www.RazomForUkraine.org/donate 1 Introduction ion Maryna - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

razomforukraine org donate
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

www.RazomForUkraine.org/donate 1 Introduction ion Maryna - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

www.RazomForUkraine.org/donate 1 Introduction ion Maryna Prykhodko, Razom RazomForUkraine.org Prese sentations ns Kyrylo Loukerenko & Ira Solomko, hromadske.radio Artem Zakharchenko,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

www.RazomForUkraine.org/donate

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction ion

Maryna Prykhodko, Razom RazomForUkraine.org

Prese sentations ns

Kyrylo Loukerenko & Ira Solomko, Громадське Радіо hromadske.radio Artem Zakharchenko, Центр Контент Алалізу ukrcontent.com

Q Q & & A A

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

New York City, February 9, 2019

Ira Solomko Kyrylo Loukerenko

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ukra raine Pre residential El Electi tion Marc rch 31, 201 2019

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

?? ?? CANDI DIDA DATES ES

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

44 CA CANDIDATE TES

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ba Backgrou

  • round. Ukra

rain inia ian Med edia ia Tra Transition sition PRIVATE

(MOSTLY OLIGARCHIC)

MEDIA

PUBLIC MEDIA

19 1991 201 2019

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TOP 5 TV CHANNELS

UKRAYINA 16,70% share 1+1 9,70% share ICTV 7,30% share INTER 7,00% share STB 5,90% share

January 2019

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TV OLIGARCHY

22%

Victor PINCHUK

20%

Ihor KOLOMOYSKIY____

21%

Dmytro FIRTASH

13%

Rinat AKHMETOV______

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

RADIO OWNERS

40%

Victor Pinchuk

31%

Serhiy Kurchenko

12%

Anatioliy Yevtuhov

10%

Kateryna Kit-Sadova

5%

Tomas Fiala

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TOP 10 NEWS SITES

Site Real users Coverage

  • bozrevatel.com

6 508 703 27,59% segodnya.ua 4 663 728 19,77% tsn.ua 4 658 713 19,75% 24tv.ua 4 570 556 19,37% RBC_ROS 4 160 215 17,63% unian.net 2 807 736 11,90% nv.ua 2 480 772 10,52% ictv.ua 1 681 505 7,13% fakty.ictv.ua 1 493 904 6,33% bigmir.net 1 443 761 6,12% Site Coverage

  • bozrevatel.com

19% 24tv.ua 18% segodnya.ua 17% tsn.ua 15% rbc.ua 13% unian (.net/.info/.ua) 12% politeka.net 12% znaj.ua 11% korrespondent.net 9% strana.ua 9%

Source: Ukrainian Internet Association Source: Gemius

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Petro POROSHENKO

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Yulia TYMOSHENKO

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Volodymyr ZELENSKY

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Oleh LYASHKO

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Andriy SADOVYI

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Vadym RABYNOVYCH

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Yevhen MURAYEV

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Anatoliy HRYTSENKO

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SO SOME E OTHER THER SO SOURCES ES OF IN INFORMATIO TION

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

twitter.com/K_Loukerenko facebook.com/kyrylo.loukerenko hromadske.radio

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

UA UA:PB PBC.

  • C. Pu

Public c Service ce Broad roadcas aster er

Zurab ALASANIA UA:PBC Head of the Board

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

МЕДІА- ПОРТРЕТ

Media coverage of topics uncomfortable to Petro Poroshenko

Electoral zrado-metric

Media environment

slide-25
SLIDE 25

МЕДІА- ПОРТРЕТ 2

RESEARCH DESIGN

SAMPLE

12 top national TV channels and 11

  • nline media:

1+1, 2+2, UA:Pershyi, STB, 24 channel, 5 channel, ICTV, NewsOne, ZIK, Inter, Pryamyi, Ukraine channel. Censor.net, Ukraiinska Pravda, TSN, Strana, Segodnya.ua, Radio Svoboda, Novoe Vremya, Liga, Korrespondent, Delo, 24 channel

TOPICS

10 topics which became communication crises for President: President`s Maldives vacations, lobbying military boats of “Kuznya”, Onyshchenko`s recordings, accident involving the Poroshenko`s cortege, bargains with Kernes, affilation with Semochko, affilation to Gandziuk murder, abuse with the President`s Fund, meetings with Medvedchuk, presence of so called crime lord “Narik” on the Tomos signature ceremony.

CODING

  • Level of coverage or suppression of

topics listed above;

  • Sentiment of coverage
  • Publications framing

Media environment

slide-26
SLIDE 26

МЕДІА- ПОРТРЕТ 3

PREVALENCE OF FRAMING TYPES IN TOP UKRAINIAN MEDIA

Framing`s sentiment distribution

429 57% 142 19% 177 24% Negative Neutral Positive 5 17 25 41 49 54 55 97 142 263

Emphasising Poroshenko`s unprofessionalism Emphasising Poroshenko`s political liability Emphasising Poroshenko`s work results Dramatising, hyperbola, humiliation Financial framing (negative) Emphasising Poroshenko`s immorality Poroshenko`s exculpation, non-involvement in abuses Emphasising indecency of Poroshenko`s contradictors Plain fact providing Emphasising Poroshenko`s involvement to corruption, crime

The most popular framing patterns in media

Number of publications about topics, uncomfortable to P.Poroshenko

Media environment

slide-27
SLIDE 27

МЕДІА- ПОРТРЕТ 4

STANCE OF TOP MEDIA

Media environment

100%

67%

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9

  • 10%
  • 20%
  • 30%
  • 40%
  • 50%
  • 60%
  • 70%
  • 80%
  • 90%
  • 100%

The most widely used publications framing

1+1 2+2

Sentiment rate

Work result Exculpation Disadvantage of

  • pponents

Corruption, crime Immorality Finance (criticism)

20

Name of the media Sentiment rate: prevalence of positive sentiment over negative sentiment relative to overall publication number Plain fact No pronounced emphasis

  • 18%

TSN

3%

ZIK

9%

Delo

  • 40%

Liga

  • 25%

8

Novoe vremya

  • 25%

24 channel (online)

  • 37%Strana
  • 46%

24 channel (TV) Radio Svoboda Censor.net

  • 12%
  • 18%

Ukraiinska Pravda UA:Pershyi

  • 100%

0%

NewsONE

0%

Korrespondent

0%

Segodnya.ua

53%

ICTV

50%

Inter STB 100%

100%

Pryamyi channel Ukraine channel

83 83% % 5 channel 10% 83%

  • 37%
  • 49%

Number of negative topics coverage

  • 45%

83%

slide-28
SLIDE 28

МЕДІА- ПОРТРЕТ 5

KEY CONCLUSIONS

NEGATIVE VS SUPPRESSION

We see prevalence of negative coverage in these topics. Media loyal to Poroshenko prefer to keep silent about such topics rather then propagate his exculpations.

TWO DIFFERENT NEGATIVE PROVIDERS

Two media were the most active in the negative messages dissemination. Pro- Russian ‘Strana’ and Lviv mayor Sadovyi`s ‘24 channel’. They use very different framings. ‘Strana’ and ‘Radio Svoboda’ were two main topic-starters

  • f ‘zrada’.

ONLINE MEDIA IS MUCH MORE CRITICAL THAN TV

Only three TV channels afford to be critical to Poroshenko in some topics. In return, most of online media were more

  • r less critical including niche websites.

The most popular framing was related to corruption and crime unlike former president Yanukovych who was criticized for unprofessionalism and finance abuse.

Media environment

UA:PERSHYI`S DISLOYALITY

Recent scandal regarding to Ukrainian public channel become more understandable when we see it`s coverage of ‘zrada’ topics. It`s dramatically biased against the President.

PATRIOTIC POSITION OF ‘QUALITATIVE’ MEDIA

Media focused on smart audience usually provide balanced coverage of these topics, a bit more critical than lauditive. They ignore only issues harmful to national security.

SILENCE OF OLIGARHS

Media belonged to leading Ukrainian

  • ligarchs (Akhmetov, Firtash, Pinchuk,

even particularly Kolomoyskiy) are very loyal to Poroshenko. NewsOne channel, controlled by Putin`s companion Medvedchuk, also used particularly loyal framing.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Q & A

Maryna Prykhodko, Razom RazomForUkraine.org Kyrylo Loukerenko & Ira Solomko, Громадське Радіо hromadske.radio Artem Zakharchenko, Центр Контент Аналізу ukrcontent.com

slide-30
SLIDE 30

24

www.RazomForUkraine.org/donate