Refining the conformational ensembles of flexible proteins using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

refining the conformational ensembles of flexible
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Refining the conformational ensembles of flexible proteins using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Refining the conformational ensembles of flexible proteins using simulation-guided spectroscopy Jennifer M. Hays Blue Waters Symposium June 3 2018 Acknowledgements Columbus Lab Kasson Lab Linda Columbus, PhD Peter Kasson, MD,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Refining the conformational ensembles of flexible proteins using simulation-guided spectroscopy

Jennifer M. Hays Blue Waters Symposium June 3 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Acknowledgements

  • Kasson Lab
  • Peter Kasson, MD, PhD
  • Ricardo Ferriera, PhD
  • Eric Irrgang, PhD
  • Kenta Okamoto, PhD
  • Ana Pabis, PhD
  • Anjali Senger, PhD
  • Cara Broshkevitch
  • Columbus Lab
  • Linda Columbus, PhD
  • Marissa Kieber, PhD
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Information on conformational heterogeneity Information on many degrees

  • f freedom

Flexible proteins are hard to study because many states contribute to their conformational ensembles

X-ray crystallography MD Simulations FRET DEER

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Iterative refinement leverages both computation and experiment

Integrate experimental data using computation

I t

Perform experiments Identify informative experiments

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Opa-CEACAM interaction

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(3):498-514

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How we study binding: DEER

  • Double electron-electron

resonance (DEER) provides distance distributions between pairs of spin-labeled amino acids

  • Great! Captures conformational

heterogeneity of Opa ensemble

  • Problem: DEER only reports on

a few DOF in the system, but we need on the order of ~10,000 measurements

slide-7
SLIDE 7

We want two things from

  • ur pairs:
  • 1. maximally informative on

the conformational ensemble

  • 2. are minimally redundant

with each other

mRMR Algorithm

Integrate experimental data using computation

I t

Perform experiments Identify informative experiments

b)

(maximum-relevancy, minimum redundancy) Hays et al., Submitted

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ensemble distribution Experimental distribution

. . .

→ →

Update the pull potential: Restart simulations

Integrate experimental data using computation

I t

Perform experiments Identify informative experiments

Integration of spectroscopic data

b) a)

Distance (nm) Probability

MD Initial DEER 31 - 166 88 - 162 77 - 107 117 - 107

Hays et al., Submitted

After 100 ns of simulation per ensemble member (2 μs aggregate) , approximately converge to target

slide-9
SLIDE 9

As a teaser…

Distance (A) Probability

Time (ns) Time (ns)

A) B)

Probability

J-S Divergence J-S Divergence

DEER 2.5 ns 100 ns 200 ns

Integrate experimental data using computation

I t

Perform experiments Identify informative experiments

Current method not robust enough to handle well-separated probability modes Come see my poster tonight for more details!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

How well-refined are the resulting ensembles?

SSP mRMR: 1st round mRMR: 2nd round

40 30 20 10

33-159 39-176 90-172 38-163 36-91 85-171 23-163 82-166 Inverse J-S Divergence Hays et al., Submitted

slide-11
SLIDE 11

C)

SV extended: 40 % HV2 extended: 20 % Multiple loop extensions: 40 %

1

Two rounds of simulation-guided spectroscopy generate a hypothesis for CEACAM engagement

Hays et al., Submitted Opa loops have three regions of high variability: SV (tan), HV1 (green) , HV2 (red)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HV2-extended conformations are selected during CEACAM engagement

A) B)

28 - 159 (SV - HV2) 80 - 166 (HV1 - HV2)

50.6 A 45.2 A

THR159 ASN166 ASN80 GLU28 Distance (A)

HV2 HV1 SV

Hays et al., Submitted

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary

  • By incorporating optimally-selected

DEER pairs into MD simulation, we have obtained a conformational ensemble of apo Opa that suggests clear possible modes of CEACAM engagement

  • Further refinement of the bound

ensemble

  • binding experiments to determine

which loop(s) CEACAM binds: HV2

  • r the HV1/SV interface?
  • additional simulations +CEACAM

DEER experiments Restrained- ensemble simulations Incorporate distributions into simulations Identify highly informative pairs

I t

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank you Questions?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Additional Slides

slide-16
SLIDE 16

4 2

a) b) c) d)

Pair-confjguration MI

200 200

slide-17
SLIDE 17

a) b)

Opa 31-166 Opa 88-162 Opa 77-107 Opa 107-117 162 166 88 31 107 117 77

High conformational heterogeneity pairs Low conformational heterogeneity pairs

t (μs) Distance (nm) Intensity t (μs) Distance (nm) 2 entropy = 4.71 nats entropy = 4.64 nats entropy = 4.45 nats entropy = 4.34 nats

0.95 1.00

2

0.95 1.00 0.90 1.00

Intensity 2 4

1.00 0.90

4 2

DEER experiments Restrained- ensemble simulations Incorporate distributions into simulations Identify highly informative pairs

I t
slide-18
SLIDE 18

20 30 10

mRMR: 2nd round mRMR: 1st round SSP Dimensionality of conformational ensemble

2 4 6

Information-theoretic coarseness (1-ε)

8 10

x10-5 Coarse Fine