Public Scoping Meeting Public Scoping Meeting State Project No. 1 6 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

public scoping meeting public scoping meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public Scoping Meeting Public Scoping Meeting State Project No. 1 6 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public Scoping Meeting Public Scoping Meeting State Project No. 1 6 7 -1 0 8 State Project No. 1 6 7 -1 0 8 Bridge No. 0 0 7 7 3 Bridge No. 0 0 7 7 3 Heroes Tunnel Heroes Tunnel Route 1 5 W ilbur Cross Parkw ay Route 1 5 W ilbur Cross


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Public Scoping Meeting Public Scoping Meeting

State Project No. 1 6 7 -1 0 8

Bridge No. 0 0 7 7 3

Heroes Tunnel

Route 1 5 W ilbur Cross Parkw ay

Through W est Rock Ridge

Tow ns of Ham den, W oodbridge City of New Haven

State Project No. 1 6 7 -1 0 8

Bridge No. 0 0 7 7 3

Heroes Tunnel

Route 1 5 W ilbur Cross Parkw ay

Through W est Rock Ridge

Tow ns of Ham den, W oodbridge City of New Haven

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda Agenda

  • Show Project Location and Lim its
  • Define Public Scoping Meeting
  • Explain the Purpose of the Project
  • I ntroduce CTDOT and Consultant Engineers
  • Present an Overview of the Project
  • Explain the Environm ental Docum ent Process
  • Solicit Questions and Com m ents
  • Show Project Location and Lim its
  • Define Public Scoping Meeting
  • Explain the Purpose of the Project
  • I ntroduce CTDOT and Consultant Engineers
  • Present an Overview of the Project
  • Explain the Environm ental Docum ent Process
  • Solicit Questions and Com m ents
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Location – Map View Project Location – Map View

Exit 5 9

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Location – Aerial View Project Location – Aerial View

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Public Scoping Meeting Public Scoping Meeting

  • Gathering/ Analysis of I nform ation to Establish the

Scope of Environm ental Review

  • Scoping: Prior to Preparing Any Environm ental

Docum ent and Deciding on Project Alternatives

  • Request Public to Subm it I nform ation to I dentify

Alternatives that Fulfill Project Purpose and Need

  • I dentify Specific Aspects of Environm ent to be

Analyzed

  • Public May Have Better Know ledge of Area and

Resources

  • Gathering/ Analysis of I nform ation to Establish the

Scope of Environm ental Review

  • Scoping: Prior to Preparing Any Environm ental

Docum ent and Deciding on Project Alternatives

  • Request Public to Subm it I nform ation to I dentify

Alternatives that Fulfill Project Purpose and Need

  • I dentify Specific Aspects of Environm ent to be

Analyzed

  • Public May Have Better Know ledge of Area and

Resources

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Purpose Of Project Purpose Of Project

  • To correct current overall rating of “Poor” determ ined

by periodic inspections

  • Tunnel is currently inspected on a yearly basis

( biennial and special inspections)

  • Current “Poor” rating not an indication of an im m inent

safety issue, but rather identifies the need for action before a m ore serious condition develops

  • Project scope is anticipated to include rehabilitation

and/ or reconstruction to address structural and geom etric deficiencies.

  • To correct current overall rating of “Poor” determ ined

by periodic inspections

  • Tunnel is currently inspected on a yearly basis

( biennial and special inspections)

  • Current “Poor” rating not an indication of an im m inent

safety issue, but rather identifies the need for action before a m ore serious condition develops

  • Project scope is anticipated to include rehabilitation

and/ or reconstruction to address structural and geom etric deficiencies.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Project Roles Project Roles

CTDOT Office of Environm ental Planning

  • Coordination/ Review of Environm ental Aspects
  • Mark Alexander, Assistant Planning Director
  • Kevin Flem ing, Transportation Planner

CTDOT Division of Bridges, Bridge Consultant Design Unit

  • Oversight/ Liaison/ Coordination of Design Consultant
  • Theodore Nezam es, Manager of Bridges
  • Tim othy Fields, Principal Engineer
  • David Cutler, Supervising Engineer
  • Derick Lessard, Project Engineer

CTDOT Office of Environm ental Planning

  • Coordination/ Review of Environm ental Aspects
  • Mark Alexander, Assistant Planning Director
  • Kevin Flem ing, Transportation Planner

CTDOT Division of Bridges, Bridge Consultant Design Unit

  • Oversight/ Liaison/ Coordination of Design Consultant
  • Theodore Nezam es, Manager of Bridges
  • Tim othy Fields, Principal Engineer
  • David Cutler, Supervising Engineer
  • Derick Lessard, Project Engineer
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Project Roles Project Roles

CDM Sm ith

  • Design Consultant Engineer
  • Preparing Environm ental I m pact Evaluation/ Assessm ent
  • Prelim inary Design of Preferred Alternative

Federal Highw ay Adm inistration ( FHW A)

  • Federal Funding Anticipated for Alternative
  • FHW A Engineers w ill be Associated w ith Project

CDM Sm ith

  • Design Consultant Engineer
  • Preparing Environm ental I m pact Evaluation/ Assessm ent
  • Prelim inary Design of Preferred Alternative

Federal Highw ay Adm inistration ( FHW A)

  • Federal Funding Anticipated for Alternative
  • FHW A Engineers w ill be Associated w ith Project
slide-9
SLIDE 9

CDM Sm ith CDM Sm ith

  • New England-Based Global Consulting Engineering Firm
  • Offices in East Hartford and New Haven ( Church Street)
  • I nternational Tunnel Experts Supporting Local

Offices/ Project

  • I nspection of Tunnels, Preparation of Reports
  • Know Project, Environs, and Com m unity
  • New England-Based Global Consulting Engineering Firm
  • Offices in East Hartford and New Haven ( Church Street)
  • I nternational Tunnel Experts Supporting Local

Offices/ Project

  • I nspection of Tunnels, Preparation of Reports
  • Know Project, Environs, and Com m unity
slide-10
SLIDE 10

CDM Sm ith Team CDM Sm ith Team

  • Principal – Larry Murphy
  • Principal in Charge – Paul Schm idt
  • Principal/ Project Manager – Joe Balskus
  • Public Engagem ent – Dave Sousa
  • Environm ental Assessm ent/ I m pact – Jane W heeler
  • Tunnel Designer – Moham m ad Jafari
  • Principal – Larry Murphy
  • Principal in Charge – Paul Schm idt
  • Principal/ Project Manager – Joe Balskus
  • Public Engagem ent – Dave Sousa
  • Environm ental Assessm ent/ I m pact – Jane W heeler
  • Tunnel Designer – Moham m ad Jafari
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Tunnel Description Tunnel Description

  • Opened in 1 9 4 9 - W ilbur Cross Parkw ay
  • Eligible for Listing on State/ National Historic Register
  • Only Highw ay Tunnel Through Natural Land Form in CT
  • Carries 7 0 ,0 0 0 vehicle per day
  • Each Barrel 1 2 0 0 ’ long, 2 8 ’ w ide, 1 1 ’ Lanes, 6 ” shoulders
  • Standards Require 1 2 ’ Lanes, 8 ’ Shoulders
  • Non-Com pliance w / Tunnel Standards/ Requirem ents
  • Geom etrics, Ventilation and Em ergency System s
  • CDM Sm ith 2 0 0 9 I nspection: Need for Rehabilitation
  • Opened in 1 9 4 9 - W ilbur Cross Parkw ay
  • Eligible for Listing on State/ National Historic Register
  • Only Highw ay Tunnel Through Natural Land Form in CT
  • Carries 7 0 ,0 0 0 vehicle per day
  • Each Barrel 1 2 0 0 ’ long, 2 8 ’ w ide, 1 1 ’ Lanes, 6 ” shoulders
  • Standards Require 1 2 ’ Lanes, 8 ’ Shoulders
  • Non-Com pliance w / Tunnel Standards/ Requirem ents
  • Geom etrics, Ventilation and Em ergency System s
  • CDM Sm ith 2 0 0 9 I nspection: Need for Rehabilitation
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Existing Conditions Existing Conditions

  • Significant Deterioration
  • Prior Biennial Reports
  • CDM Sm ith I nspection/ Study
  • Peak Hour Congestion
  • Recurring Bottlenecks
  • Em ergency Response

Constraints

  • Fire Safety System - None
  • Significant Deterioration
  • Prior Biennial Reports
  • CDM Sm ith I nspection/ Study
  • Peak Hour Congestion
  • Recurring Bottlenecks
  • Em ergency Response

Constraints

  • Fire Safety System - None
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Tunnels Tunnels

  • Ground W ater I nfiltration
  • W alls/ Ceiling - Stalagm ites
  • Freeze/ Thaw Conditions
  • Falling I cicles
  • Cross Section Deficient
  • 2 6 ’ Existing W idth
  • 5 0 ’ Required ( 2 Lanes)
  • Frequent Maintenance Requires Tunnel

Closures – Shifting Traffic

  • Ground W ater I nfiltration
  • W alls/ Ceiling - Stalagm ites
  • Freeze/ Thaw Conditions
  • Falling I cicles
  • Cross Section Deficient
  • 2 6 ’ Existing W idth
  • 5 0 ’ Required ( 2 Lanes)
  • Frequent Maintenance Requires Tunnel

Closures – Shifting Traffic

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tunnel W alls Tunnel W alls

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tunnel W alls Tunnel W alls

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tunnel Ceiling Tunnel Ceiling

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tunnel Ceiling Tunnel Ceiling

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Tunnel Ceiling Tunnel Ceiling

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Tunnel W alls Tunnel W alls

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Tunnel Cross Section Tunnel Cross Section

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Tunnel Cross Section Tunnel Cross Section

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Rehabilitation or Reconstruction Rehabilitation or Reconstruction

  • Rehabilitation of Tunnel Evaluated in 2 0 1 4

Report

  • Significant Traffic I m pacts During Lane Closures
  • Geom etrics Not Correctable W ithin Existing Tunnel

W idths

  • Vehicle Speeds Through Tunnel I m pacted
  • Narrow ness of Tunnel Causes Reduced Speeds
  • Structural I ntegrity of Tunnels – Ground W ater

I nfiltration

  • Rehabilitation of Tunnel Evaluated in 2 0 1 4

Report

  • Significant Traffic I m pacts During Lane Closures
  • Geom etrics Not Correctable W ithin Existing Tunnel

W idths

  • Vehicle Speeds Through Tunnel I m pacted
  • Narrow ness of Tunnel Causes Reduced Speeds
  • Structural I ntegrity of Tunnels – Ground W ater

I nfiltration

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Rehabilitation or Reconstruction Rehabilitation or Reconstruction

  • Rehabilitation Lim its Benefits of Tunnels
  • Future Service Life
  • Future Traffic Flow Capacity
  • Reconstruction Options Considered
  • Rehabilitation Lim its Benefits of Tunnels
  • Future Service Life
  • Future Traffic Flow Capacity
  • Reconstruction Options Considered
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Rehabilitation Reports Sum m ary Rehabilitation Reports Sum m ary

  • Novem ber 2 0 1 4 Alternative

Construction Options Study

  • Septem ber 2 0 1 6 Supplem ent
  • Studied Several Options
  • New One-Lane Tunnel
  • New Tw o-Lane Tunnel
  • W iden Existing Tunnel
  • Close One Existing Tunnel/ Detour
  • Close One Lane in Existing Tunnel
  • Construction Bypass Tunnel ( short)
  • Construction Bypass Tunnel ( long)
  • Additional Options to be

Explored

  • No Build ( Do Nothing)
  • Novem ber 2 0 1 4 Alternative

Construction Options Study

  • Septem ber 2 0 1 6 Supplem ent
  • Studied Several Options
  • New One-Lane Tunnel
  • New Tw o-Lane Tunnel
  • W iden Existing Tunnel
  • Close One Existing Tunnel/ Detour
  • Close One Lane in Existing Tunnel
  • Construction Bypass Tunnel ( short)
  • Construction Bypass Tunnel ( long)
  • Additional Options to be

Explored

  • No Build ( Do Nothing)
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Existing Environm ental Resources Existing Environm ental Resources

Natural Diversity Area Forested W oodland W intergreen Brook Nature Center

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Environm ental Docum ent/ Process Environm ental Docum ent/ Process

  • Prepare Environm ental Docum ent
  • Alternative Analysis I ncluding No Build
  • National/ Connecticut Environm ental Policy Acts

NEPA/ CEPA Processes

  • Potential Environm ental I m pacts of All

Alternatives

  • W est Rock Nature Center/ W est Rock Ridge State

Park

  • Public Outreach
  • Prelim inary Design
  • Preferred Alternative
  • Construction Staging
  • I m pacts
  • Prepare Environm ental Docum ent
  • Alternative Analysis I ncluding No Build
  • National/ Connecticut Environm ental Policy Acts

NEPA/ CEPA Processes

  • Potential Environm ental I m pacts of All

Alternatives

  • W est Rock Nature Center/ W est Rock Ridge State

Park

  • Public Outreach
  • Prelim inary Design
  • Preferred Alternative
  • Construction Staging
  • I m pacts
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Environm ental NEPA/ CEPA Tasks Environm ental NEPA/ CEPA Tasks

  • Prepare Environm ental I m pact Evaluation

( EI E) / Environm ental Assessm ent ( EA)

  • Establish Purpose and Need
  • Evaluate Alternatives
  • Consider Construction/ Post-Construction

I m pacts

  • Conduct Field Studies
  • Consider Sensitive Resources:

– W est Rock Nature Center ( City) – W intergreen Brook – W est Rock Ridge State Park – Historic Designation

  • Prepare Environm ental I m pact Evaluation

( EI E) / Environm ental Assessm ent ( EA)

  • Establish Purpose and Need
  • Evaluate Alternatives
  • Consider Construction/ Post-Construction

I m pacts

  • Conduct Field Studies
  • Consider Sensitive Resources:

– W est Rock Nature Center ( City) – W intergreen Brook – W est Rock Ridge State Park – Historic Designation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Environm ental NEPA/ CEPA Environm ental NEPA/ CEPA

  • Air quality
  • W ater quality
  • Noise
  • Groundw ater
  • W etlands, w ater bodies and

floodplains

  • Cultural/ Archaeological

resources

  • Recreational Resources
  • Natural com m unities, including

protected anim al, plant species and their habitats

  • Aesthetics
  • Traffic
  • Air quality
  • W ater quality
  • Noise
  • Groundw ater
  • W etlands, w ater bodies and

floodplains

  • Cultural/ Archaeological

resources

  • Recreational Resources
  • Natural com m unities, including

protected anim al, plant species and their habitats

  • Aesthetics
  • Traffic
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Public I nvolvem ent – Support Process Public I nvolvem ent – Support Process

I ncludes:

  • Com m unity Advisory Com m ittee
  • I dentification and Engagem ent of

Stakeholders

  • Project W ebsite and Social Media
  • Em ail Bulletins to I nterested

Citizens and Com m unity Groups

I ncludes:

  • Com m unity Advisory Com m ittee
  • I dentification and Engagem ent of

Stakeholders

  • Project W ebsite and Social Media
  • Em ail Bulletins to I nterested

Citizens and Com m unity Groups

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Public I nvolvem ent Public I nvolvem ent

I ncludes Various Meetings:

  • Outreach Events ( Pop-Ups)
  • I nform ational Meetings or

Open Houses

  • Form al Public Meeting( s)

I ncludes Various Meetings:

  • Outreach Events ( Pop-Ups)
  • I nform ational Meetings or

Open Houses

  • Form al Public Meeting( s)
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Potential Stakeholders – Public Outreach Potential Stakeholders – Public Outreach

Large Em ployers/ Business Orgs:

  • Southern CT State University
  • Sikorsky
  • Yale University
  • Greater New Haven Cham ber of

Com m erce

  • REX Regional Econom ic Xcelleration
  • Yale-New Haven Hospital

Large Em ployers/ Business Orgs:

  • Southern CT State University
  • Sikorsky
  • Yale University
  • Greater New Haven Cham ber of

Com m erce

  • REX Regional Econom ic Xcelleration
  • Yale-New Haven Hospital

Governm ental:

  • Elected Officials ( Local, State &

Federal)

  • South Central Council of Gov’ts
  • CT Dept. of Energy & Environm ental

Protection

  • Federal Highw ay Adm inistration
  • U.S. Environm ental Protection Agency

Governm ental:

  • Elected Officials ( Local, State &

Federal)

  • South Central Council of Gov’ts
  • CT Dept. of Energy & Environm ental

Protection

  • Federal Highw ay Adm inistration
  • U.S. Environm ental Protection Agency

Non-Profit Orgs:

  • CT Association for

Com m unity Transportation

  • AAA of Southern New

England

  • CT Coalition for

Environm ental Justice

  • CT Fund for the

Environm ent

  • Econom ic Developm ent
  • Corp. of New Haven
  • CT Technology Council
  • New Haven Urban Design

League

  • Elm City Cycling
  • CT Business & I ndustry

Association

Non-Profit Orgs:

  • CT Association for

Com m unity Transportation

  • AAA of Southern New

England

  • CT Coalition for

Environm ental Justice

  • CT Fund for the

Environm ent

  • Econom ic Developm ent
  • Corp. of New Haven
  • CT Technology Council
  • New Haven Urban Design

League

  • Elm City Cycling
  • CT Business & I ndustry

Association

Municipalities:

  • Tow n of W oodbridge
  • Tow n of Ham den
  • City of New Haven

Municipalities:

  • Tow n of W oodbridge
  • Tow n of Ham den
  • City of New Haven

Transportation Providers:

  • CT Transit
  • Greater New

Haven Transit District

  • CT Rides
  • CTDOT

Transportation Providers:

  • CT Transit
  • Greater New

Haven Transit District

  • CT Rides
  • CTDOT
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Next Steps Next Steps

  • Receive Public Com m ents
  • Verbal, W ritten Form , Em ail
  • Early W ork – Data Collection
  • Archaeological Survey
  • Geotechnical ( Borings)
  • Survey
  • NEPA Docum ent Studies
  • Prelim inary Design – Alternative
  • Receive Public Com m ents
  • Verbal, W ritten Form , Em ail
  • Early W ork – Data Collection
  • Archaeological Survey
  • Geotechnical ( Borings)
  • Survey
  • NEPA Docum ent Studies
  • Prelim inary Design – Alternative
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Tim e Line Tim e Line

  • Early W ork – Next 6 -9 Months
  • Com plete NEPA Docum ent Studies
  • 1 8 -2 4 m onths
  • Prelim inary Design – Preferred Alternative
  • After NEPA
  • Early W ork – Next 6 -9 Months
  • Com plete NEPA Docum ent Studies
  • 1 8 -2 4 m onths
  • Prelim inary Design – Preferred Alternative
  • After NEPA
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Questions/ Com m ents Questions/ Com m ents

  • End of Scoping Process Com m ent Period –

October 7 , 2 0 1 6

  • Com m ents Throughout Project Process
  • Presentation Copy W ill Be Available:

http:/ / w w w .ct.gov/ dot/ lib/ dot/ docum ents/ 0 1 6 7 - 0 1 0 8 ScopingMeeting

  • Project Contacts
  • End of Scoping Process Com m ent Period –

October 7 , 2 0 1 6

  • Com m ents Throughout Project Process
  • Presentation Copy W ill Be Available:

http:/ / w w w .ct.gov/ dot/ lib/ dot/ docum ents/ 0 1 6 7 - 0 1 0 8 ScopingMeeting

  • Project Contacts
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Contacts Contacts

Public Scoping Com m ents by October 7 , 2 0 1 6 to:

  • Mr. Mark W . Alexander, Transportation Assistant Planning Director

Connecticut Departm ent of Transportation Bureau of Policy and Planning 2 8 0 0 Berlin Turnpike, New ington, CT 0 6 1 3 1 dot.environm entalplanning@ct.gov

Project Com m ents throughout process should be sent to:

  • Mr. David A. Cutler, P.E., Transportation Supervising Engineer

Connecticut Departm ent of Transportation Bureau of Engineering and Construction 2 8 0 0 Berlin Turnpike, New ington, CT 0 6 1 3 1 8 6 0 -5 9 4 -3 2 1 0

David.Cutler@ct.gov

Public Scoping Com m ents by October 7 , 2 0 1 6 to:

  • Mr. Mark W . Alexander, Transportation Assistant Planning Director

Connecticut Departm ent of Transportation Bureau of Policy and Planning 2 8 0 0 Berlin Turnpike, New ington, CT 0 6 1 3 1 dot.environm entalplanning@ct.gov

Project Com m ents throughout process should be sent to:

  • Mr. David A. Cutler, P.E., Transportation Supervising Engineer

Connecticut Departm ent of Transportation Bureau of Engineering and Construction 2 8 0 0 Berlin Turnpike, New ington, CT 0 6 1 3 1 8 6 0 -5 9 4 -3 2 1 0

David.Cutler@ct.gov

slide-36
SLIDE 36

End of Presentation End of Presentation

http:/ / w w w .ct.gov/ dot/ lib/ dot/ docum ents / 0 1 6 7 -0 1 0 8 ScopingMeeting

Thank You!

http:/ / w w w .ct.gov/ dot/ lib/ dot/ docum ents / 0 1 6 7 -0 1 0 8 ScopingMeeting

Thank You!