Quantum Mechanics of Mixed Systems Diego A. Wisniacki - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quantum mechanics of mixed systems
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quantum Mechanics of Mixed Systems Diego A. Wisniacki - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum Mechanics of Mixed Systems Diego A. Wisniacki UBA-Argentina Luchon 2015 Let us start with an example .. H ( p, q, t ) = 1 2 cos(2 p ) + k X 2 cos(2 q ) ( t nk ) n p n +1 = p n + k sin(2 q n ) (mod 1) , q n +1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quantum Mechanics of Mixed Systems

Diego A. Wisniacki UBA-Argentina Luchon 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Let us start with an example…..

slide-3
SLIDE 3

pn+1 = pn + k sin(2πqn) (mod 1), qn+1 = qn − k sin(2πpn+1) (mod 1),

H(p, q, t) = 1 2π cos(2πp) + k 2π cos(2πq) X

n

δ(t − nk)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

q p 1 1 k=0.06 k=0.11 1 k=0.21 k=0.26 k=0.36 k=0.46

slide-5
SLIDE 5

This transition is dictated by the KAM and the Poincare-Birkhoff theorems

slide-6
SLIDE 6

I am interested the quantum manifestation of this transition

slide-7
SLIDE 7

In the 80’ Resonances AC

Uzer, Noid, Marcus JCP 83 Ozorio de Almeida JPC 84

In the 00’ Resonances Tunneling

Brodier, Schlagheck, Ullmo PRL’ 01 Annals of Phys. ‘02 Eltschka, Schlagheck PRL ‘05 Lock, Backer, Ketzmerik, Schlagheck PRL ‘10 Hanada, Shudo, Ikeda arXiv ‘15

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Quantum Harper map

ˆ Uk = exp[iNk cos(2πˆ q)] exp[iNk cos(2πˆ p)]

~ = 1 2πN

Evolution operator Map in a unit cell

1 1 q p

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Quantum Harper map: spectra

k φ

N=60

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Quantum Harper map: eigenfunctions

Hφ(q, p) = |hq, p|φi|2

Husimi distribution

  • Positive real function
  • For maps in a torus has exact N zeros
  • The set of zeros of H encodes the full

quantum information of the state

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Quantum Harper map: eigenfunctions

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Quantum Harper map: eigenfunctions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

I want to study the ACs generated by a resonance

slide-14
SLIDE 14

k φ

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

n1=5 n2=11

N=60

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

k φ Δn=6 Δn=10

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 0.5

1.2 0.185 0.21

k φ

f gh c d i j e (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (e) (d) (b) (a) (c) a b

N1=5 n2=11

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 0.5

1.2 0.185 0.21

k φ

f gh c d i j e (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (e) (d) (b) (a) (c) a b

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 0.5

1.2 0.185 0.21

k φ

f gh c d i j e (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (e) (d) (b) (a) (c) a b

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 0.5

1.2 0.185 0.21

k φ

f gh c d i j e (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (e) (d) (b) (a) (c) a b

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 0.5

1.2 0.185 0.21

k φ

f gh c d i j e (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (e) (d) (b) (a) (c) a b

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 0.5

1.2 0.185 0.21

k φ

f gh c d i j e (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (e) (d) (b) (a) (c) a b

slide-22
SLIDE 22

N=300 N=160 n1=9 n2=15 Δn=6 n1=18 n2=24

slide-23
SLIDE 23

N=300 n1=15 n2=27 n1=26 n2=44 Δn=6*2=12 Δn=6*3=18

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Resonance r islands

Δn=r*l

AC Classical Quantum

r ceros r*(l-1) ceros r*l ceros

State localized in the islands State localized in PO (Scaring???)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Semiclassical analysis of the gaps

slide-26
SLIDE 26

hTn1| H |Tn2i

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Semiclassical analysis of the gaps

Hr:s ' H0(Ir:s) +

X

l=1

Vr,l(Ir:s) cos(lrθ + φl)

δIr:s(θ) = I(−1)(Ir:s, θ) − Ir:s,

V r,l

sc = e−iϕl

iπrlk Z 2π exp(−irlθ) δIr:s(θ)dθ

∆φ ≈ |V r,l

sc k|

~ hn| Hres |n + rli = V r,l

sc

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Semiclassical analysis of the gaps

10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 0.16 0.21 0.26 0.31

10-8 10-4 0.11 0.21

h ∆φ

h∆φ

k

k

Δn=6 Δn=10

r=6 r=10

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Semiclassical analysis of the gaps

Δn=6 Δn=6*2 Δn=6*3

k

h ∆φ

h ∆φ

h

10-12 10-5 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 10-11 10-4 10-9 10-6

(a) (c) (b)

∆φ

r=6

~ = 1 2πN

N=80 N=300 N=160

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Semiclassical analysis of the gaps

k

∆φ

5

h

10-28 10-18 10-8 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.25

− ∆φ

3

h

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Universality

LiCN-LiNC C N Li

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Applications

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Experimental observation

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Classical nonlinear resonance imprints a systematic influence in

the quantum eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a mixed system.

  • Universal structure embedded in the spectra: states localized in

tori interact if the quantum numbers differ in a multiple of the order

  • f the resonance.
  • Eigenstates in the AC has a particular morphology. One state is

localized in the vicinity of the unstable PO and the other state is localized on the island chain.

  • These findings could be of importance in the design of optical

microcavities.

slide-35
SLIDE 35