quantifying abnormal muscle tone
play

Quantifying Abnormal Muscle Tone Due to Neurological Impairment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantifying Abnormal Muscle Tone Due to Neurological Impairment Thursday March 20 th , 2014 Starts at 12:00 PM EST Presented by Elizabeth Brokaw, PhD Kinesia HomeView TM Kinesia ProView TM 2 MyoSense 3 Outline Impact of Neurological


  1. Quantifying Abnormal Muscle Tone Due to Neurological Impairment Thursday March 20 th , 2014 Starts at 12:00 PM EST Presented by Elizabeth Brokaw, PhD

  2. Kinesia HomeView TM Kinesia ProView TM 2

  3. MyoSense 3

  4. Outline • Impact of Neurological Impairment – Abnormal Muscle Tone • MyoSense – Development – Bench Testing – Clinical Evaluation 4

  5. Individuals With Neurological Impairment • High incidence of neurological disorders – Abnormal muscle Stroke 795,000 tone – Reduced independence Center for Disease Control; Jan 2006 Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, 2002-2006 5

  6. Abnormal Muscle Tone • Resistance force to passive movement • Abnormal muscle tone presents in many different forms. – Rigidity – Dystonia – Spasticity – Hypertonia 6

  7. Rigidity Rigidity • Parkinson’s Disease – Stiffness or heaviness • Lead pipe • Cog wheel Lead Pipe Cog wheel Force Force UCD Medicine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJqKvajUC3k Speed/Position Position 7

  8. Dystonia • Cerebral Palsy – Rigid/Posturing – Unintentional movement Rigid Dystonia http://www.localmatters.co.nz/ http://www.ndta.org/clinicians-corner.php?id=4 8

  9. Spasticity Spasticity • Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury – Speed based – Catch www.strokeassociation.org 9

  10. Hypertonia Hypertonia • Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury – Range of motion 10

  11. Treatments Treatments • Various types of treatment – Botox – Baclofen – Phenol injections – Surgical intervention – Deep brain stimulation http://jarrettwilsontbi.wordpress.com/ 2013/08/05/tbi-is-truly-stunning-botox-images/ 11

  12. Issues with Abnormal Tone Management Tone Management • Abnormal tone types respond differently • Difficult to distinguish different types of tone – Cerebral palsy DBS Dystonia Baclofen Spasticity ? ? Spasticity Dystonia • Research limited by current clinical outcome measures 12

  13. Clinical Scales Clinical Scales • Specific aspects of abnormal tone • Modified Ashworth, Tardieu (spasticity) • Fahn Marsden Burke (dystonia) FMB Arm Evaluation 0 No dystonia present 1 Slight dystonia. Clinically insignificant 2 Mild. Obvious dystonia but not disabling 3 Moderate. Able to grasp, with some manual function 4 Severe. No useful grasp • Low resolution • Subjective interpretation 13

  14. MyoSense Development MyoSense Development • Quantitative assessment of abnormal tone • Integrate with conventional practice – Clinician worn • Reduce patient burden – Typical Assessment • Speed • Position • Force 14

  15. MyoSense Myosense • Prototype Hardware – Flexiforce FSR sensors and XBee – GLNT Movement Sensor (bluetooth) 15

  16. MyoSense Data • Information about orientation and speed • Correlate with force data 16

  17. MyoSense Bench Testing 17

  18. Simulated Abnormal Elbow Tone Threshold set at 45 deg/s 18

  19. Distinguishing Profiles • Hypertonia Evaluation – Move the simulated elbow at 5 deg/s • Position bins and average force • Correlation to theoretical = 0.93 19

  20. Distinguishing Profiles • Mod-Ashworth Evaluation – Move the simulated elbow at 90 deg/s • Speed bins and average force • Correlation to theoretical = 0.80 • High speed effects of device mechanics – Belts and filtering 20

  21. Comparing Different Abnormal Tone Profiles • Issue – High speed mechanical effects – Acceleration – Change in direction • Solution – Track specific speeds – Examine the change across speed 21

  22. Comparing Different Abnormal Tone Profiles • Tracking specific speeds – 5, 25, 45, 65, 85 deg/s • At each 20s trial – Average speed and average force 20 22

  23. Comparing Different Abnormal Tone Profiles • Correlation of 0.99 • Distinguish Profiles and Changes in magnitude 23

  24. Bench Testing Conclusion • Successful pilot evaluation of MyoSense • Clinical evaluation with individuals with spasticity, dystonia, and cerebral palsy 24

  25. MyoSense Clinical Evaluation 25

  26. Clinical Evaluation Protocol • Subjects – 10 Pure dystonia – 10 Pure spasticity – 10 Mixed dystonia and spasticity (Cerebral Palsy) – 30 Age matched controls • Clinician manipulates limb – 5, 45, 90, 135, 180 – wrist, elbow, knee, ankle – Mod Ashworth and Fahn Marsden Burke 26

  27. Preliminary Results Individual with Dystonia Unimpaired Control FMB = 1 FMB = 0 27

  28. Clinical Evaluation Goals • Goal from Clinical Evaluation – Differentiate types of abnormal muscle tone – Examine correlation to clinical measures • Commercialization – Effects of spasticity and dystonia – Effects of treatments 28

  29. Acknowledgements • Dr. Erwin Montgomery • Dr. Ilia Itin • Alexandria Wyant • Funding from NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R43NS076052-01A1) 29

  30. GLNT Movement Sensor http://glneurotech.com/motion-sensor 30

  31. Questions? For more information contact: Elizabeth Brokaw Ebrokaw@glneurotech.com

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend