Randy Foutch Chairman & CEO Forward-Looking / Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

randy foutch chairman ceo forward looking cautionary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Randy Foutch Chairman & CEO Forward-Looking / Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Randy Foutch Chairman & CEO Forward-Looking / Cautionary Statements This presentation and all oral statements made in connection herewith contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Randy Foutch Chairman & CEO

slide-2
SLIDE 2

This presentation and all oral statements made in connection herewith contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this presentation that address activities, events or developments that Laredo Petroleum, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”, “Laredo” or “LPI”) assumes, plans, expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “estimates,” “will,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “project,” “intend,” “indicator,” “foresee,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “goal,” “target,” “suggest” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature and are not guarantees of future performance. However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not forward-looking. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this presentation specifically include the expectations of plans, strategies, objectives and anticipated financial and operating results of the Company, including the Company’s drilling program, production, hedging activities, capital expenditure levels and other guidance included in this presentation. These statements are based on certain assumptions made by the Company based on management’s expectations and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and rate of return and other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. These include risks relating to financial performance and results, current economic conditions and resulting capital restraints, prices and demand for oil and natural gas and the related impact to financial statements as a result of asset impairments and revisions to reserve estimates, availability and cost of drilling equipment and personnel, availability of sufficient capital to execute the Company’s business plan, impact of compliance with legislation and regulations, successful results from the Company’s identified drilling locations, the Company’s ability to replace reserves and efficiently develop and exploit its current reserves and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and other reports filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and the Company undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward- looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. The SEC generally permits oil and natural gas companies to disclose proved reserves in filings made with the SEC, which are reserve estimates that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions and certain probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions for such terms. In this presentation, the Company may use the terms “unproved reserves,” “resource potential,” “estimated ultimate recovery,” “EUR,” “development ready,” “horizontal productivity confirmed,” “horizontal productivity not confirmed” or other descriptions

  • f potential reserves or volumes of reserves which the SEC guidelines restrict from being included in filings with the SEC without strict compliance with SEC definitions.

“Unproved reserves” refers to the Company’s internal estimates of hydrocarbon quantities that may be potentially discovered through exploratory drilling or recovered with additional drilling or recovery techniques. “Resource potential” is used by the Company to refer to the estimated quantities of hydrocarbons that may be added to proved reserves, largely from a specified resource play potentially supporting numerous drilling locations. A “resource play” is a term used by the Company to describe an accumulation of hydrocarbons known to exist over a large areal expanse and/or thick vertical section potentially supporting numerous drilling locations, which, when compared to a conventional play, typically has a lower geological and/or commercial development risk. The Company does not choose to include unproved reserve estimates in its filings with the SEC. “Estimated ultimate recovery”, or “EUR”, refers to the Company’s internal estimates of per-well hydrocarbon quantities that may be potentially recovered from a hypothetical and/or actual well completed in the area. Actual quantities that may be ultimately recovered from the Company’s interests are

  • unknown. Factors affecting ultimate recovery include the scope of the Company’s ongoing drilling program, which will be directly affected by the availability of capital,

drilling and production costs, availability and cost of drilling services and equipment, lease expirations, transportation constraints, regulatory approvals and other factors, as well as actual drilling results, including geological and mechanical factors affecting recovery rates. Estimates of ultimate recovery from reserves may change significantly as development of the Company’s core assets provide additional data. In addition, the Company’s production forecasts and expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and the undertaking and outcome of future drilling activity, which may be affected by significant commodity price declines or drilling cost increases.

2

Forward-Looking / Cautionary Statements

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WTI Price ($/Bbl)

  • Each member of senior management team has more than 30 years of

energy industry experience operating through a range of oil price environments

$0 $40 $80 $120

Jan-1986 Dec-1986 Nov-1987 Oct-1988 Sep-1989 Aug-1990 Jul-1991 Jun-1992 May-1993 Apr-1994 Mar-1995 Feb-1996 Jan-1997 Dec-1997 Nov-1998 Oct-1999 Sep-2000 Aug-2001 Jul-2002 Jun-2003 May-2004 Apr-2005 Mar-2006 Feb-2007 Jan-2008 Dec-2008 Nov-2009 Oct-2010 Sep-2011 Aug-2012 Jul-2013 Jun-2014 May-2015 Apr-2016

Colt Resources Lariat Petroleum Latigo Petroleum Laredo Petroleum

Historical Oil Price and Company Timeline

Always be Prepared for Low Prices

3

“Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked” – Warren Buffett

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Success Requires Long-Term Planning

4

Laredo has always taken a proactive stance towards reducing risk throughout the company

  • Build a contiguous acreage position and have a plan to hold

the acreage by production

  • Collect data early and utilize it to improve well performance
  • Drive operational excellence through best practices and high-

grading equipment

  • Invest in infrastructure to control costs and preserve
  • ptionality
  • Maintain liquidity and balance sheet flexibility
slide-5
SLIDE 5

2008 2010 2016

EXPLORATION DELINEATION DEVELOPMENT

Glasscock Reagan Irion Howard Sterling Glasscock Irion Howard Sterling

>80% of acreage is held by production

5

~15,000 Net Acres ~50,000 Net Acres ~128,000 Net Acres1

Reagan

LPI leasehold Buy outline

Reagan

1 As of 9/01/16, representative of Company’s Garden City acreage only

Build a Contiguous Acreage Position

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Collect, Analyze & Utilize Data

LPI leasehold Combined 3D Earth Model area LPI dipole sonic wells LPI sidewall and whole core wells

Develop & improve technical data sets Multivariate statistical calibration Create 3D production attribute Perform lookback analysis Highgrade EUR and NPV targets Plan new wells and execute operations Earth Model Completions Optimization

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Continual feedback refines the Earth Model to further improve well results

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3D Production Attribute 7 Simplified Dipole Log Display Earth Model Recreated Log

Earth Model coupled with optimized completions is driving production >30% above type-curve

3D Production Attribute

Landing Point 1 Landing Point 2

1 Cumulative oil production plot excludes downtime

Better Data, Better Results

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 20 30 40 50 10 20 30

Average Wells Improve through Best Composite Well Practice

Average Cline Best Composite

2013

45.5 days 32 days 32 days 24 days 24 days 15 days

+900’ MD

Days Days Days

Depth (feet)

30% Reduction

2014 2015

25% Reduction

Improve Every Step of the Drilling Process

Short-term service contracts enable the continuous high-grading

  • f drilling rigs to take advantage of the latest technology
slide-9
SLIDE 9

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 1Q-15 2Q-15 3Q-15 4Q-15 1Q-16 2Q-16 Average Drilled Lateral Length (Ft) 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1Q-15 2Q-15 3Q-15 4Q-15 1Q-16 2Q-16 Average Feet Drilled Rig Accept to Rig Release (Ft/Day) Total Drilling Efficiency $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 1Q-15 2Q-15 3Q-15 4Q-15 1Q-16 2Q-16 Average Completions Cost per Foot ($/Ft) Completions Cost per Foot Drilled Lateral Length $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 1Q-15 2Q-15 3Q-15 4Q-15 1Q-16 2Q-16 D&C Cost per Completed Foot ($/Ft) Total D&C Cost per Foot

Increased Efficiencies Lower Costs

9

Best Practices Enable Operational Excellence

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Cost Control via Infrastructure Investments

LMS Infrastructure serves >775 LPI wells and is expected to supply ~$26.5 MM total benefits for FY-161

1 Benefits defined as capital savings, LOE savings, price uplift and LMS net operating income

10

LMS Service LPI Financial Benefits Crude Gathering Increased revenues & 3rd-party income Centralized Gas Lift LOE savings Frac Water (Recycled vs Fresh) Capital savings Produced Water (Recycled vs Disposed) Capital & LOE savings Produced Water (Gathered vs Trucked) Capital & LOE savings

Natural gas lines Crude oil gathering lines Water lines LPI leasehold Corridor benefits (existing) Corridor benefits (planned)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1 Peers are CPE, CXO, EGN, FANG, PE, PXD, RSPP. Two-stream reporters were converted to three-stream utilizing an 18% volume uplift

$0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 $11 $12

LOE ($/BOE) 2Q-16

$0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 $11 $12

LOE ($/BOE) 2Q-15

LPI Peer

Peer Average: $8.15/BOE 11

Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer LPI Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer

Peer Average: $5.79/BOE

$4.43 Per BOE $6.90 Per BOE

Production corridor assets reduced unit LOE ~$0.72/BOE in 2Q-16

Drives Top-Tier Unit Operating Costs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Hedges Protect Anticipated Cash Flow

$25 $35 $45 $55 $65 $75 $85 $95 $105

WTI ($/Bbl) 2015 2016 2014

  • Reduce variability in anticipated cash flow due to commodity price

fluctuations

  • Utilize puts, swaps and collars
  • No put spreads or three-way collars that reduced the effectiveness of the

hedging program if prices fall significantly

‘15 LPI Hedge Floor: ~$81/Bbl ‘16 LPI Hedge Floor: ~$68/Bbl

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Short-Term Contracts Enable Capital Flexibility

Short-term service contracts enabled the Company to rapidly adjust to falling oil prices

$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 WTI Price ($/Bbl) LPI Horizontal Rig Count

Laredo's Flexible Rig Count vs. WTI

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Manage Debt to Protect Liquidity

$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Debt ($ MM)

2Q-16 Debt Maturity Summary

7.375% 5.625% 6.250%

$70 MM Revolver (drawn) $1.3 B Senior unsecured notes $815 MM Borrowing Base $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Debt ($ MM)

2Q-14 Debt Maturity Summary

7.375% 5.625% 9.500%

$0 MM Revolver (drawn) $1.5 B Senior unsecured notes $825 MM Borrowing Base

2Q-14 Net Debt ($ MM) $1,101 EBITDA ($ MM) $118 Net Debt/EBITDA 2.3 2Q-16 Net Debt ($ MM) $1,355 EBITDA ($ MM) $108 Net Debt/EBITDA 3.2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1 Production numbers prior to 2014 have been converted to 3-stream using an 18% uplift. 2014 results have been converted to 3-stream using actual

gas plant economics

2 2011 - 2013 adjusted for Granite Wash divestiture, closed August 1, 2013

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FY-16E Production1,2 (MBOE)

15

Expected production growth of ~27% during two years of commodity price weakness

Actual Estimate

Value Creation Throughout Commodity Downcycle

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Creating Consistent Value for All Stakeholders

16

  • Experienced Senior Management Team has successfully operated

through multiple commodity cycles

  • Contiguous Permian Basin acreage position enables infrastructure

investments, driving efficient operations throughout the

  • rganization
  • Data collection, analysis and utilization improves well

performance and drives efficiencies through best practices

  • Top-tier, multi-year hedge position and no term-debt maturities

until 2022