTE)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Operational efficiency review

Item Timeframe Develop activity based costing model Process map all core processes Identify target areas for improvement Develop Solutions Develop business case Go/No Go

6 months 2months 1 month 6 months 1 month

Total Cost: 12.8 INR (9 Months/ 10 FTE)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Risk Analysis

Risk Risk Rating Mitigation Mitigated Risk Rating Can’t find a buyer for container manufacturer Medium Identify other potential customers Low Degradation of delivery quality Medium/High

  • Strict performance

Criteria

  • Monitoring the system
  • Training

Low/Medium Loss of stickiness with suppliers Medium

  • Pulse Surveys
  • Monitor Attrition Rate

Low/Medium Operational costs not reduced Medium

  • Close analysis of
  • perational costs
  • Dedicated project

team Low

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Contingency Plan

If we cannot divest the container manufacturing business, split it off to become it’s own entity and expand the business to include other companies. If franchising of last mile does not receive sufficient uptake, review options for selling.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Projected financial metrics

2017 2020 Last mile delivery Damage cost 2.0% 2.0% Operational cost 6.0% Supply cost 4.0% Total 8.0% 6.0% Container Manufacturing Damage cost 0.0% 0.5% Operational cost 2.0% Supply cost 0.5% Total 2.0% 1.0% Supplier relationship Operational cost 40.0% 4.0% Core operations Operational costs 146.0% 74.0% TOTAL 196.0% 85.0%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Projected revenue and profit/loss

  • 10000

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Revenue Profit/loss

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

What’s New What’s Dead What’s Staying

Focus

  • Focus resources on our key value creation
  • Vertical Integration of the supply chain
  • Our core value creation with a focus on strength
  • Our Supplier Relationship – but streamlined and

efficient

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Problem

How do we realize the profitability from our disruptive initiative while maintaining market leadership?

Solution

Simplify the business model to improve profitability while retaining supplier relationships

Outcome Future

The ability to focus our resources and increase profitability Realize benefits from increased revenue The ability to generate more revenue which will result in more profit and potential for a successful future IPO by 2025

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Questions

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Overview Analysis Alternatives Recommendation Implementation Conclusion

Options Selection Matrix

Option Effective Affordable Achievable Core Values (Variety and Value) Total Sustainable re- leasing of used furniture 2 2 2 3 2.3 Move to a B2B model with distribution only 3 3 1 1 2.0 Create an Interior Design Subscrption model 1 2 2.5 3 2.1 Simplify the business model to improve profitability 3 3 3 3 3.0

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Assumptions

  • Distribution partners can deliver the same service level
  • Rental furniture market is less attractive and will be slow to gain

traction as a substitute in the market

  • Indian artisan products will continue to remain attractive to the

consumer

  • House brands will continue to grow and remain profitable
  • We will be able to maintain gross profit margins for the interim –

buyers will be willing to pay for a superior product

  • Existing suppliers will be reluctant to engage with new entrants due

to the nature of the Indian business relationships

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Competitive landscape

Omnichannel Vertical Offline Online Horizontal Pepperfry Pepperfry Amazon Livspace Ikea SMEs