random generation in finite groups
play

RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS Mariapia Moscatiello University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS Mariapia Moscatiello University of Padova Young Researchers Algebra Conference 2019 Napoli 16th-18th September 2019 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS INTRODUCTION finite group


  1. RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS Mariapia Moscatiello University of Padova Young Researchers Algebra Conference 2019 Napoli 16th-18th September 2019 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  2. INTRODUCTION finite group ⋅ G M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  3. INTRODUCTION finite group ⋅ G ⋅ ( x k ) k ∈ℕ sequence of uniformly distributed - valued random variables G M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  4. INTRODUCTION finite group ⋅ G ⋅ ( x k ) k ∈ℕ sequence of uniformly distributed - valued random variables G Define a random variable: τ G = min { k ≥ 1 | ⟨ x 1 , …, x k ⟩ = G } M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  5. INTRODUCTION finite group ⋅ G ⋅ ( x k ) k ∈ℕ sequence of uniformly distributed - valued random variables G Define a random variable: τ G = min { k ≥ 1 | ⟨ x 1 , …, x k ⟩ = G } e ( G ) = ∑ kP ( τ G = k ) Expectation of τ G k ≥ 0 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  6. INTRODUCTION finite group ⋅ G ⋅ ( x k ) k ∈ℕ sequence of uniformly distributed - valued random variables G Define a random variable: τ G = min { k ≥ 1 | ⟨ x 1 , …, x k ⟩ = G } The expected number of e ( G ) = ∑ elements of G which have to be kP ( τ G = k ) drawn at random, with k ≥ 0 replacement, before a set of generators is found M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  7. INTRODUCTION we get τ G > k ⟺ ⟨ x 1 , …, x k ⟩ ≠ G Since P ( τ G > k ) = 1 − P G ( k ), the probability that k P G ( k ) = | {( g 1 , …, g k ) : ⟨ g 1 , …, g k ⟩ = G } | with randomly chosen | G | k elements generate G M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  8. INTRODUCTION we get τ G > k ⟺ ⟨ x 1 , …, x k ⟩ ≠ G Since P ( τ G > k ) = 1 − P G ( k ), the probability that k P G ( k ) = | {( g 1 , …, g k ) : ⟨ g 1 , …, g k ⟩ = G } | with randomly chosen | G | k elements generate G = ∑ kP ( τ G = k ) = ∑ P ( τ G = m ) ∑ e ( G ) k ≥ 1 k ≥ 1 m ≥ k = ∑ P ( τ G ≥ k ) = ∑ P ( τ G > k ) k ≥ 1 k ≥ 0 ( 1 − P G ( k ) ) ∑ = k ≥ 0 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  9. EXAMPLE is a cyclic group of prime order p , then If G = C p is a geometric random τ G p variable of parameter p − 1 , so e ( C p ) = p − 1 p M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  10. EXAMPLE Let G = D 2 p be the dihedral group of order 2p for an odd prime p G = ⟨ x 1 , …, x n ⟩ ⟺ ∃ 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n : x i ≠ 1 and x j ∉ ⟨ x i ⟩ M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  11. EXAMPLE Let G = D 2 p be the dihedral group of order 2p for an odd prime p G = ⟨ x 1 , …, x n ⟩ ⟺ ∃ 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n : x i ≠ 1 and x j ∉ ⟨ x i ⟩ The number of trials needed to obtain x in G is a geometric random variable ≠ 1 2 p 2 p − 1 with parameter and expectation E 0 = 2 p − 1 ; 2 p M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  12. EXAMPLE Let G = D 2 p be the dihedral group of order 2p for an odd prime p G = ⟨ x 1 , …, x n ⟩ ⟺ ∃ 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n : x i ≠ 1 and x j ∉ ⟨ x i ⟩ The number of trials needed to obtain x in G is a geometric random variable ≠ 1 2 p 2 p − 1 with parameter and expectation E 0 = 2 p − 1 ; 2 p p x has order the number of trials needed to With probability p 1 = 2 p − 1, 2 : 2 p find is a geometric with expectation y ∉ ⟨ x ⟩ E 1 = 2 p − 2 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  13. EXAMPLE Let G = D 2 p be the dihedral group of order 2p for an odd prime p G = ⟨ x 1 , …, x n ⟩ ⟺ ∃ 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n : x i ≠ 1 and x j ∉ ⟨ x i ⟩ The number of trials needed to obtain x in G is a geometric random variable ≠ 1 2 p 2 p − 1 with parameter and expectation E 0 = 2 p − 1 ; 2 p p x has order the number of trials needed to With probability p 1 = 2 p − 1, 2 : 2 p find is a geometric with expectation y ∉ ⟨ x ⟩ E 1 = 2 p − 2 p 2 = p − 1 x has order the number of trials needed to p : With probability 2 p − 1, 2 p is a geometric with expectation find y ∉ ⟨ x ⟩ E 2 = 2 p − p M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  14. EXAMPLE Let G = D 2 p be the dihedral group of order 2p for an odd prime p G = ⟨ x 1 , …, x n ⟩ ⟺ ∃ 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n : x i ≠ 1 and x j ∉ ⟨ x i ⟩ The number of trials needed to obtain x in G is a geometric random variable ≠ 1 2 p 2 p − 1 with parameter and expectation E 0 = 2 p − 1 ; 2 p p x has order the number of trials needed to With probability p 1 = 2 p − 1, 2 : 2 p find is a geometric with expectation y ∉ ⟨ x ⟩ E 1 = 2 p − 2 p 2 = p − 1 x has order the number of trials needed to p : With probability 2 p − 1, 2 p is a geometric with expectation find y ∉ ⟨ x ⟩ E 2 = 2 p − p 2 p 2 e ( D 2 p ) = E 0 + p 1 E 1 + p 2 E 2 = 2 + (2 p − 1)(2 p − 2) M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  15. EXAMPLE Let G = D 2 p be the dihedral group of order 2p for an odd prime p G = ⟨ x 1 , …, x n ⟩ ⟺ ∃ 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n : x i ≠ 1 and x j ∉ ⟨ x i ⟩ The number of trials needed to obtain x in G is a geometric random variable ≠ 1 2 p 2 p − 1 with parameter and expectation E 0 = 2 p − 1 ; 2 p p x has order the number of trials needed to With probability p 1 = 2 p − 1, 2 : 2 p find is a geometric with expectation y ∉ ⟨ x ⟩ E 1 = 2 p − 2 p 2 = p − 1 x has order the number of trials needed to p : With probability 2 p − 1, 2 p is a geometric with expectation find y ∉ ⟨ x ⟩ E 2 = 2 p − p 2 p 2 e ( D 2 p ) = E 0 + p 1 E 1 + p 2 E 2 = 2 + (2 p − 1)(2 p − 2) In particular e ( Sym (3)) = 29 10 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  16. MÖBIUS FUNCTION The Möbius function on the subgroup lattice of G is defined as: μ G μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ ∀ H < G μ G ( K ), H < K M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  17. MÖBIUS FUNCTION The Möbius function on the subgroup lattice of G is defined as: μ G μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ ∀ H < G μ G ( K ), H < K Theorem (P . Hall) P G ( t ) = ∑ μ G ( H ) | G : H | t H ≤ G M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  18. MÖBIUS FUNCTION The Möbius function on the subgroup lattice of G is defined as: μ G μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ ∀ H < G μ G ( K ), H < K Theorem (P . Hall) P G ( t ) = ∑ μ G ( H ) | G : H | t H ≤ G Theorem (A. Lucchini) e ( G ) = − ∑ μ G ( H ) | G | | G | − | H | H < G M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  19. EXAMPLE μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ μ G ( K ), ∀ H < G Sym (3) H < K ⟨ (123) ⟩ ⟨ (12) ⟩ ⟨ (13) ⟩ ⟨ (23) ⟩ {1} M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  20. EXAMPLE μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ μ G ( K ), ∀ H < G Sym (3) 1 H < K ⟨ (123) ⟩ ⟨ (12) ⟩ ⟨ (13) ⟩ ⟨ (23) ⟩ {1} M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  21. EXAMPLE μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ μ G ( K ), ∀ H < G Sym (3) 1 H < K ⟨ (123) ⟩ − 1 ⟨ (12) ⟩ ⟨ (13) ⟩ ⟨ (23) ⟩ − 1 − 1 − 1 {1} M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  22. EXAMPLE μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ μ G ( K ), ∀ H < G Sym (3) 1 H < K ⟨ (123) ⟩ − 1 ⟨ (12) ⟩ ⟨ (13) ⟩ ⟨ (23) ⟩ − 1 − 1 − 1 {1} 3 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  23. EXAMPLE μ G ( G ) = 1 μ G ( H ) = − ∑ μ G ( K ), ∀ H < G Sym (3) 1 H < K ⟨ (123) ⟩ − 1 ⟨ (12) ⟩ ⟨ (13) ⟩ ⟨ (23) ⟩ − 1 − 1 − 1 {1} 3 μ Sym (3) ( H ) | Sym (3) | ∑ e ( Sym (3)) = − | Sym (3) | − | H | H < Sym (3) 6 − 3 = 29 = − 3 ⋅ 6 6 6 6 − 1 + 3 ⋅ 6 − 2 + 10 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  24. WHAT IS KNOWN Dixon proved that e ( Sym ( n )) → 2.5 and e ( Alt ( n )) → 2, n → ∞ M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  25. WHAT IS KNOWN Dixon proved that e ( Sym ( n )) → 2.5 and e ( Alt ( n )) → 2, n → ∞ More generally for a finite, non abelian, simple group S , famous results of Dixon, Kantor-Lubotzky and Liebeck-Shalev establish that P S (2) → 1, | S | → ∞ From this one can deduce that e ( S ) → 2, | S | → ∞ M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

  26. WHAT IS KNOWN Dixon proved that e ( Sym ( n )) → 2.5 and e ( Alt ( n )) → 2, n → ∞ More generally for a finite, non abelian, simple group S , famous results of Dixon, Kantor-Lubotzky and Liebeck-Shalev establish that P S (2) → 1, | S | → ∞ From this one can deduce that e ( S ) → 2, | S | → ∞ Lucchini proved that for a non abelian, simple group S , e ( S ) ≤ e ( Alt (6)) ∼ 2.494 and that for n ≥ 5, 2.5 ≤ e ( Sym ( n )) ≤ e ( Sym (6)) ∼ 2.8816 M ARIAPIA M OSCATIELLO RANDOM GENERATION IN FINITE GROUPS

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend