recurrence relations and inequalities
play

Recurrence Relations and Inequalities Stefan Gerhold RISC - PDF document

Recurrence Relations and Inequalities Stefan Gerhold RISC (Research Institute for Symbolic Computation) Linz/Hagenberg, Austria Proving Inequalities by Computer Algebra (with M. Kauers, ISSAC 2005) We want to prove a n > 0, n 0


  1. Recurrence Relations and Inequalities Stefan Gerhold RISC (Research Institute for Symbolic Computation) Linz/Hagenberg, Austria

  2. Proving Inequalities by Computer Algebra (with M. Kauers, ISSAC 2005) • We want to prove a n > 0, n ≥ 0 • a n polynomially recursive (not necessarily holonomic) a n + s = P ( a n , . . . , a n + s − 1 ) , n ≥ 0 . Example: 2 2 n • induction step a n > 0 , . . . , a n + r − 1 > 0 = ⇒ a n + r > 0 • Sufficient: X 0 > 0 , . . . , X r − 1 > 0 = ⇒ X r > 0 ( ∗ ) for all real numbers X 0 , . . . , X r that satisfy polyno- mial equations arising from the recurrence of a n . • Increase r , if formla ( ∗ ) does not hold; or encode known inequalities/identities as additional inequalities/equations for the X k .

  3. Proving Inequalities by Computer Algebra • a n may involve undetermined parameters • Works on many examples (Cauchy-Schwarz, Bernoulli, Tur´ an, . . . ) • But no a priori termination criterion known • Example gallery (omitting some constraints): ( x + 1) n ≥ 1 + nx, n ≥ 0 , x ≥ − 2 (!) P n ( x ) 2 − P n − 1 ( x ) P n +1 ( x ) ≥ 0 � n n n � 2 � � � x 2 y 2 x k y k ≤ k k k =1 k =1 k =1 n n � � (1 − a k ) > 1 − a k k =1 k =1 � n n k − 1 � 2 � � � ( n − 1) a k ≥ 2 n a k a i k =1 k =1 i =1 � � � � √ 1 < √ n + 1 � � � n + ( n − 1) + · · · + 2 +

  4. Linear Recurrences with Constant Coef- ficients • Is there a subclass over which positivity is decidable? • C-finite sequences are a natural candidate: c 0 a n + c 1 a n +1 + · · · + c d a n + d = 0 , n ≥ 0 . • Question: a n > 0, n large? • power sum representation d � b k α n a n = k , k =1 α k roots of characteristic polynomial (assumed to be simple here). • dominating roots := roots of largest modulus • Usually the sign is trivial: 3 n + ( − 2) n > 0 ( − 3) n + ( − 2) n ≶ 0

  5. Sequences with no Positive Dominating Root • What is the sign of (2 + i) n + (2 − i) n ? • (Side remark: Lower estimate 5 n/ 2 /n C < | (2 + i) n + (2 − i) n | Schinzel 1967, based on Baker’s theorem about linear forms in logarithms) • Conjecture: infinitely many sign changes, if no dom- inating root is positive. • 1 dominating root: trivial (root has to be real nega- tive) • 2 dominating roots: Burke, Webb 1981 Example: (2 + i) n + (2 − i) n ≶ 0 • 3 or 4 dominating roots: SG 2005 (By Diophantine geometry) Example: √ 5) n + (2 + i) n + (2 − i) n ≶ 0 ( −

  6. Sequences with no Positive Dominating Root: Two Pairs of Conjugated Roots • a n = w 1 sin(2 πnθ 1 + ϕ 1 ) + w 2 sin(2 πnθ 2 + ϕ 2 ) • Example: ( θ 1 , θ 2 ) = ( 7 10 , 1 5 ) • The set { (7 n/ 10 , n/ 5) mod 1 : n ∈ ◆ } • Every square with side length 1 / 2, parallel to the axes, contains a point (Minkowsi’s theorem from Dio- phantine geometry) • Hence (sin(2 πnθ 1 + ϕ 1 ) , sin(2 πnθ 2 + ϕ 2 )) assumes all four sign combinations (+1 , +1) , (+1 , − 1) , ( − 1 , +1) , ( − 1 , − 1) . • Hence a n oscillates for all w 1 , w 2 (not both zero).

  7. Sequences with no Positive Dominating Root: General Case • Theorem (Bell, SG 2005): Let a n be a C-finite se- quence, not identically zero, with no positive dom- inating root. Then the sets { n : a n > 0 } and { n : a n < 0 } have positive density. • Theorem (Kronecker, Weyl): The sequence ( nθ 1 , . . . , nθ m ) is uniformly distributed modulo 1, if the numbers 1 , θ 1 , . . . , θ m are linearly independent over ◗ . • Idea: Study the function of t resulting from a n upon replacing each nθ k by a real t k . • The other “extreme case”: all θ k are rational. Let q be a common denominator. q − 1 q − 1 m � � � a j = w i sin(2 πjθ i + ϕ i ) j =0 j =0 i =1 q − 1 m � � = w i (cos ϕ i · sin 2 πjθ i + sin ϕ i · cos 2 πjθ i ) i =1 j =0 = 0 .

  8. Which Numbers Occur as Density of the Positivity Set? • No positive dominating root: Numerical experiments usually yield approximations ≈ 1 / 2. • Theorem : For every κ ∈ ]0 , 1[, there is a C-finite sequence a n with no positive dominating root and density( { n ∈ ◆ : a n > 0 } ) = κ. • With positive dominating root: all numbers from [0 , 1] occur. • Theorem : r rational, 0 ≤ κ, r ≤ 1, κ + r ≤ 1. Then there is a C-finite sequence a n with density( { n ∈ ◆ : a n > 0 } ) = κ, density( { n ∈ ◆ : a n = 0 } ) = r. • r must be rational by the Skolem-Mahler-Lech the- orem (zero set is periodic).

  9. Conclusion • Inequalities are more difficult than identities • Still, many examples can be done by the method we presented • But even positivity of C-finite sequences is not known to be decidable • Diophantine methods reveal oscillating behaviour • Problem: Do we have √ 1 + sin(2 πθn ) + ( − 1 / 2) n > 0 , where θ = 2? (Remark: for almost all θ , this sequence is eventually positive.)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend