Qua Quagga ga Contr Control ol Ef Effor orts ts The Quagga - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

qua quagga ga contr control ol ef effor orts ts the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Qua Quagga ga Contr Control ol Ef Effor orts ts The Quagga - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lak Lake Pir e Piru/Lo u/Lower er Pir Piru C u Creek eek Qua Quagga ga Contr Control ol Ef Effor orts ts The Quagga Mussel: Difficult and Expensive to Eradicate Al All l So Soluti lution ons s Come Come wi with th a Cost


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lak Lake Pir e Piru/Lo u/Lower er Pir Piru C u Creek eek Qua Quagga ga Contr Control

  • l Ef

Effor

  • rts

ts

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Quagga Mussel: Difficult and Expensive to Eradicate

Al All l So Soluti lution

  • ns

s Come Come wi with th a Cost a Cost & Cha & Chall llen enge ge

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Bac Backg kground

  • und & His

& Histor tory- The Stor he Story y of

  • f United

United

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Formed Under Water Conservation Act of 1931
  • Manage Water Resources of Santa Clara River

Watershed and Associated Aquifers

  • Facilities
  • Santa Felicia Dam & Lake Piru – Capture Winter

Flows for Later Release for Aquifers Recharge

  • Freeman Diversion & Associated Aquifer

Recharge Spreading Grounds

  • Surface Water Delivery Systems to Reduce

Coastal Pumping & Associated Seawater Intrusion

  • Potential Future Recycled Water Distribution
  • Potential Future Seawater Desalination Facility

UNITED PURPOSE & BACKGROUND

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Annual Operating Budget – Approx. $19 Million
  • Majority of Funding via Groundwater

Replenishment Fees

  • Recent Litigation regarding Legal Basis of

District’s Funding Mechanism

  • Water Conservation Act (Statute) Versus Voter

Proposition 218 (Constitution)

  • Appealed to California Supreme Court

UWCD FINANCIAL SETTING

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Approximately $300 Million pending Capital

Improvement Projects requiring funding

  • Significant Infrastructure Replacement &

Rehabilitation Projects

  • Endangered Species Act-Related Projects for

Steelhead Trout Passage at Freeman Diversion

  • Current estimate for Quagga Monitoring & Control

$300,000 per year

FINANCIAL SETTING CONTINUED

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Monitoring, Control & Prevention Efforts: Pre-infestation

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 2008

2008-pr prese esent: nt: Vess essel ins el inspe pection ction and and pr preven ention tion pr prog

  • gram

am

  • Based on Lake Casitas prevention program, required

all boats entering reservoir to be clean, drain and dry

  • 2008-2013 approximately 50,000 boats inspections

were conducted (avg. of 7,500 per year)

  • 2010

2010-20 2013 13: : Ph Physica ysical l mon monitori itoring ng pr prog

  • gram

am

  • Substrates were inspected at random intervals

throughout the year to monitor for settlement & recruitment

UWCD PREVENTION MEASURES: Pre-infestation

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Ed

Educ ucation tion & T & Train aining ing (pr (pre- an and d po post st-inf infes esta tation tion)

  • Provided watercraft inspection and decontamination

training to both UWCD staff and onsite concessions staff

  • Provided visitors with educational handouts & flyers

upon entry (pre & post infestation) and installed prevention signage

  • En

Enfor

  • rce

cemen ment t (La (Lake e Pir Piru par park k ser services of vices offi ficer cers) s)

  • In 2012 the adoption of UWCD Ordinance 15 made it

unlawful to fail to undergo a vessel inspection prior to launching at Lake Piru or to import any fish, mollusk,

  • r crustacean into the waterbody
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Containment, Control & Prevention Efforts: Post-Infestation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Initial Discovery

slide-12
SLIDE 12

UW UWCD CD Con Conta tainmen inment, t, Con Contr trol

  • l &

& Pr Preven ention tion: Pos

  • st-Inf

Infes esta tatio tion

Mussel Discovery: December 2013

  • Monitor and quantify infestation
  • Quantify initial infestation (December 2013-February

2014)

  • Research Lake Piru’s physical and chemical conditions

(December 2013-present)

  • Monitor spread of infestation (substrates & visual

monitoring of lake, creek & river)

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Implement integrated pest management

(IPM) program

  • Use least hazardous tactics first
  • Removal from critical infrastructure via hand

scraping, drying & disposal (more than 10,000 lbs. to date)

  • Tarping to create anoxic conditions (round #1

installed: Aug. –Sept. 2014)

  • Developed and submitted draft Monitoring

& Control Plan to CDFW (Draft #1 in Fall of 2014)

UW UWCD CD Con Conta tainmen inment, t, Con Contr trol

  • l &

& Pr Preven ention tion: Pos

  • st-Inf

Infes esta tatio tion, n, co cont ntinu inued ed

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Recent Efforts: What We Are Doing Now

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Oct

October

  • ber 2015

2015

  • United submitted 2nd draft Quagga Mussel Monitoring &

Control Plan (QMMCP) to CDFW

  • Febr

bruar uary y 2016 2016

  • CDFW provided comments on QMMCP

.

  • Cited non-compliance with CDFW Code 2301 & 2302.
  • Febr

bruar uary-Pr Present esent 2016 2016

  • We are considering modifications to QMMCP (hired

consultant)

  • We are evaluating more extensive control and

containment options

  • April

pril 201 2016

  • United met with CDFW, NMFS, and FERC to discuss
  • ptions for control and containment

United’s More Recent Efforts

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Con Contr trol

  • l &

& Con Conta tainmen inment t Opt Options ions: Wha hat t Is Being Is Being Eva Evalua luate ted? d?

19

  • 1. Modify lake levels
  • Goal is to desiccate mussels by lowering the lake level

periodically

  • 2. Use cone valves to destroy veligers through

turbulence

  • Contracting with Consultant to evaluate
  • 3. Modify outlet works to increase turbulence to

control the spread of live veligers out of Lake Piru

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 4. Modify releases from lake
  • 5. Use Zequanox or another chemical treatment to kill

mussels and veligers

  • Developing application approach and costs
  • Identifying approvals needed to use Zequanox or

another product

  • 6. Monitor Piru Creek and Santa Clara River
  • 7. Analyze & Develop a Lower River Protection Plan

Control & Containment Options, Continued

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MY MY NO NOTES TES

slide-22
SLIDE 22

QUAGGA MUSSEL INFESTATION-RELATED EXPENDITURES 01/01/2014 - 4/21/2015 Monitoring&Planning: Vendors-Contractors Misc./Other Legal Salaries Materials/Goods Permits/Licens es TOTAL United: Admin. $32,932.50 $32,932.50 United: Eng. $9,486.49 $9,486.49 United: EPCD $53,748.94 $349.18 $54,098.12 United: Rec $71,688.25 $71,688.25 United: O&M $791.39 $791.39 Materials/Goods $17,320.26 $17,320.26 Permits $195.00 $195.00 Misc/Other $3,689.98 $3,689.98 Legal $3,022.92 $3,022.92 Subtotal United Departments $ - $3,689.98 $3,022.92 $168,647.57 $8,834.72 $195.00 $184,390.19 UCSB-Carrie Culver $32,400.00 $32,400.00 Eco Marine/ Anghera $26,998.14 $26,998.14 Eco Marine/ Morris $41,845.25 $41,845.25 Cardno ENTRIX $51,840.25 $51,840.25 Subtotal Contractors/Vendors $153,083.64 $ - $ - $ - $ - $

  • $153,083.64

TOTAL EXPENDITURES $153,083.64 $3,689.98 $3,022.92 $168,647.57 $17,699.44 $195.00 $337,473.83

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1.Reducing lake levels could negatively affect Recreation, boat ramps, marina operations, camping and recreational water deliveries

  • Stakeholder notification and consultation
  • Development of a plan for the temporary location of

marina facilities and water treatment barge

  • Consider alternative water supply for recreation

facilities

  • Consider operational adjustments to maintain

minimum levels of recreation

Implications of Options Considered

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 2. Could Trigger Permitting
  • FERC license modification
  • Consultation with NMFS
  • Consultation with USFWS
  • CDFW
  • California Department Of Pesticide Regulation
  • California Regional Water Quality Control Board
  • CEQA
  • NEPA

Implications of Options Considered