quality improvement and pragmatic
play

Quality Improvement and Pragmatic Research Jonathan Finkelstein, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oversight on the borderline: Quality Improvement and Pragmatic Research Jonathan Finkelstein, MD, MPH Vice Chair, Quality and Outcomes, Department of Medicine Boston Childrens Hospital Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Population


  1. Oversight on the borderline: Quality Improvement and Pragmatic Research Jonathan Finkelstein, MD, MPH Vice Chair, Quality and Outcomes, Department of Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Population Medicine Harvard Medical School

  2. I have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

  3. • This presentation is based on the work of the QI and Pragmatic Trials Workgroup of the NIH Collaboratory/ PCORnet Ethics and Regulatory Task Force • Oversight on the borderline: Quality improvement and pragmatic research Clin Trials October 2015 12: 457-466, first published on September 15, 2015 • Jonathan Finkelstein • Laura Kolaczkowski • Andrew Brickman • Sarah Pallin • Alexander Capron • Mark Pletcher • Daniel Ford • Karen Staman • Adrijana Gombosev • Miguel Vazquez • Sarah Greene • Jeremy Sugarman • R. Peter Iafrate

  4. A (very) brief history of human subjects oversight • 1974 National Research Act creates the National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research • 1979 Belmont Report Released – “statement of basic ethical principles and guidelines to assist in resolving research problems” – Respect for Persons – Beneficence – Justice

  5. Federal definitions • Research -a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge • Human Subject - a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains: – data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or – identifiable private information

  6. Current oversight through implementation of the “Common Rule” • Assessment of Risks and Benefits – Nature and scope, systematic assessment • Selection of Subjects • Elements of Informed Consent – Information, comprehension, voluntariness • All under the Office of Human Research Protection, 45 CFR Part 46, part A, (the Common Rule) • Special protections for children

  7. Contrast with “Healthcare Operations”…

  8. Contrast with “Healthcare Operations”… • Routine Healthcare operations do not require oversight as human subjects research, but are regulated in many other ways by local, state, federal, and professional bodies.

  9. Contrast with “Healthcare Operations”… • Routine Healthcare operations do not require oversight as human subjects research, but are regulated in many other ways by local, state, federal, and professional bodies. • Quality improvement activities are considered part of routine operations.

  10. Current concern that the oversight regime requires updating

  11. Current concern that the oversight regime requires updating • Current research oversight system has generally worked well in: – Protecting patients from potential harm in research, particularly trials of experimental treatments – Maintaining voluntariness of participation (autonomy) – Protecting privacy

  12. Current concern that the oversight regime requires updating • Current research oversight system has generally worked well in: – Protecting patients from potential harm in research, particularly trials of experimental treatments – Maintaining voluntariness of participation (autonomy) – Protecting privacy • Has been less well suited to – Research on health systems interventions at the level of clinicians, hospitals, and systems – Pragmatic research about existing clinical alternatives – QI related research

  13. Current concern that the oversight regime requires updating • Current research oversight system has generally worked well in: – Protecting patients from potential harm in research, particularly trials of experimental treatments – Maintaining voluntariness of participation (autonomy) – Protecting privacy • Has been less well suited to – Research on health systems interventions at the level of clinicians, hospitals, and systems – Pragmatic research about existing clinical alternatives – QI related research • Major revision of the Common Rule now underway …

  14. What do we mean by Pragmatic Research, QI, and QI Research??

  15. What do we mean by Pragmatic Research, QI, and QI Research?? • Pragmatic research- creation of generalizable knowledge about relative effectiveness of alternative treatments or strategies, conducted in “real world” health care settings and designed to be maximally applicable under routine conditions.

  16. What do we mean by Pragmatic Research, QI, and QI Research?? • Pragmatic research- creation of generalizable knowledge about relative effectiveness of alternative treatments or strategies, conducted in “real world” health care settings and designed to be maximally applicable under routine conditions. • QI: “systemic data guided activities designed to bring about immediate improvements in health care delivery in particular settings.” (Hastings Center Report 2004)

  17. What do we mean by Pragmatic Research, QI, and QI Research?? • Pragmatic research- creation of generalizable knowledge about relative effectiveness of alternative treatments or strategies, conducted in “real world” health care settings and designed to be maximally applicable under routine conditions. • QI: “systemic data guided activities designed to bring about immediate improvements in health care delivery in particular settings.” (Hastings Center Report 2004) • QI Research: creation of generalizable knowledge about methods for measuring and improving health care quality, or that utilize quality improvement tools and strategies in study design or intervention.

  18. Relation of QI and QI research

  19. Relation of QI and QI research Research

  20. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Research on Clinical Alternatives (diagnostic, therapeutic, care delivery)

  21. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Research on best alternatives Clinical in particular Alternatives patients or (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery)

  22. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Research on Accepted best alternatives Clinical Clinical in particular Alternatives Standards patients or (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery)

  23. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Implementation Research on Accepted best alternatives Clinical and spread Clinical in particular using QI (and Alternatives Standards patients or other methods) (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery)

  24. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Implementation Research on Accepted best alternatives Clinical and spread Clinical in particular using QI (and Alternatives Standards patients or other methods) (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery) QI Research

  25. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Implementation Research on Accepted best alternatives Clinical and spread Clinical in particular using QI (and Alternatives Standards patients or other methods) (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery) QI Research Accepted Clinical Standards

  26. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Implementation Research on Accepted best alternatives Clinical and spread Clinical in particular using QI (and Alternatives Standards patients or other methods) (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery) QI Research Pragmatic Accepted Research on Clinical Health Care Standards Delivery or QI Methods

  27. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Implementation Research on Accepted best alternatives Clinical and spread Clinical in particular using QI (and Alternatives Standards patients or other methods) (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery) QI Research Knowledge about best Pragmatic Accepted Research on methods for Clinical bringing care in Health Care Standards line with Delivery or QI Methods accepted standards

  28. Relation of QI and QI research Research Pragmatic Knowledge of Implementation Research on Accepted best alternatives Clinical and spread Clinical in particular using QI (and Alternatives Standards patients or other methods) (diagnostic, setting therapeutic, care delivery) QI Research Knowledge about best Pragmatic Accepted Research on methods for Clinical bringing care in Health Care Standards line with Delivery or QI Methods accepted standards

  29. Relation of QI and QI research Research Knowledge of Implementation Accepted Pragmatic best alternatives and spread Clinical Research on in particular using QI (and Standards Clinical patients or other methods) Alternatives setting QI Research Knowledge Pragmatic about best Accepted Research on methods for Clinical Health Care bringing care in Standards Delivery or QI line with Methods accepted standards

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend