Public consultation results for Ex-Post Evaluation of Christian - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
public consultation results for ex post evaluation of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public consultation results for Ex-Post Evaluation of Christian - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 14, 2023 109 likes •357 views

Public consultation results for Ex-Post Evaluation of Christian Walther Bruun, Policy Analyst DG RTD.A5 - Evaluation Agenda About the consultation Overall feedbacks, key achievements and shortcomings The impacts of FP7 ERA

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Christian Walther Bruun, Policy Analyst DG RTD.A5 - Evaluation

Public consultation results for Ex-Post Evaluation of

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Policy Research and Innovation

  • About the consultation
  • Overall feedbacks, key achievements and

shortcomings

  • The impacts of FP7
  • ERA and EU Added Value
  • Conclusions

Agenda

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Policy Research and Innovation

About the consultation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Policy Research and Innovation

  • Results feeding into the overall Ex-Post Evaluation
  • Open February-May 2015

Public Stakeholder Consultation: Have your say on the achievements of FP7

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Policy Research and Innovation

Responses

  • 202 responses
  • 88 (44%) higher education and public research
  • rganisations
  • 70 (35%) individuals
  • 20 (14%) private sector
  • 17 (8,4%) ministries and agencies
  • 7 (3,5%) SMEs

Additional written contributions received separately from some stakeholder organisations

HES & REC PRC SME

PUB

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Policy Research and Innovation

Overall feedbacks, key achievements and shortcomings

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Policy Research and Innovation

Key achievements/strengths of FP7

Creating ERA through cooperation and competition European Research Council (ERC)/IDEAS Joint Agenda-setting Marie Curie Actions/PEOPLE Specific Programme

HES & REC PRC SME

PUB

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Policy Research and Innovation

Shortcomings in FP7

  • Administrative burden high and financial and

legal rules cumbersome

  • High over-subscription
  • Societal impact not addressed to a sufficient

extent

  • Too narrow topics and too limited call scopes
  • Industry participation neglected: FP7 did not

enhance industry participation enough

  • Difficult to enter for newcomers
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Policy Research and Innovation

6% 27% 50% 17% 0% 0% 18% 53% 29% 0% 0% 6% 80% 13% 2% 0% 15% 75% 0% 10% 14% 0% 57% 29% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Very dissatisfied Moderately dissatisfied Satisfied Very satisfied Don't know Individual Ministries and Funding agencies Organisation HES and REC Organisation Private Organisation SME

Overall are you satisfied with FP7?

93%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Policy Research and Innovation

Has the implementation of FP7 been effective?

3% 11% 57% 29% 71% 29% 3% 70% 26% 5% 10% 80% 5% 14% 57% 29% 2% 6% 66% 25% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% No Generally no, although with some successes Generally yes, but with some problems Yes Individual Ministries and Funding agencies Organisation HES and REC Organisation Private Organisation SME Overall 92%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Policy Research and Innovation

The impacts of FP7

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Policy Research and Innovation

To what extent did FP7 research activities produce enduring impact?

83%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Policy Research and Innovation

Impact in 4 Specific Programmes

Impacts

Societal Economic Regional On Scientific Excellence Technologic al or social innovations

Environmental

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Policy Research and Innovation

COOPERATION

P.C. 70%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Policy Research and Innovation

IDEAS

P.C. 65%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Policy Research and Innovation

PEOPLE

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Policy Research and Innovation

CAPACITIES

9,6 35,0 45,5 50,4 58,5 70,9 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 Environmental impact Societal impact Economic impact Regional impact Impact on scientific excellence Impact on Technological or social innovations

All institutions, % find programme to generate most impact in area…

P.C. 79%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Policy Research and Innovation

Most important?

Impacts

Societal

Economic

Regional

On Scientific Excellence Technological or social innovations

Envi ron men tal

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Policy Research and Innovation

59,9% 36,9% 30,9% 29,8% 27,7% 20,2% 19,5% 13,0% 12,6% 10,1% 9,4% 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00%

All institutions, % find this simplification measure generated most impact...

SIMPLIFICATION

SME 54%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Policy Research and Innovation

ERA and EU Added Value

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Policy Research and Innovation

ERA

SME 89% M&A 0%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Policy Research and Innovation

In which of the dimensions of EU added-value has FP7 been most successful?

  • 1. Tackling pan-European challenges
  • 2. Increase competition in research
  • 3. Enhance researchers’

’ ’ ’ mobility

By bringing additional public support and fostering critical mass for ambitious but risky research programmes, FP7 has addressed market failures and reduction of technical and business risks."

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Policy Research and Innovation

Conclusions

+ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷

  • Overall satisfaction

good

  • EU Added Value
  • Boosting Excellence
  • Contributed to

creating ERA

  • Efforts to create

vibrant innovation ecosystem

  • Administration
  • Narrow calls and
  • versubscription
  • Not enough focus on

societal impact and industry participation

  • High entry-barriers
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Policy Research and Innovation

  • Thank you for your contributions
  • Christian Walther Bruun
  • Christian-Walther.BRUUN@ec.europa.eu