recovery of compactly supported functions from
play

Recovery of Compactly Supported Functions from Spectrogram - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Recovery of Compactly Supported Functions from Spectrogram Measurements via Lifting Mark Iwen markiwen @ math.msu.edu 2017 Friday, July 7 th , 2017 Joint work with... Sami Merhi (Michigan State University) M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase


  1. Recovery of Compactly Supported Functions from Spectrogram Measurements via Lifting Mark Iwen markiwen @ math.msu.edu 2017 Friday, July 7 th , 2017

  2. Joint work with... Sami Merhi (Michigan State University) M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 1 / 24

  3. Joint work with... Aditya Viswanathan (University of Michigan - Dearborn) M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 1 / 24

  4. Introduction Background Motivation Applications: The phase-retrieval problem arises whenever the detectors can only capture intensity measurements. For example, X-ray crystallography Diffraction imaging Ptychographic Imaging ... Our goals: Approaching realistic measurement designs compatible with, e.g., ptychography, coupled with computationally efficient and robust recovery algorithms. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 2 / 24

  5. Introduction Background Motivation Applications: The phase-retrieval problem arises whenever the detectors can only capture intensity measurements. For example, X-ray crystallography Diffraction imaging Ptychographic Imaging ... Our goals: Approaching realistic measurement designs compatible with, e.g., ptychography, coupled with computationally efficient and robust recovery algorithms. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 2 / 24

  6. Introduction Background Motivating Application Figure: Ptychographic Imaging M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 3 / 24

  7. Introduction Background Algorithms for Discrete Phase Retrieval There has been a good deal of work on signal recovery from phaseless STFT measurements in the discrete setting : ◮ First f and g are modeled as vectors ab initio, ◮ Then recovered from discrete STFT magnitude measurements. Recovery techniques include ◮ Iterative methods (Alt. Proj. for STFT) along the lines of Griffin and Lim [8, 12], ◮ Alternating Projections [7], ◮ Graph theoretic methods for Gabor frames based on polarization [11, 9], ◮ Semidefinite relaxation-based methods [5], and others [2, 1, 4, 3]. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 4 / 24

  8. Introduction Problem Statement and Specifications Signal Recovery from STFT Measurements In 1-D ptychography [10, 7], a compactly supported specimen f : R → C , is scanned by a focused beam g : R → C which translates across the specimen in fixed overlapping shifts l 1 ,...,l K ∈ R . At each such shift a phaseless diffraction image is sampled by a detector. The measurements are modeled as STFT magnitude measurements: � � � ∞ 2 � � � f ( t ) g ( t − l k ) e − 2 πiω j t dt � b k,j := , 1 ≤ k ≤ K, 1 ≤ j ≤ N. (1) � � −∞ We aim to approximate f (up to a global phase) using these b k,j measurements. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 5 / 24

  9. Introduction Problem Statement and Specifications Given stacked spectrogram samples from (1), � � T ∈ [0 , ∞ ) NK , � b = b 1 , 1 ,...,b 1 ,N ,b 2 , 1 ,...,b K,N (2) approximately recover a piecewise smooth and compactly supported function f : R → C up to a global phase. WLOG assume that the support of f is contained in [ − 1 , 1] . Motivated by ptychography, we primarily consider the beam function g to also be (effectively) compactly supported within [ − a,a ] � [ − 1 , 1] . Assume also that g is smooth enough that its Fourier transform decays relatively rapidly in frequency space compared to ˆ f . Examples of such g include both Gaussians, as well as compactly supported C ∞ bump functions [6]. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 6 / 24

  10. Signal Recovery Method The Proposed Numerical Approach Using techniques from [4, 3] on discrete PR adapted to continuous PR, recover samples of ˆ f at frequencies in Ω = { ω 1 ,...,ω N } , giving f ∈ C N with f j = � � f ( ω j ) : ◮ First, a truncated lifted linear system is inverted in order to learn a portion of the rank-one matrix � f � f ∗ . ◮ Then, angular synchronization is used to recover � f from the portion of f ∗ above. f � � Reconstruct � f via standard sampling theorems. Invert this approximation in order to learn f . This linear system is banded and Toeplitz, with band size determined by the decay of ˆ g : if g is effectively bandlimited to [ − δ,δ ] the � - essentially FFT-time in � δN (log N + δ 2 ) computational cost is O N for small δ . M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 7 / 24

  11. Signal Recovery Method Our Lifted Formulation Lifted Formulation Lemma (Lifting Lemma) Suppose f : R → C is piecewise smooth and compactly supported in [ − 1 , 1] . Let g ∈ L 2 ([ − a,a ]) be supported in [ − a,a ] ⊂ [ − 1 , 1] for some a < 1 , with � g � L 2 = 1 . Then for all ω ∈ R , � �� � � m � � m � � |F [ f · S l g ]( ω ) | = 1 � � e − πilm ˆ � � f g ˆ 2 − ω � � 2 2 � � m ∈ Z for all shifts l ∈ [ a − 1 , 1 − a ] . M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 8 / 24

  12. Signal Recovery Method Our Lifted Formulation Proof. Plancherel’s Theorem implies that � � � ∞ 2 � � |F [ f · S l g ]( ω ) | 2 = ˆ � g ( − η ) e − 2 πilη dη � f ( ω − η )ˆ . � � −∞ Applying Shannon’s Sampling theorem to ˆ f and recalling that F [ f ⋆g ] = ˆ f ˆ g yield � � 2 � � m �� � � � � � |F [ f · S l g ]( ω ) | 2 = g ( · ) e − 2 πil ( · ) ⋆ sinc π ( m +2( · )) ˆ � � f ˆ ( − ω ) � � 2 � � m ∈ Z � � 2 � � m � � � − l +1 � = 1 � � g ( u ) e − 2 πiu ( m 2 − ω ) du ˆ e − πil ( m − 2 ω ) � � f . � � 4 2 � � − l − 1 m ∈ Z The result follows by noting the support of g and the Fourier type integral in the last equality. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 9 / 24

  13. Signal Recovery Method Our Lifted Formulation Lifted Form We write our measurements in a lifted form |F [ f · S l g ]( ω ) | 2 ≈ 1 � l � Y ω � ω � X ∗ Y ∗ X l 4 X l ∈ C 4 δ +1 and � Y ω ∈ C 4 δ +1 are the vectors where �     ˆ f ( ω − δ ) e πil (2 δ ) ˆ g ( − δ )  � �  � �     ˆ ω − δ + 1 e πil (2 δ − 1) ˆ 1 f  2 − δ    g 2        .  . . .     . .         � e πil · 0 ˆ , � ˆ X l = g (0) Y ω = .    f ( ω )      . .     . .  .    . � �     � �     δ − 1 e πil (1 − 2 δ ) ˆ g ˆ ω + δ − 1     f 2   2 e πil ( − 2 δ ) ˆ g ( δ ) ˆ f ( ω + δ ) M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 10 / 24

  14. Signal Recovery Method Our Lifted Formulation Lifted Form We write our measurements in a lifted form |F [ f · S l g ]( ω ) | 2 ≈ 1 � l � Y ω � ω � X ∗ Y ∗ X l 4 Here, � Y ω � Y ∗ ω is the rank-one matrix  � �  2 � � � ˆ f ( ω − δ ) ˆ ˆ f ( ω − δ ) ˆ ˆ f ( ω − δ ) ··· f ( ω ) ··· f ( ω + δ ) �     . . . . ... . . . .   . . . .   � �   2 � �  f ( ω ) ˆ ˆ � ˆ f ( ω ) ˆ ˆ  f ( ω − δ ) ··· f ( ω ) ··· f ( ω + δ ) . �     . . . . ...   . . . .  . . . .   � �  2 � � f ( ω + δ ) ˆ ˆ f ( ω + δ ) ˆ ˆ � ˆ f ( ω − δ ) ··· f ( ω ) ··· f ( ω + δ ) � Note the occurrence of the magnitudes of ˆ f on the diagonal, and the relative phase terms elsewhere. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 11 / 24

  15. Signal Recovery Method Our Lifted Formulation Let F ∈ C N × N be defined as  � � ˆ � �  ˆ j − 2 n − 1 i − 2 n − 1 f f , if | i − j | ≤ 2 δ, , where n = N − 1 2 2 F i,j = .  4 0 , otherwise, F is composed of overlapping segments of matrices � Y ω � Y ∗ ω for ω ∈ {− n,...,n } . Thus, our spectrogram measurements can be written as � b ≈ diag ( GFG ∗ ) , (3) where G ∈ C NK × N is a block Toeplitz matrix encoding the � X l ’s. We consistently vectorize (3) to obtain a linear system which can be inverted to learn � F , a vectorized version of F . M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 12 / 24

  16. Signal Recovery Method Our Lifted Formulation In particular, we have � b ≈ M � F, (4) where M ∈ C NK × N 2 is computed by passing the canonical basis of C N × N through (3). We solve the linear system (4) as a least squares problem. Experiments have shown that M is of rank NK. The process of recovering the Fourier samples of f from � F is known as angular synchronization. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 13 / 24

  17. Signal Recovery Method Our Lifted Formulation Angular Synchronization Angular synchronization is the process recovering d angles φ 1 ,φ 2 ,...,φ d ∈ [0 , 2 π ) given noisy and possibly incomplete difference measurements of the form φ ij := φ i − φ j , ( i,j ) ∈ { 1 , 2 ,...,d }×{ 1 , 2 ,...,d } . We are interested in angular synchronization problems that arise when performing phase retrieval from local correlation measurements [4, 3]. M.A. Iwen (MSU) Continuous Phase Retrieval SampTA 2017 14 / 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend