Quality aspects in IMP developments Tone Agasster Norwegian - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quality aspects in imp developments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quality aspects in IMP developments Tone Agasster Norwegian - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Your Logo Quality aspects in IMP developments Tone Agasster Norwegian Medicines Agency Presented by: Tone Agasster Assessor at Norwegian Medicines Agency and member of Quality WP An agency of the European Union Structure


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An agency of the European Union

Quality aspects in IMP developments

Tone Agasøster Norwegian Medicines Agency

Presented by: Tone Agasøster Assessor at Norwegian Medicines Agency and member of Quality WP

Your Logo

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Quality aspects in IMP developments 1

Structure

  • Importance of relevant Quality information in a CT application
  • Phase-dependent requirements for Quality documentation
  • EU guideline on Quality requirements of IMPs + Q&As
  • Relevance of keeping a future MA application in mind
  • Examples
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quality aspects in IMP developments 2

Include relevant Quality information in CT applications

  • Quality documentation (CMC)
  • Equally important as other parts of submission
  • Basis for drawing conclusions from the CT and links to future

MA application

  • Avoid major objections to the CT documentation during

assessment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Quality aspects in IMP developments 3

Phase-dependent requirements for Quality documentation

Focus on risk aspects:

  • Nature of product
  • State of development/ clinical phase
  • Patient population
  • Nature/ severity of the illness
  • Type and duration of clinical trial

Same type of documentation as for MA applications, less detailed

slide-5
SLIDE 5

EU GL on Quality requirements of IMPs + Q&As

Requirements to the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Quality documentation concerning IMPs in CTs

http: / / www.ema.europa.eu/ ema/ pages/ includes/ document/ open_document.jsp? webContentId= WC500003484

Q&A on Quality: Specific types of product - Quality of IMPs

http: / / www.ema.europa.eu/ ema/ index.jsp?curl= pages/ regulation/ q_and_a/ q_and _a_detail_000072.jsp&mid= WC0b01ac058002c2b0# section9 (e.g. How to set specifications for impurities) The GL and Q&As are available from the EMA Web page

Quality aspects in IMP developments 4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

EU GL (continued)

Requirements for:

  • IMPs
  • Modified authorised comparator products
  • Placebo

In all these cases there is a requirement for GMP manufacture

Quality aspects in IMP developments 5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EU GL (continued)

The GL is of an illustrative nature

  • Not exhaustive requirements for diversity of relevant products
  • With increasing complexity of product, increased level of detail

in documentation would be relevant

  • Sterilisation procedures other than terminal sterilisation:

sufficient information on manufacturing process/ validation

Quality aspects in IMP developments 6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Keeping a future MA application in mind

  • Qualification of impurities

Level of impurities decreases with development of the synthesis Degradants occuring after reconstitution, if relevant If route of synthesis is changed, other impurities may occur

  • APIs where composition or properties may vary

Batches for commercial product must be similar to batches in CT

  • At CT: Specification limits may not have been set, but

important to monitor all relevant parameters

  • At MAA: Differences between clinical vs commercial product

assessed (formulation/ composition and manufacturing process)

Quality aspects in IMP developments 7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Examples – level of detail in different phases

  • Specifications for impurities

Phase I: tentative upper limits Phase II and III: adjusted to the state of development

  • Validation of analytical procedures

Phase I: Confirmation of suitability + Summary of acceptance criteria and parameters to be validated Phase II and III: Validation results for all relevant parameters

  • Stability of product

Phase I: Start and commitment + Justification of shelf life Phase II and III: In addition, results accelerated/ long term conditions

Quality aspects in IMP developments 8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Examples – keeping future MAA in mind

  • Quality parameters with potential clinical relevance
  • For tablets (including modified release formulations) there is

no requirement to set a limit for dissolution rate. However, this should be monitored with a relevant test.

  • If a polymer is used as drug substance it is important to

monitor relevant characteristics such as molecular weight distribution in sufficient detail in clinical batches

Quality aspects in IMP developments 9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Examples – important to include

  • Include relevant parameters that may change during storage

in stability testing (also including appearance and degradation products individually)

  • Justification of specifications for impurities/ degradation

products

  • Information/ results from validation of analytical methods
  • Information on description/ validation for sterilisation by

filtration

  • Information in relation to any dilution of product before use

Quality aspects in IMP developments 10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Quality aspects in IMP developments 11

Thank you for your attention!