Recycling Rate of Atmospheric Moisture Over the Past Two Decades - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

recycling rate of atmospheric moisture over the past two
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Recycling Rate of Atmospheric Moisture Over the Past Two Decades - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Recycling Rate of Atmospheric Moisture Over the Past Two Decades (1988-2009) Xun Jiang 1 , Liming Li 1 , Moustafa Chahine 2 , Edward Olsen 2 , Eric Fetzer 2 , Luke Chen 2 , and Yuk Yung 3 1 Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Recycling Rate of Atmospheric Moisture Over the Past Two Decades (1988-2009)

Xun Jiang1, Liming Li1, Moustafa Chahine2, Edward Olsen2, Eric Fetzer2, Luke Chen2, and Yuk Yung3

1 Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Houston 2 Science Division, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech 3 Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, Caltech

NASA Sounder Science Team Meeting, Nov 8-11, 2011

Li, L., X. Jiang, M. Chahine, E. Olsen, E. Fetzer, L. Chen, and Y. Yung, 2011: Recycling rate of atmospheric mositure over the past two decades (1988-2009), Environmental Research Letters, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034017.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Motivation
  • Data
  • Variations in Precipitation, Water Vapor, and Recycling

Rate

  • Conclusions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

  • The recycling rate of atmospheric moisture is an

important index of the climate change.

  • Spatial patterns of temporal variations in

precipitation, water vapor, and recycling rate will be helpful to understand the hydrological cycle as a response to the global warming, and provide constraints for the climate models.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Data

  • 1. Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) V2.1 -- Global

Spatial: 2.5º× 2.5º; Temporal: 1979-2009

  • 2. Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) V6 -- Ocean

Spatial: 0.25º× 0.25º; Temporal: 1988-present

I) Precipitation II) Water Vapor

  • 1. SSM/I V6 -- Ocean

Spatial: 0.25º× 0.25º; Temporal: 1988-present

  • 2. Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS; Global) and Advanced

Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR; Ocean) V5 Spatial: 1º× 1º; Temporal: 2002-present

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Recycling Rate

Recycling Rate = Total Monthly Precipitation Mean Precipitable Water Vapor

[Chahine et al., 1997]

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Precipitation and Water Vapor

ΔP (mm/mon) ΔW (mm/mon)

(A) Deseasonalized time series of oceanic precipitation from GPCP V2.1 and SSM/I. (B) Deseasonalized time series of oceanic water vapor from SSM/I, AIRS, and AMSR-E. 60°S – 60°N Ocean

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Variations in Recycling Rate, Precipitation, and Water Vapor

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Trends in Precipitation and Water Vapor

Deseasonalized & Lowpass Filtered Timeseries SSM/I+GPCP: 0.26 ± 0.41 %/decade GPCP: 0.08 ± 0.43 %/decade SSM/I: 1.01 ± 0.39 %/decade

Weak linear trend in precipitation is much smaller than the linear trend (1.4 ± 0.5% per decade) in the previous study (Wentz et al., 2007).

[Li et al., ERL 2011]

90°S – 90°N

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Trends in Oceanic Precipitation, Water Vapor, and Recycling Rates

Deseasonalized & Lowpass Filtered Timeseries (Ocean) ENSO Signals have been removed by a multiple regression method. SSM/I: 0.13 ± 0.63 %/decade GPCP: 0.33 ± 0.54 %/decade SSM/I: 0.97 ± 0.37 %/decade

Recycling 1: -0.82 ± 1.11 %/decade Recycling 2: -0.65 ± 0.51 %/decade Recycling 1 = (SSM/I P)/(SSM/I W) Recycling 2 = (GPCP P)/(SSM/I W)

60°S – 60°N

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Trend in Recycling Rate

Recycling Rate1 = (SSM/I Precipitation)/(SSM/I H2O) Recycling Rate2 = (GPCP Precipitation)/(SSM/I H2O)

Recycling Rate of atmospheric moisture has intensified in the ITCZ and weakened in the nearby areas.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Trends in Precipitation and Water Vapor

Precipitation Water Vapor

Precipitation has increased (decreased) in the high (low) precipitation areas. Magnitude of temporal variations is stronger in the precipitation than in the water vapor.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Spatial Pattern of the Mean Precipitation for 1988-2008

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Temporal Variations of Precipitation over High & Low Precipitation Areas

ENSO Signals have been removed by a multiple regression method.

3.0 ± 1.3 %/decade

  • 4.7 ± 3.6 %/decade
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Conclusions

1) The oceanic recycling rate of atmospheric moisture has decreased over the past two decades. Trend in the oceanic precipitation is smaller than the trend in the oceanic water

  • vapor. AIRS global water vapor data can help better explore

the global recycling rate in the future. 2) Recycling rate has increased in the ITCZ and decreased in the neighboring regions over the past two decades. 3) Temporal variation is stronger in precipitation than in water vapor, which results to the positive (negative) trend of recycling rate in the high (low) precipitation region.

References: Li, L., X. Jiang, M. Chahine, E. Olsen, E. Fetzer, L. Chen, and Y. Yung, 2011: Recycling rate of atmospheric mositure over the past two decades (1988-2009), Environmental Research Letters, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034017.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Thank you!