RAND Proposed QSLA Developmental Evaluation Plan December 2018 27 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rand proposed qsla developmental evaluation plan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RAND Proposed QSLA Developmental Evaluation Plan December 2018 27 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RAND Proposed QSLA Developmental Evaluation Plan December 2018 27 QSLA currently in test phase 2 for select components Test Refine QSLA model based on Learn Phase Phase 1 Evaluate implementation and functioning of Test select


slide-1
SLIDE 1

27

RAND Proposed QSLA Developmental Evaluation Plan

December 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

28

QSLA currently in test phase 2 for select components

Test Phase 1

  • Refine QSLA model based on Learn Phase

Test Phase 2

  • Evaluate implementation and functioning of

select components to inform Scale Phase

  • Assessment technical assistance
  • Tier ratings
  • Program & specialty coaching

Scale Phase

  • July 2019: expansion of

efforts

slide-3
SLIDE 3

29

Research questions

ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE How did programs experience Assessment TA? To what extent are TA providers perceived to be available and knowledgeable by programs? To what extent is Assessment TA related to the number and type of technical reviews requested by programs? QSLA TIER RATINGS What are programs’ perceptions about their Tier Rating? To what extent do programs understand their Tier Rating and the rationale for their rating? What concerns do programs have about the accuracy or fairness of their Tier Rating? COACHING How closely does the implemented Program Coaching align with the program design? How and to what extent do Program and Specialty Coaches coordinate to support programs? How closely does the implemented Program Coaching and Specialty Coaching dosages match the prescribed dosages? What factors affect the ability to implement the prescribed dosage?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

30

QSLA developmental evaluation proposed approach

  • Propose multiple data collection methods to answer current research

questions

  • Throughout the study, RAND will share findings in several ways – including

rapid feedback memos

  • Plan is likely to change and timing to shift based on emerging findings,

system needs, and context Data collection activities depend on developmental evaluation partners

slide-5
SLIDE 5

31

Dec 2018 Jan 2019 Feb 2019 Mar 2019 Apr 2019 May 2019 Jun 2019 Project Launch & Kick‐Off Meeting Recruit Participants Contact key stakeholders Request QSLA provider and coach contact information Collect Data Administrative data analysis Key stakeholder interviews TA and coaching observations QLSA provider survey TA and coach interviews and focus groups QSLA provider focus groups

Data collection timeline

slide-6
SLIDE 6

32

Data Feb. 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 Administrative Data Analysis iPinwheel Administrative Data Analysis

  • Answer RQs related to:
  • Coaching dosage
  • Whether support matches prescribed dosage
  • Whether TA is related to requested number and type of reviews

Administrative data analysis

Data collection/analysis planned

Table key:

slide-7
SLIDE 7

33

Data Feb. 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 Key Stakeholder Interviews Key stakeholder interviews

  • Answer RQs related to:
  • Coaching and TA component design and implementation
  • QSLA system development and decision‐making process
  • Plans for the scale phase
  • Conduct interviews with QLSA workgroup members

Key stakeholder interviews

Data collection/analysis planned

Table key:

slide-8
SLIDE 8

34

Data Feb. 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 Coach and TA

  • bservations

Coach and TA observations

  • Answer RQs related to:
  • Coaching and TA implementation
  • Conduct observations with program, specialty, and existing coaches and TA

providers

Coach and TA observations

Data collection/analysis planned

Table key:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

35

Data Feb. 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 QSLA Provider Survey QSLA Provider Survey

  • Answer RQs related to:
  • Provider perceptions of Tier Ratings, coaching and TA
  • What constitutes a typical coaching session
  • Whether coaching is coordinated and aligned with provider needs

QSLA provider survey

Data collection/analysis planned

Table key:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

36

Data Feb. 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 TA and Coach Interviews and Focus Groups TA and Coach Interviews and Focus Groups

  • Answer RQs related to:
  • Perceptions and understanding of QSLA components
  • What constitutes a typical coaching or TA session
  • Whether coaching is coordinated

TA and coach interviews and focus groups

Data collection/analysis planned

Table key:

slide-11
SLIDE 11

37

Data Feb. 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 QSLA Provider Focus Groups QSLA Provider Focus Groups

  • Answer RQs related to:
  • How providers make decisions regarding coaching
  • How existing coaching fits within the QSLA model
  • Provider perceptions of Tier Ratings, coaching and TA

QSLA provider focus groups

Data collection/analysis planned

Table key:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

38

Sharing findings from QSLA developmental evaluation

Rapid feedback memos Sense‐making meetings Public presentations Final public report

slide-13
SLIDE 13

39

Discuss in table group:

  • Question: What are the top two things you hope to learn from

this developmental evaluation?

  • Question: What research questions or assessment TA, tier

rating or coaching topics are missing from the plan? On slido, you can enter your response or table responses anonymously

slide-14
SLIDE 14

40

Thank you!