Quality of Life of Children with Mental Illness Martha J. Molly - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quality of life of children
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quality of Life of Children with Mental Illness Martha J. Molly - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quality of Life of Children with Mental Illness Martha J. Molly Faulkner, PhD, CNP, LISW University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Childrens Psychiatric Center Outpatient Services Objectives History of Conceptual Development


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quality of Life of Children

with

Mental Illness

Martha J. “Molly” Faulkner, PhD, CNP, LISW University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Children’s Psychiatric Center Outpatient Services

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives

  • History of Conceptual Development of QOL
  • Quality of Life/Health Related Quality of Life
  • Why important?
  • Health Related Quality of Life
  • Research with Children
  • Resources and Measurement Tools
slide-3
SLIDE 3

History Concept QOL

Examines the necessity of a relationship between quality of care and quality of life and describes elements that impact both. Heroditus 450 BC- first recorded external audit of medical health services in Egypt.

  • “medicine practised among Egyptians on a plan of separation. Each physician treats a

single disorder and no more.”4 Aristotle (384-322 BC)- wrote of “the good life” and “living well” and public policy can help foster it. Florence Nightengale, detailed journal on conditions, structure, airflow, hygiene in battlefield of Crimean war and later in city hospitals in her Notes on Hospitals noted importance of patient outcome to the processes 1980s -present Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has evolved to include aspects of

  • verall quality of life that can be clearly shown to affect health—either physical or

mental.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Def efinition

Quality of life (QOL)

Complex, multifaceted construct that requires multiple approaches from different theoretical angles3 Broad multidimensional concept including subjective evaluations of both positive and negative aspects of life2 Composite of physical, social and emotional facets of the well-being that the individual deems as significant and relevant1. Reflects a number of subjective physical, social, and psychological aspects of health and is distinct from symptoms of the disorder and objective functional

  • utcomes
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Defin initio ions

QOL OL

  • Include both objective and subjective perspectives
  • Three Dimensions- physical, psychological, social

Social further divided into public and private domains

  • QOL describes individual’s subjective perception of

their situation in life as evidenced by their physical, psychological, and social functioning 9

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Definition

Health Related Quality of Life

  • Examines the necessity of a relationship between quality of care and

quality of life

  • Not uniformly defined
  • Subset of QOL, specific to person’s health 10 influenced by health

interventions 1

  • HRQOL closely depends on the subjectively perceived impact of the

disorder (and of the respective treatment) on the level of physical, psychological and social functioning

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Why Important?

Prevalence of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (Nami)

  • Four million children & adolescents suffer from a serious mental

disorder resulting in significant functional impairments at home, at school and with peers.

  • Of children ages 9 to 17, 21 percent have a diagnosable mental or

addictive disorder that causes at least minimal impairment.1

  • Half of all lifetime cases of mental disorders begin by age 14.
  • Long delays, sometimes decades, between the first onset of

symptoms and when people seek and receive treatment, despite available effective treatments.

  • An untreated mental disorder can lead to a more severe, more

difficult to treat illness and to the development of co-occurring mental illnesses.3

  • In any given year, only 20 percent of children with mental

disorders are identified and receive mental health services.4

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Why Important?

How does HRQoL Help Children & Adolescents with Mental Illness?

  • Clinically reveals areas of illness

where person is most affected to help clinician make best choices to care for patient4

  • Measures change in quality of

life over course of treatment

  • Understanding of how disease

affects a patient’s quality of life, helping to improve practitioner-patient relationship

  • Evaluate health services quality

and patient perception

  • Research by assessing how

disease impairs the patients’ subjective well being

  • Assess effectiveness and

different benefits of different treatments

  • Helps create policies and

monitoring of policy changes

  • Increasingly important

measure of outcome in child and adolescent mental health research and clinical practice

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why Important?

How does HRQoL Help Children & Adolescents with Mental Illness?

  • HRQOL is an important component of health surveillance and

generally considered valid indicators of service needs and intervention outcomes.

  • Self-assessed health status proved to be more powerful predictor of

mortality and morbidity than many objective measures of health.9- 10

  • HRQOL measures make it possible to scientifically demonstrate

impact of health on quality of life, going well beyond the old paradigm that was limited to what can be seen under a microscope.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

HRQOL Tools for Children and Adolescents

  • Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)
  • Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) proven success in

measuring the QOL across different diseases in children and is well validated in different languages.

  • Child Health and Illness Profile
  • KIDSCREEN-27
  • International Classification of Functioning, Disease and Health by

WHO assess degree of disability caused by disease or disorder

  • International Classification of Functioning, Disease, and Health 6
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Research

Health Related Quality of LIfe

  • HRQOL research in children with mental illness is in early stages and

limited

  • Limitations of current studies:
  • No identification if children on meds or not
  • No self measures, only parental input
  • Overlap of certain questions
  • Diagnoses are not verified
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Research

Sawyer et al. (2002) used the CHQ-Parent Form 50 to assess the HRQOL of children and adolescents (6-17 years) with ADHD, major depressive disorder or conduct disorder versus children with a physical disorder or no disorder.

  • Children with psychiatric disorders had consistently worse HRQL in as

compared to children with no disorder

  • Specifically on scales of Mental Health, Physical Health, General

Health Perceptions and the Pain and Discomfort.

  • And had significantly worse HRQL on all scales except Physical Health

and perceived interference with physical activities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Research

  • Bastiaansen, Koot, Bongers, Varni & Verhulst (2004) used the

PedsQL 4.0TM parent and child forms for ages 5-7, 8-12 and 13-18, in children referred for psychiatric problems to assess its effectiveness in assessing the QOL of this population.

  • Children referred for psychiatric problems had significantly lower

mean PedsQL 4.0TM than children not referred for psychiatric problems.

  • They also had scores similar to children with cancer or rheumatic

diseases.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Research

  • Dey, Landolt, & Meichun (2012)
  • Systematically reviewed studies

about the quality of life (QOL) of children with various mental disorders vs healthy controls described limitations in these studies.

  • QOL of children with various mental

disorders is compromised across multiple domains.

  • The largest effect sizes were found

for psychosocial and family-related domains and for the total QOL score, whereas physical domains generally were less affected. Limitations in the existing literature

  • lack of study samples drawn from

the general population,

  • the failure to use self-ratings
  • not determining whether the

children were receiving medication for their mental disorder

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Research

  • Dey, Landolt, & Meichun (2012)

results

  • ADHD, Conduct Disorders- reduced

HRQOL psychosocial and family- related subscales whereas no reduction in physical subscales

  • Autism -parent rated social

subscale most compromised and physical health least compromised while children perceived their physical health the most compromised and school least affected

  • Schizophrenia/schizoaffective

disorder-largest ES for psychosocial and family related subscales Mood disorders-bipolar disorders reduced overall HRQOL and psychosocial, family related and physical

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Research

Weitkamp, Daniels, Romer & Wiegand-Grefe (2013)

  • used the KIDSCREEN-27 to measure the association of HRQOL to

internalizing and externalizing symptoms and determine what extent child and environmental characteristics relate to poor

  • HRQOL. Data for 120 participants ages 6 to 18 initiating outpatient

psychotherapy treatment. Children 11 yrs and older and parents filled out questionnaire.

  • Lower HRQOL associated with internalizing more than

externalizing symptoms in self and parent report in psychological well-being, social support and peers and well being with school environment with moderate to large effect sizes..

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Resources

  • 1. Connolly, M. A., & Johnson, J. A. (1999). Measuring quality of life in

paediatric patients. Pharmacoeconomics, 166, 605-625.

  • 3. Theofilou, P. (2013). Quality of life definition and measurement.

Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2(9,1), p.150-162.

  • 4. WHO (1997). The world health organization quality of life instruments.

Programme on mental health. WHOQOL, Measuring quality of life. Division of mental health and prevention of substance abuse. World Health Organization.

  • 5. Rosser, R. (1993). The history of health related quality of life in 10 ½
  • paragraphs. The Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 86, 315-319.
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 6. Shackman, G. (2005). Measuring quality of life using free and

public domain data. Social Research Update, 47.

  • 7. Coghill, D. (2009). Practitioner review: quality of life in child mental

health - Conceptual challenges and practical choices. Journal of Child Psychological Psychiatry, 50:544–61.

  • 8. Wallander, J., (2010). Quality of life measurements in children and

adolescents: Issues, instruments, and applications. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57:571–85.

  • 9. Wehmeier,P.J. (2010). Social and emotional impairment of ADHD in

Children and adolescents and the Impact upon quality of life. Journal

  • f Adolescent Health 46 (2010) 209–217
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 10. Dey, Landolt, & Meichun (2012). Health-related quality of life

among children with mental disorders: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research. 21:1797-1814.

  • Bastiaansen, D., Koot, H. M., Bongers, I. L., Varni, J.W., & Verhulst, F.
  • C. (2004). Measuring quality of life in children referred for psychiatric

problems: Psychometric properties of the PedsQLTM 4.0 generic core

  • scales. Quality of Life Research, 132, 489-495.
  • http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=federal_and_state_poli

cy_legislation&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm &ContentID=43804