quotient numerical semigroups work in progress
play

Quotient Numerical Semigroups (work in progress) V tor Hugo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quotient Numerical Semigroups (work in progress) V tor Hugo Fernandes FCT-UNL/CAUL (joint work with Manuel Delgado ) February 5, 2010 Iberian meeting on numerical semigroups Granada 2010 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 1 / 16


  1. Quotient Numerical Semigroups (work in progress) V´ ıtor Hugo Fernandes FCT-UNL/CAUL (joint work with Manuel Delgado ) February 5, 2010 Iberian meeting on numerical semigroups Granada 2010 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 1 / 16

  2. Definition Let N be a numerical semigroup and let I = { n ∈ N + | n > F ( N ) } be the canonical ideal of N . The quotient numerical semigroup ( qns ) associated to N is the Rees quotient Q ( N ) = N + / I , with N + = N \ { 0 } . Recall that N + / I = {{ x } | x ∈ N + \ I } ∪ { I } and so we may identify Q ( N ) with the semigroup ( N + \ I ∪ {∞} , ⊕ ), where the binary operation ⊕ is defined by � x + y if x + y < F ( N ) x ⊕ y = ∞ otherwise, and x ⊕ ∞ = ∞ ⊕ x = ∞ ⊕ ∞ = ∞ , for all x , y ∈ N + \ I (usually we denote ⊕ simply by +). Notice that, with this identification, a qns may be associated with several distinct numerical semigroups. 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 2 / 16

  3. Examples I = N + (“the” trivial qns ) • N = < 1 > = ⇒ Q ( N ) = {∞} , • N = < 3 , 5 > = ⇒ Q ( N ) = { 3 , 5 , 6 , ∞} , I = { 8 , →} 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 3 / 16

  4. • N = < 4 , 5 > = ⇒ Q ( N ) = { 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , ∞} , I = { 12 , →} 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 4 / 16

  5. • N = < 4 , 7 > = ⇒ Q ( N ) = { 4 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , ∞} , I = { 18 , →} 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 5 / 16

  6. • N = < 7 , 8 , 9 > = ⇒ Q ( N ) = { 7 , 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , ∞} , I = { 21 , →} • N = < 7 , 8 , 9 , 20 > = ⇒ Q ( N ) = { 7 , 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , ∞} , I = { 20 , →} 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 6 / 16

  7. Let S = { a 1 < a 2 < · · · < a n < ∞} be a qns . Notice that, by considering the natural order induced by the usual order of N , we may view S as an (linearly) ordered semigroup. Let A be the set of irreducible/indecomposable elements of S , i.e. A = S \ ( S + S ). Then A is the unique minimal generating set ( mgs ) of S . Observe that a qns may not be completely defined by its mgs and addition in N : in general, we also need to know, for instance, its largest finite element (i.e. a n ) or the number of finite elements (i.e. n ). Examples • S = { 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , ∞} = < 4 , 5 > S = Q ( < 4 , 5 > ) • S = { 3 , 6 , 7 , ∞} = < 3 , 7 > S = Q ( < 3 , 7 , 11 > ) • S = { 3 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , ∞} = < 3 , 7 > S = Q ( < 3 , 7 > ) • S = { 2 , 4 , ∞} = < 2 > S = Q ( < 2 , 5 > ) • S = { 2 , 4 , 6 , ∞} = < 2 > S = Q ( < 2 , 7 > ) • S = { 2 , 4 , 6 , . . . , 2 n , ∞} = < 2 > S = Q ( < 2 , 2 n + 1 > ) 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 7 / 16

  8. Problem How to characterize the (finite) subsets A of N + that are a mgs of some qns ? Moreover, how many qns ’s have A as a mgs ? For instance, { 1 } and { 2 , 3 } are not a mgs of a qns . Clearly, if A is a mgs of a qns then 1 �∈ A . Furthermore, A must be irreducible , i.e. no element of A can be expressed as a non-trivial sum of elements of A . Let A be a finite irreducible set of N + and denote by Q A the family of qns ’s that admit A as mgs . Then, clearly, gcd ( A ) > 1 ⇐ ⇒ | Q A | = ℵ 0 . On the other hand, if gcd ( A ) = 1 then, being N the numerical semigroup generated by A , clearly Q A � = ∅ ⇐ ⇒ F ( N ) > max ( A ) . 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 8 / 16

  9. “Notable elements” Let S = { a 1 < a 2 < · · · < a n < ∞} be a non-trivial qns . “Numerical” definitions A gap of S is an element of G ( S ) = { 1 , . . . , a n + 1 } \ { a 1 , . . . , a n } . The Frobenius number of S is the number F ( S ) = a n + 1 (the largest gap). The gender of S is the number of gaps of S : g ( S ) = | G ( S ) | . The embedding dimension of S , denoted by e ( S ), is the cardinality of the minimal generating set of S . The multiplicity of S is the element m ( S ) = a 1 (the smallest element of S and of the minimal generating set of S ). Problem From a minimal set of generators of a qns S and | S | , how to/can we compute “efficiently” F ( S )? 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 9 / 16

  10. “Abstract” definitions Let S be a qns. The isofrobenius number of S is iF ( S ) = min { F ( T ) | T is a qns isomorphic to S } . The isogender of S is ig ( S ) = min { g ( T ) | T is a qns isomorphic to S } . The isomultiplicity of S is im ( S ) = min { m ( T ) | T is a qns isomorphic to S } . Problem How to/Can we compute “efficiently” these numbers? Problem Can these three numbers be obtained from the same qns ? Is it unique? 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 10 / 16

  11. Example Let S = { 5 , ∞} = Q ( < 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 > ). Then F ( S ) = 6, g ( S ) = 5 and m ( S ) = 5. On the other hand, clearly, S is isomorphic to T = { 2 , ∞} = Q ( < 2 , 5 > ) and iF ( S ) = F ( T ) = 3, ig ( S ) = g ( T ) = 2 and im ( S ) = m ( T ) = 2. Regarding the embedding dimensions, it is obvious that: Let ϕ : S − → T be an isomorphism of qns ’s and let A be the mgs of S . Then ϕ ( A ) is the mgs of T . In particular, e ( S ) = e ( T ). Problem How to test “efficiently” if two qns ’s are isomorphic? Problem Characterize the automorphism group of a qns . 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 11 / 16

  12. We have: Let S and T be two qns ’s. Let A and B be the mgs ’s of S and T , respectively. Let � A | R � be a presentation of S . Then, the isomorphisms from S into T are the homomorphisms that extend the bijections f : A − → B ⇒ ¯ f ( u ) = ¯ that preserve � A | R � (i.e. such that ( u , v ) ∈ R = f ( v ) , for all u , v ∈ FS ( A ), where ¯ f : FS ( A ) − → T is the canonical homomorphism from the free semigroup FS ( A ) into T that extends f ). In particular: Let S be a qns , A the mgs of S and � A | R � a presentation of S . Then, the automorphisms of S are the endomorphisms of S that extend the permutations of A that preserve � A | R � . 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 12 / 16

  13. Problem Find a “nice” presentation for a qns . It is easy to obtain a presentation for a qns S = Q ( N ) by adding F ( N ) + 1 relations to a minimal presentation of the numerical semigroup N . Conjecture We obtain a presentation for a qns S = Q ( N ) by adding m ( S ) relations to a minimal presentation of the numerical semigroup N . If this is conjecture holds, then we have a presentation for S (that may be considered on its mgs ) with less than or equal to m ( S )( m ( S ) + 1) / 2 relations. Problem What about minimal presentations for a qns ? 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 13 / 16

  14. Let S be a finite semigroup. We say that S is nilpotent if | S n | = 1, for some n ∈ N + . T.F.A.E. for a finite semigroup S (with zero): S is nilpotent; S satisfies an equation of the form x 1 · · · x n = 0, for some n ∈ N + ; S satisfies an equation of the form x n = 0, for some n ∈ N + ; S satisfies the pseudoequation x ω = 0. Example Any qns is a commutative nilpotent semigroup. A pseudovariety of semigroups is a class of finite semigroups closed under formation of finite direct products, subsemigroups and homomorphic images. Examples The classes N of nilpotent semigroups, Com of commutative (finite) semigroups and N ∩ Com are pseudovarieties of semigroups. 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 14 / 16

  15. Let Num be the class of all qns ’s (up to isomorphism). Then Num ⊂ N ∩ Com and this inclusion is strict: the semigroup � a , b | a 2 = b 2 = 0 , ab = ba � = { a , b , a + b , ∞} is commutative and nilpotent but it is not (isomorphic to) a qns . The class Num is, clearly, closed under formation of subsemigroups but it is not closed under formation of homomorphic images or finite direct products: Let N = < 4 , 5 > . Then N = { 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 →} and so S = Q ( N ) = { 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , ∞} . Clearly, I = { 8 , 10 , ∞} is an ideal of S and S / I is defined by the presentation � a , b | a 2 = b 2 = 0 , ab = ba � . Thus, S / I �∈ Num . Let S = Q ( � 2 , 5 � ) = { 2 , ∞} and T = Q ( � 2 , 7 � ) = { 2 , 4 , ∞} . Then the direct product S × T = { [2 , 2] , [4 , 2] , [2 , 4] , [4 , 4] , [2 , 6] , ∞} is not (isomorphic) to a qns , since [2 , 2] + [2 , 2] = [2 , 2] + [4 , 2] = [4 , 2] + [4 , 2] (which can not happen in a qns ). 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 15 / 16

  16. Theorem The class Num generates the pseudovariety N ∩ Com . Sketch of the proof. Let V be the pseudovariety generated by Num . We suppose that V is strictly contained in N ∩ Com . Hence, V must satisfy a non-trivial pseudoequation of the form x α 1 1 · · · x α n = x β 1 1 · · · x β n n , n with α i , β i ∈ N 0 ∪ { ω } and x 1 , . . . , x n not necessarily distinct. The proof follows by finding a qns which does not satisfy this pseudoequation. 2010.02.03-05 (Universidad de Granada) 16 / 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend