quantum ordered disordered phases in
play

Quantum Ordered & Disordered Phases in XY Pyrochlores Er 2 Ti 2 O - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum Ordered & Disordered Phases in XY Pyrochlores Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 and Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 K.A. Ross 1,2 ! J.P.C. Ruff 1, 3 ! E. Kermarrec 1 ! H.A. Dabkowska 1 ! ! L. Savary 4,5 L. Balents 4 1 McMaster University 2 Colorado State University 3 CHESS


  1. Quantum Ordered & Disordered Phases in XY Pyrochlores Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 and Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 K.A. Ross 1,2 ! J.P.C. Ruff 1, 3 ! E. Kermarrec 1 ! H.A. Dabkowska 1 ! ! L. Savary 4,5 L. Balents 4 1 McMaster University 2 Colorado State University 3 CHESS Cornell University ! 4 Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, UC Santa Barbara 5 MIT ! Bruce D. Gaulin McMaster University !

  2. Real Pyrochlores: playgrounds for frustration R 2 Ti 2 O 7 “Rare earth titanates” R 3+ Ising Heisenberg XY Differences in Anisotropy is very important ! Single Ion Anisotropy Interactions Ground state Ho, Dy Ising FM spin ice Tb Ising AFM spin liquid Gd Heisenberg AFM partial order Er XY AFM “order by disorder” Yb XY FM “quantum spin ice”

  3. Geometric Frustration from Tetrahedra Pyrochlore freedom of choice for each tetrahedron leads to a macroscopic degeneracy: NO Long Range Order

  4. Structure of Ice Ferro coupling + [111] anisotropy “2 in 2 out” 6-fold degenerat e Correspondance to Spin Ice

  5. Spin Ice a ! • Classical macroscopic degeneracy ! • Supports monopole excitations b ! • Rare example of deconfined excitations in 3D e c C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S.L. Sondi, Nature, 451, 43 (2007) L. Balents, Nature, 464, 199 (2010)

  6. “Quantum” Spin Ice O. Benton et al, Phys. Rev. B 86 , 2012 r · ~ ~ B = ⇢ m B = ~ ~ r ⇥ ~ A E = − @ ~ A ~ @ t • Can tunnel between ice rules states • Introduces fluctuations in the gauge field • Electric monopoles — coherent, propagating wavepacket of ice configurations • Magnetic monopoles — violate ice rules, i.e. 3-in 1-out • Gauge photons — transverse fluctuations of gauge field

  7. Crystal Field Environment at the RE Site (2J+1) degenerate multiplet splits in presence of strong crystalline electric field from O 2- neighbours

  8. Crystal Field E ff ects Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 Dy 2 Ti 2 O 7 Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 Malkin et al, PHYSICAL Dasgupta et al, Solid Bertin et al., J. Phys: CM, REVIEW B 70 , 075112 State Communications 24, 256003, 2012 (2004) 139 (2006) 424–429 550K 680K 500K 450K 300K 76K g || ~ 10 ! g || = 2.32 ! g || = 1.78 ! g ⊥ ~ 0 g ⊥ = 6.80 g ⊥ = 4.28 4f 13 J = 7/2 4f 11 J = 15/2 4f 9 J = 15/2

  9. Crystal Field E ff ects: Crystal Field E ff ects How do you get S e ff ective =1/2 from J=big, ie J=15/2? • Hund’s rules: L+S=J states, split by following L. Balents crystal fields ⌘ 2 ⇣ ~ H ion = − D J i · ˆ n i D<0: Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 , Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 D>0: spin ice E - 15 - 13 - 11 - 9 - 7 - 5 - 3 - 1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 J z J z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 15 - 13 - 11 - 9 - 7 - 5 - 3 - 1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

  10. Time of Flight Neutron Scattering “Disk Chopper Spectrometer” ! (DCS) ! ! @ NIST Center for Neutron Research !

  11. Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 by the numbers: 00L - - ~240mK - - - HH • Ferromagnetic “XY” pyrochlore ! • “ T C ” ~ 240 mK ! • CW T ~ +0.6 K g ⊥ / g || ~ 2.4 ! • Rods of scattering observed previously ! by Bonville et al.

  12. Application of a Field Field removes diffuse scattering 30mK, 2T 30mK, 0T 500mK, 0T

  13. Weak magnetic field // [110] induces LRO: ! appearance of long-lived spin waves at low T and moderate H

  14. K. A. Ross, J. P. C. Ruff, C. P. Adams, J. S. Gardner, H. A. Dabkowska, Y. Qiu, J. R. D. Copley, and B. D. Gaulin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 227202 (2009)

  15. Anisotropic Exchange RE ions are heavy - spin orbit coupling is strong ! → anisotropic exchange possible ! ! local XY -plane ! 4 symmetry-allowed terms for exchange tensor ! ! S. Curnoe. Phys. Rev. B 78, 094418 (2008). local z -axes Hermele, M., Fisher, M. & Balents, L. Phys. Rev. B 69, 064404 (2004) L. Savary, L. Balents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 037202 (2012)

  16. Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 field polarized state H along [1-10] data fit data calc “Quantum Spin Ice” (meV)

  17. Gauge Mean Field Phase Diagram J ±± = 0 0.8 Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 FM 0.6 » J z ± »ê J zz 0.4 CFM AFM 0.2 QSL 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 J ± ê J zz L. Savary, L. Balents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 037202 (2012) ! ! see also: H. Yan, O. Benton, L. Jaubert, N. Shannon, arXiv 1311.3501v1 (2013) How close are we to the Coulomb J ±± /J zz QSL phase or Coulomb FM phase?

  18. MFT phase diagram: Yb 2 Ti 2 O 7 Huge suppression of T c because of quantum fluctuations MFT Transition ! from spinwave fits Observed range of sensitivity of T c in specific heat

  19. AF planar pyrochlore: Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 : Θ CW ∼ -22 K

  20. 2003-2012: The nine-year Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 ground state puzzle “What is the mechanism leading to ordered state selection?” ! P. Stasiak, P. A. McClarty, M. J. P. Gingras, Phys. Rev. B 89, 024425 (2014) ! - Not dipolar interactions → leads to “ ψ 3 ” state (roughly Palmer-Chalker) State selected by isotropic J plus ! Observed state long range dipolar ψ 3 ψ 2

  21. Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 @ 50 mK

  22. 50 mK, 0 T T (K) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (000) (220) (222) (111) (000)

  23. 50 mK, 0.5 T T (K) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (000) (220) (222) (111) (000)

  24. 50 mK, 1.0 T T (K) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (000) (220) (222) (111) (000)

  25. 50 mK, 1.5 T T (K) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (000) (220) (222) (111) (000)

  26. 50 mK, 2.0 T T (K) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (000) (220) (222) (111) (000)

  27. 50 mK, 3.0 T T (K) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (000) (220) (222) (111) (000)

  28. Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 J. P. C. Ruff, J.P. Clancy, A. Bourque, M.A. White, M. Ramazanoglu, J.S. Gardner, Y. Qiu, J. R. D. Copley, M.B. Johnson, H.A. Dabkowska, and B. D. Gaulin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 147205 (2008)

  29. Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 : two experiments and fits H = 3T E (meV) data fit E (meV) (HH2) (-H+1, -H+1, H+2) (-2H, H+1, H-1) (H-1, 2, -H-1) (HHH) (00L) (22L) H || to [1-10] H || to [111] x x x x x x x x (meV)

  30. Degeneracy of Ground State → continuous degeneracy at Mean Field level ! ! → Cannot be broken by dipolar or further range interactions ! ! → parameterized by single angle parameter: alpha ! alpha = pi/6 alpha = 0 ! → degeneracy broken by OBD gives states with alpha = 0, pi/3, etc. ! ! → does the data show the 6 OBD states?

  31. Order by Disorder (quantum and thermal) ‘accidental degeneracy’: ! Goldstone at the mean field level, the ground state shows a continuous modes! symmetry that is not present in the Hamiltonian. ! ! ! ! ! The necklaces represent When dynamics are softer along specific directions, higher surfaces of constant free density of low E modes = more microstates available at energy in configuration specific “alphas” ! space ! → the entropic term in F = E-TS selects the ordered state Gap! at non-zero T (thermal ObD) ! OR ! → Quantum fluctuations select the ordered state even at zero T (Quantum ObD) i.e. fluctuations introduce an effective term to the Hamiltonian that breaks the accidental degeneracy

  32. Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 : zero field calculation H = 0T data Calc Calc States selected by Order by Disorder show better agreement

  33. A Very Small Gap Exists! ��� �� �������������� �������������� ��� ��� ���� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ���� ∆ ������ ���� ���� � ��� ��� �� ��������������� ��������������� ���� ����� ���� ��� ���������� � ��� ��� ���� � � ��� � �������� ���� �������� �������� ���� �������� � ��� � ��� ��� ������������������ [-H + 2/3, -H + 2/3, H + 4/3] ������� ! Extremely high energy resolution measurements at the NCNR (NIST) 24 hours of counting on a 7 gram crystal

  34. Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 Bragg Peaks H H c = 1.74 T 6 domains 2 domains 1 domain H || to [1-10]

  35. MFT phase diagram: Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 Little suppression of T c due to frustration, fluctuations H //110 2.5 2.0 PM H cexp H H in T L 1.5 MFT 1.0 ordered Transition ! 0.5 from spinwave fits 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 T H in K L T cexp T CMF /T Cexp ~ 2.1 H CMF = H Cexp !

  36. Collaboration Lucile Savary Leon Balents Edwin Kermarrec Jacob Ruff Kate Ross K.A. Ross, L. Savary, B. D. Gaulin, and L. Balents, Quantum Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice , Phys. Rev. X 1 , 021002 (2011). L. Savary, K. A. Ross, B.D. Gaulin, J.P.C. Ruff, and L. Balents, Order by Quantum Disorder in Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 167201 (2012). K. A. Ross, Y. Qiu, J.R.D. Copley, H.A. Dabkowska, and B.D. Gaulin, Order by Quantum Disorder Spin Wave Gap in Er 2 Ti 2 O 7 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057201 (2013).

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend