rapid restoration diagnostic look ba k back t to look a
play

Rapid Restoration Diagnostic Look ba k back t to look a ahea ead - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rapid Restoration Diagnostic Look ba k back t to look a ahea ead Case s stud udies Sout outh K Kor orea Bef Before 1960 1960 Impact ct Forest cover increased from 35% to 64% of country (1952-2007) Forest density


  1. “Rapid Restoration Diagnostic”

  2. Look ba k back t to look a ahea ead

  3. Case s stud udies

  4. Sout outh K Kor orea Bef Before 1960 1960 Impact ct • Forest cover increased from 35% to 64% of country (1952-2007) • Forest density increased 14x, population grew 2x, and economy grew 300x (1953-2007) Motiv ivate • Land slides, flooding, wood shortages • President Chung-hee made reforestation a national Afte fter 2000 2000 priority Enabl ble • Big tree planting campaigns • ↓ demand for fuel wood (90% of energy in 1950, 5% by 1980) Implem ement • Urbanization • Strong coordination between government levels • Series of 10-year reforestation plans (1973-now) with targets, funds, extension, public outreach, and enforcement

  5. NI NIGER ( (ZI ZIND NDER ER P PRO ROVINCE) Before: Pre-1990s After: Today Impact ct 5 million hectares restored into agroforestry • Improved food security for 2.5 million people • Motiv ivate Drought (1969-73) and famine (1984, 1988) • Enabl ble Rural Code reformed to promise farmers “rights to • benefits from trees” (1993) Implem ement Regeneration “know how” spread by farmer to farmer • 5

  6. Respons Re ns Theme me Fea eature Key ey success f factor e • Restoration generates economic benefits Benefits • Restoration generates social benefits • Restoration generates environmental benefits • Benefits of restoration are publicly communicated Moti tivate te Awareness • Opportunities for restoration are identified Crisis events • Crisis events are leveraged • Law requiring restoration exists Legal requirements • Law requiring restoration is broadly understood and enforced • Soil, water, climate, and fire conditions are suitable for restoration Ecological conditions • Plants and animals that can impede restoration are absent • Native seeds, seedlings, or source populations are readily available • Competing demands (e.g., food, fuel) for degraded forestlands Market conditions are declining • Value chains for products from restored area exists Enabl ble • Land and natural resource tenure are secure • Policies affecting restoration are aligned and streamlined Policy conditions • Restrictions on clearing remaining natural forests exist • Forest clearing restrictions are enforced • Local people are empowered to make decisions about restoration Social conditions • Local people are able to benefit from restoration • Roles and responsibilities for restoration are clearly defined Institutional conditions • Effective institutional coordination is in place • National and/or local restoration champions exist Leadership • Sustained political commitment exists • Restoration “know how” relevant to candidate landscapes exists Knowledge • Restoration “know how” transferred via peers or extension services Technical design • Restoration design is technically grounded and climate resilient Imple plement • Positive incentives and funds for restoration outweigh negative

  7. CAVE VEATS TS • Factors are inter-related • Not every case example has everything • The more factors in place, the greater likelihood of success

  8. Rapid Res estor oration on Diagnos ostic: 3 3 St Steps 1. 1. Sele lect the s sco cope. . Choose the “scope” or boundary within which to apply the Diagnostic. The selected scope will be the “candidate landscape.” 2. 2. Assess s statu tus o of key success f facto tors. Systematically evaluate whether or not key success factors for forest landscape restoration are in place for the candidate landscape. 3. 3. Identif tify strate tegie ies t to address m missin ing f facto tors. Identify strategies to close gaps in those key success factors that are currently not in place or only partly in place in the candidate landscape.

  9. 1. Sel Selec ect the e scope • What geographical space? – Landscape (country, region, watershed, etc.) • What time period? – Many decades • What goals? – Food, biodiversity, timber, erosion, water, etc

  10. 2. 2. A Asses ess k key ey suc uccess f facto tors rs

  11. 3. I Identify y strategi gies t to address missi sing f factor ors

  12. ++ Urgent Urgent Not easy Easy Urgency Not urgent Not urgent Not easy Easy - - Ease of implementation ++ - -

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend