REACTIVE BLENDING OF POLYETHYLENE AND POLY(L- LACTIC ACID) USING A - - PDF document

18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS

1 Introduction In recent years, environment-friendly polymers have gathering much attention more than ever because of the environmental and energy problems on a global

• scale. Poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) is the most

commercial environment-friendly polymer and some industrial plants for producing PLLA in large volume have been established. PLLA is derived from plants which are renewable resources and is

• biodegradable. Besides, on account of its carbon

neutrality, PLLA have a potential to resolve the current problems concerning the global warming. In spite of the environmental friendliness, its brittleness and low heat distortion temperature limit the application of neat PLLA. To overcome these weak points and employ PLLA in wider range of application, extensive works have been carried on PLLA blends with other polymers. Polymer blending is a general method to modify the property

• f polymers. However, in the case of an immiscible

blend, the property of the blend could get worse than that of the original components due to the poor morphology and poor interfacial adhesion between blend components. In such a case, a compatibilizer such as a graft or block copolymer has been used for the blend preparation. Previous works [1–14] reported that the morphology and mechanical performance of the immiscible PLLA blends could be improved by the use of a compatibilizer. These compatibilized PLLA blends scarify biodegradability owing to the addition of other polymers and compatibilizers into PLLA. Nevertheless, the blends might reduce the amount of CO2 emitted over the business life-cycle and thus still have an advantage for the environmental problem. Among polymers for practical use, low-density polyethylene (LDPE) can be a good opponent party

• f the PLLA blend since LDPE is the commercially

relevant and heavily-used polymers. The realization

• f the blend will provide us a new economical and

environment-friendly polymer material. Hillmyer et

• al. [9–11] prepared PLLA/LDPE blends with

polyethylene-poly (L-lactic acid) block copolymer as a compatibilizer. These authors demonstrated that the addition of the compatibilizer could improve the miscibility and mechanical properties of the blend. Subsequently, other works reported PLLA/LDPE blends with a compatibilizer such as ethylene glycidyl methacrylate (EGMA) [12], glycidyl methacrylate–grafted poly (ethylene-octene) copolymer [13], grafted low-density polyethylene maleic anhydride [14]. These works clearly exhibited that the use of a compatiblizer was essential to manufacture a practicable LDPE/PLLA

• blend. Complying with these results, we investigated

LDPE/PLLA blends with EGMA as a compatibilizer in the present work. For the fabrication, we employed the high-shear processing which has been established recently by ourselves. The high-shear extruder can reach a maximum rotation speed of 3000 rpm corresponding to a shear rate of about 4400 sec-1. Previous works proved that this is a powerful tool for decreasing the phase size significantly for the immiscible polymer blends [15– 17]. Accordingly, we can expect that the high-shear processing will further enhance the properties of the LDPE/PLLA blend. This work focuses on the blend with the weight ratio

• f LDPE/PLLA=75/25 as a representative of LDPE-

rich blends and is intended as the starting point of investigation of LDPE/PLLA blends in an entire mixing ratio. Our present aim is to estimate the influence of the shear condition on the morphology

• f the LDPE/PLLA blends and to examine how the

mechanical property of a flexible LDPE can be improved by the addition of PLLA. 2 Experimental

REACTIVE BLENDING OF POLYETHYLENE AND POLY(L- LACTIC ACID) USING A HIGH-SHEAR EXTRUDER

• Y. Yomogida1, H. Tsukada1, Y. Li2, H. Shimizu1*

1 Nanotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and

Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 5, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058565, Japan

2 College of Materials, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University,

Xiasha Hi-tech Zone, No.16 Xuelin Rd. Hangzhou 310036, China

* Corresponding author(shimizu-hiro@aist.go.jp)

Keywords: Poly(lactic acid), Polyethylene, Polymer blend, High-shear extrude

2.1 Blend preparation All samples used in this study was commercially

• available. The LDPE (MIRASON 50) was obtained

from Prime Polymer Co. Ltd. with melt-flow index = 1.9 g/10 min. The PLLA (TERRAMAC TP-4000) with the molecular weight of MW=170,000 was

• btained from UNITIKA. Co. Ltd.. The sample

included 1.2 % of D-lactic acid content. The reactive compatibilizer EGMA (Igeta bond fast 7L) with glycidyl methacrylate content 6 wt% was provided by Sumitomo chemical Co. Ltd. These samples were dried under vacuum at 80 oC for 24 h before use. The blends were prepared using a high shear extruder (NHSS2-28, NIIGATA MACHINE TECHNO Co. Ltd., Japan). Fig. 1 is the schematic diagram of the screw and the polymer melt flow

• route. This screw has a flow hole inside to expert a

simultaneous shear and an extensional flow during melt blending. The L/D ratio of the screw is 1.78. The LDPE/PLLA blends were prepared under the screw rotation speeds of 300, 600, and 900 rpm. The melt compounding was carried out at 200 oC for 1–8

• min. The temperature of the sample during mixing

was controlled with the variation of less than 10 oC using a water-cooling system. The weight ratio of LDPE/PLLA was fixed at 75/25. Concentration of EGMA is 5 wt% with respect to the whole weight fraction of LDPE/PLLA. After blending, the samples were hot-pressed at 200 oC to form a sheet

• f 1 mm thickness under the pressure of 10 MPa for

5 min, followed by quenching with circulating water. 2.2 Characterization Morphology of the blends was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A Philips XL-20 SEM was used for SEM observations at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The samples were fractured after immersion in liquid nitrogen for 10 min. The fracture surface was then coated with a thin layer of gold. TEM observations were carried

• ur using a JEM 1230 (JEOL Ltd.) at an acceleration

voltage of 120 kV. The blend samples were ultramicrotomed at –120 oC to a section with a thickness of about 70 nm. The sections were then stained with RuO4 for 20 min. Dynamical mechanical analysis (DMA) was carried

• ut with a Rheovibron DDV-25FP (Orientec Corp.)

in the tensile mode. All the measurements were performed in the linear region with the strain of 0.03 %. Dynamic loss (tan δ) was determined at 1 Hz and a heating rate of 3 oC/min as a function of temperature range from –150 oC to 170 oC. Tensile tests were carried out according to the JIS K7113 test method using dumb-bell-shaped samples punched out from the molded sheets. The tests were performed with Tensilon UMT-300 (Orientec Co. Ltd.) at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min at 20 oC and 50 % relative humidity. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Morphology of the LDPE/PLLA blends

• Fig. 2a shows the SEM image of the LDPE/PLLA

blend without a compatibilizer prepared at 300 rpm for 2min. PLLA forms domains dispersed in the LDPE matrix. The PLLA domain size ranges from 1 to 10 μm. The adhesion between the two phases is clearly weak. We also examined the morphologies

• f the blends at 600 and 900 rpm, which are not

given here for the sake of simplicity. It was found that there was no clear improvement at a higher screw rotation speed. Thus, the morphology was independent of the screw rotation speed for the blends without a compatibilizer.

• Fig. 2b shows the SEM image of the LDPE/PLLA

blend with EGMA content 5 wt% prepared at 300 rpm for 2 min. The image indicates that the addition

• f the compatibilizer dramatically reduce the

average size of the PLLA domain down to about 1.5 μm. Kim et al. [12] reported the PLLA/LDPE=20/80 blends with EGMA. They demonstrated that the epoxide groups of EGMA could react either with – COOH or with –OH of the PLLA end groups to form a grafting copolymer that could function as a

• compatibilizer. The presence of the conpatibilizer

could improve the morphology of the immiscible

• blend. However, the elongation at break of the

blends was quite low compared with LDPE. Subsequently, we performed SEM observations on the blends with EGMA prepared at 600 and 900 rpm for 2min, as demonstrated in Figs. 2c and 2d. The morphologies change dramatically compared with that of 300 rpm. As shown in Fig. 2b, the clear white PLLA domain in the LDPE matrix is observed for 300 rpm. In the case of 600 and 900 rpm, the relatively dark phase appears in the LDPE matrix

3 PAPER TITLE

and the interface between these phases is not well

• defined. The change in the appearance clearly

indicates that the high-shear processing improves the blend morphology. The average size of the dark phase for 600 rpm is less than 1 μm. Compared with 600 rpm, the blend prepared at 900 rpm shows a wider distribution of the dark domain size less than 4μm. As discussed above, the shear condition has an influence

• n

the morphology

• f

the LDPE/PLLA/EGMA blends when the mixing time is fixed at 2 min. We then examined the mixing time dependence on the morphology. Firstly, SEM

• bservations

were performed

• n

the LDPE/PLLA/EGMA blends prepared at 600 rpm for 1 and 4 min as shown in Figs. 3a and 3b,

• respectively. In the SEM image for 1 min, the white

PLLA domain is observed like the blend prepared at 300 rpm for 2 min (Fig. 2b), implying that the mixing time of 1 min at 600 rpm is insufficient to attain the improved morphology. Fig. 3b indicates that the blend morphology for 4 min is as almost same as that for 2 min (Fig. 2c) except for the slight increase of the average dark domain size. Secondary, as shown in Fig. 3c, the morphology of the blend at 900 rpm for 1 min was observed for the comparison with that for 2 min (Fig. 2d). The morphology for 1 min is seen to have a fine morphology as is the case for 2 min. Thus, the time required for the improvement of the morphology much depends on the screw rotation speed. In our study, we could

• btain the fine morphology for 1 min by the

application of 900 rpm. In order to reveal the mechanism of the change in the blend morphology depending on the screw rotation speed, we performed TEM observations on some blends. Fig. 4a shows the TEM image of the LDPE/PLLA/EGMA blend prepared at 300 rpm for 2 min. In the image, EGMA is observed as the dark particles in the PLLA phase because EGMA is more readily stained than PLLA by RuO4. EGMA forms small particles with the particle size less than 0.2 μm and dispersed discretely in the PLLA phase. This result indicates that EGMA has the higher affinity with PLLA rather than LDPE. Figs. 4b and 4c show the TEM image of the blends at 600 rpm for 4 min and at 900 rpm for 1 min, as representatives of the blends which have improved morphologies. In these cases, EGMA locates at the interface between LDPE and PLLA phases, leading to the good adhesion at the interface. These TEM observations clarify that the high-shear processing can form the grafted structure via EGMA between LDPE and PLLA

• phases. As a result, EGMA becomes to act as a

compatibilizer more effectively. 3.2 Mechanical properties of LDPE/PLLA blends Tensile stress-strain curves of LDPE and some blends are shown in Fig. 5. The main tensile properties such as tensile strength and elongation at break determined from these curves are presented in Table 1. LDPE is very flexible and shows a high value of elongation at break (> 750 %), but the tensile strength is low. The blends without EGMA show the high tensile strength, but breaks at the low elongation at break due to the poor morphology. The addition of EGMA improves tensile properties, yielding the increase of the elongation at break up to 96.7 % at 300 rpm. Furthermore, the blends prepared under the high-shear conditions of 600 and 900 rpm show a considerable increase in the elongation at break up to about 330 %. Compared with the blend under the low-shear condition of 300 rpm, the values

• f the tensile strength are also increased for 600 and

900 rpm. Table 1 also shows the values of storage modulus estimated from the DMA analysis. The storage modulus of the blends with EGMA is as almost same as that of the blends without EGMA. From the result of the mechanical measurements, it is found that LDPE/PLLA blends which have fine morphologies show the relative high modulus and high stiffness compared to LDPE, keeping a sufficient elongation character. 4 Conclusions The morphology of the LDPE /PLLA blends without EGMA has a bigger PLLA domain in the LDPE matrix and weak interface. Those blends exhibit poor mechanical properties. It is found that EGMA is an effective reactive compatibilizer for the LDPE/PLLA blend as indicated by the significant decrease of the PLLA domain size. Moreover, the application of the high-shear conditions positively affected the morphology of the blend system. The blends obtained by the combination of reactive blending and high-shear processing exhibited an excellent improvement in the mechanical properties.

In the present work, we succeeded in fabricating the environment-friendly LDPE/PLLA blends which have excellent mechanical properties. It is expected that LDPE can be derived from plants as well as PLLA in near future. Then, LDPE/PLLA blends will further contribute to the settlement

• f

the environmental and energy problems, especially the reduced dependence on petroleum resources. Fig.1. Full-automatic high-shear extruder and the schematic diagram for the screw used in the high- shear extruder and the flow route of polymer melt during mixing.

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Fig.2. SEM image of LDPE/PLLA=75/25 blend prepared at 600 rpm for 2min (a), and LDPE/PLLA/EGMA=75/25/5 blend prepared at 300 (b), 600 (c) and 900 rpm (d) for 2 min.

(a)

5 PAPER TITLE

(b) (c)

Fig.3. SEM image of LDPE/PLLA/EGMA=75/25/5 blend at 600 rpm for 1 min (a) and 4min (b), and at 900 rpm for 1 min (c).

(a)

0.2 μm

(b)

0.2 μm

(c)

0.2 μm

Fig.4. TEM image of LDPE/PLLA/EGMA=75/25/5 prepared at 300 (a) and 600 rpm (b) for 2 min, and at 900 rpm for 1 min (c). Fig.5. Tensile strain-stress curves for LDPE (a), LDPE/PLLA=75/25 blend prepared at 300 rpm for 2 min (b), and LDPE/PLLA/EGMA=75/25/5 blend blends at 300 (c), 600 (d), and 900 rpm (e) for 2 min.

Table 1. Mechanical properties of neat LDPE and LEPE/PLLA blends.

Samples Storage modulus (MPa) Tensile strength (MPa) Elongation at break (%) LDPE 314.3 9.2 771.6 LDPE/PLLA 300 rpm 442.3 12.8 43.1 LDPE/PLLA/EGMA 300 rpm 442.2 10.2 96.7 LDPE/PLLA/EGMA 600 rpm 445.5 11.5 327.5 LDPE/PLLA/EGMA 900 rpm 443.8 11.6 329.5

References

[1] L. Jiang, M. P. Wolcott, J. Zhang “Study of Biodegradable Polylactide/Poly(butylenes adipate-co- terephthalate) Blends”. Biomacromolecule, Vol. 7,

• No. 1, pp 199-207, 2006.

[2] M. Harada, T. Ohya, K. Iida, H. Hayashi, K. Hirano, H. Fukuda “Increased Impact Strength

• f

Biodegradable Poly(lactic acid)/Poly(butylenes succinate) Blend Composites by Using Isocyanate as a Reactive Processing Agent ”. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 106, Issue 3, pp 1813-1820, 2007. [3] Y. Li, H. Shimizu “Structural control of co- continuous poly(L-lactide) /poly(butylenes succinate) /clay nanocomposites”. European Polymer Journal,

• Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp 738-746, 2009.

[4] C. L. Jun “Reactive Blending of Biodegradable Polymers: PLA and Starch”. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp 33-37, 2000. [5] M. A. Huneault, H. Li “Morphology and properties

• f compatibilized polylactide/thermoplastic starch

blends”. Polymer, Vol. 48, Issue 1, pp 270-280, 2007. [6] J. Zhang, L. Jiang, L. Zhu, J. Jane, P. Mungara “Morphology and Properties Soy Protein and Polylactide of Blends”. Biomacromolecules, Vol. 7,

• No. 5, pp 1551-1561, 2006.

[7] B. Liu, L. Jiang, H. Liu, L. Sun, J. Zhang “Different Effects of Water and Glycerol on Morphology and properties

• f

Poly(lactic acid)/Soy Protein Concentrate Blends”. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, Vol. 295, Issue 2, pp 123-129, 2010. [8] T. Wook, H. G. Yoon, S. J. Choi, M. S. Kim, Y. H. Kim, W. N. Kim “Effects of Compatibilizers on the Mechanical Properties and Interfacial Tension of Polypropylene and Poly(lactic acid) Blends”. Macromolecular Research, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp 583- 588, 2010. [9] Y. Wang, M. A. Hillmyer “Effects of Compatibilizers

• n the Mechanical Properties and Interfacial Tension
• f Polypropylene and Poly(lactic acid) Blends”.

Journal of Polymer Science:Part A: Polymer Chemistry, Vol. 39, Issue 16, pp 2755-2766, 2001. [10] K. S. Anderson, S. H. Lim, M. A. Hillmyer “Toughening of Polylactide by Melt Blending with Linear Low-Density Polyethylene”. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 89, Issue 14, pp 3757- 3768, 2003. [11] S. A. Kelly, M. A. Hillmyer “The influence of block copolymer microstructure on the toughness of compatibilized polylactide/polyethylene blends”. Polymer, Vol. 45, Issue 26, pp 8809-8823, 2004. [12] Y. F. Kim, C. N. Choi, Y. D. Kim, K. Y. Lee, M. S. Lee “Compatibilization of Immiscible Poly(l-lactide) and Low Density Polyethylene Blends”. Fibers and Polymers, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp 270-274, 2004. [13] Z. Su, Q. Li, Y. Liu, H. Xu, W. Guo, C. Wu “Phase Structure of Compatibilized Poly(Lactid Acid)/Linear Low-Density Polyethylene Blends”. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B, Vol. 48, Issue 4, pp 823-833, 2009. [14] G. Singh, H. Bhunia, A. Rajor, R. N. Jana, V. Choudhary “Mechanical Properties and Morphology

• f Polylactide, Linear Low-Density Polyethylene,

and Their Blends”. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 118, Issue 1, pp 496-502, 2010. [15] Y. Li, H. Shimizu “Formation of Nanostructured PVDF/PA11 Blends Using High-Shear Processing”. Macromolecules, Vol. 38, Issue 19, pp 7880-7883, 2005. [16] Y. Li, H. Shimizu “Morphological investigations on the nanostructured poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polyamide 11 blends by high-shear processing”. European Polymer Journal, Vol. 42, Issue 12, pp 3202-3211, 2006. [17] Y. Li, H. Shimizu “Fabrication of nanostructured polycarbonate/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends with improved optical and mechanical properties by high- shear processing”. Polymer Engineering & Science, (to be published).