Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and Integrated Maritime - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reform of the common fisheries policy and integrated
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and Integrated Maritime - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and Integrated Maritime Considerations Dr. Till Markus, LL.M. Research Centre for European Environmental Law Bremen Graduate School for Marine Sciences 1 Outline I. Structure and Development of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and Integrated Maritime Considerations

  • Dr. Till Markus, LL.M.

Research Centre for European Environmental Law Bremen Graduate School for Marine Sciences

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

I. Structure and Development of the CFP II. Why do we need a reform? III. Analysing deficits and Commission proposals

  • IV. Integrating the CFP into a broader

maritime policy V. Comments

  • VI. Conclusion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

CFP - Structure & Development

CFP

Market Management Structural External Competence Control and Enforcement Measures (Dual Vigilance) Member States Implementation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Why Do We Need a Reform?

  • 88% of the stocks are fished above MSY
  • 30% of the stocks are fished outside SBL
  • Many stocks remain underassessed
  • Increasing environmental pressures and

increasing competition with other demands

  • More than ½ of consumed fish is imported
  • 2002 objectives have not been met overall
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Analysing Deficits and Commission Proposals

  • Overcapacities
  • Imprecise policy objectives
  • Decision-making framework
  • More rights and responsibilites to industry
  • Compliance
  • Other suggestions…
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Integrating CFP into a broader maritime policy

  • Fisheries sector interacts with other

maritime sectors

  • Caveats
  • Integrating into the MSFD
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Comments

  • Many proposed measures have been

proposed before or could already be adopted under the existing regime

  • Avoid oversimplification and

contradictions

  • Increase accountability
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Conclusion

  • Vivid debate is required comprising all

views of all parties

  • We need to be open towards change
  • Where cut-backs are necessary, good

alternatives must offered to stakeholders

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Thank you for your attention!

tmarkus@uni-bremen.de