Radial, Pedal and Direct SFA Puncture for SFA Revascularization - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

radial pedal and direct sfa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Radial, Pedal and Direct SFA Puncture for SFA Revascularization - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Radial, Pedal and Direct SFA Puncture for SFA Revascularization Beau Hawkins, MD, FSCAI May 22, 2019 Disclosures None Rationale for Alternative Access Anatomical Needs Lack of antegrade stump Iliofemoral tortuosity


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Radial, Pedal and Direct SFA Puncture for SFA Revascularization

Beau Hawkins, MD, FSCAI May 22, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • None
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Rationale for Alternative Access

  • Anatomical Needs
  • Lack of antegrade stump
  • Iliofemoral tortuosity
  • Procedural efficiency
  • Failure to cross or re-enter

antegrade

  • Reduce complications

Mustapha et al Interv Cardiol 2015;7:1-17

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Transradial Approach- Important Distances

Nakamura et al. Ind Heart J 2018;70:99-104

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Transradial Approach

  • Familiar to coronary operators
  • Low bleeding risk
  • Pushability/torque limited
  • Limited equipment for

complications (eg perforation)

Korabathina et al. Vasc Heath Risk 2010;6:503-9

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Retrograde Popliteal

  • Advantages
  • Support/pushability
  • Full armamentarium of tools

(stents, atherectomy)

  • Disadvantages
  • Prone positioning
  • Hemostasis issues
  • Single access
  • Manual pressure versus balloon

tamponade

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Retrograde Popliteal- Complications

Large AV Fistula

  • 68 year old male with RLE

claudication

  • Prior RSFA Stenting for CLI

(foot ulcer)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Retrograde Pedal

  • 60 yo female with LLE ischemic

rest pain

  • Prior distal aorta/iliac stenting

with high neo-carina

  • Radials occluded, “no brachial

lab”

  • Plan- retrograde AT approach

9 cm SFA/pop CTO RCFA

  • cclusion

Diffuse SFA disease

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Retrograde Pedal

  • Ultrasound-guidance 5/6 slender

sheath

  • Retrograde crossing with

hydrophilic .014’’ wire/.018 catheter

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Retrograde Pedal

  • PTA/stent
  • Manual pressure x 20 min
  • Bedrest x 1hour
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Retrograde Pedal- 38 yo female with rest pain, prior aortofemoral bypass

Courtesy of M. Adu-Fadel

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Retrograde Pedal

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Retrograde Pedal

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Retrograde Pedal

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Retrograde Pedal- Practical Aspects

  • Ideal for simple SFA lesions and assists with learning curve
  • No antegrade access needed
  • Need adequate pre-procedure imaging (eg angiogram, duplex)
  • Anticoagulate well
  • Spasm is common- frequent vasodilators
  • Impact of tibial thrombosis is less clear
  • Caution needed in CLI patients with poor outflow
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Where is Complex SFA Intervention Headed?

Ruzsa et al. JACC Interv 2018;11:1062-71

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Alternative Access Selection- Personal Preferences

  • Dynamic algorithm with annual modifications
  • Primary access: Pedal>radial
  • Primary pedal if approaching a simple, stenotic lesion
  • Primary femoral if complex, lengthy CTO or multilevel intervention planned
  • No brachial
  • No retrograde popliteal
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusions

  • Alternative access site use can improve procedural success
  • Procedural complexity and complication risk may be reduced with

radial and/or pedal approaches

  • Increasingly complex lesions can be tackled via alternative access

using proper patient selection and preparation

slide-19
SLIDE 19