PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR MISSION BAY www.ucsf.edu/LRDP 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
proposed transportation plan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR MISSION BAY www.ucsf.edu/LRDP 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 23, 2023 251 likes •462 views

LRDP PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR MISSION BAY www.ucsf.edu/LRDP 1 VEHICLE DEMAND Despite the proposed increase of 991,800 GSF and number of people, the Proposed Physical Plan will not increase the number of daily or PM peak hour

slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.ucsf.edu/LRDP

LRDP PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR MISSION BAY

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Despite the proposed increase of 991,800 GSF and

number of people, the Proposed Physical Plan will not increase the number of daily or PM peak hour vehicle trips beyond what was projected in the 1996 LRDP or 2002 LRDP Amendment

VEHICLE DEMAND

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Identify potential impacts of

proposed plan on the transportation system in the vicinity of Mission Bay

  • Develop and analyze

transportation measures to mitigate significant impacts, if identified

OBJECTIVES

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ENTITLEMENT

Existing plus Building 25A Remaining & Proposed New Entitlement Proposed Physical Plan

Gross square feet 2,186,300 1,455,500 3,641,800 Residential units 431 523 954 Daily staff and visitor population 6,740 5,310 12,050 Daily vehicles 3,980 2,560 6,540 PM peak hour vehicles 670 480 1,150 PM peak hour transit riders* 880 690 1,570 * Includes trips on UCSF and Transportation Management Association bus shuttle services

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

DAILY VEHICLES

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PM PEAK HOUR VEHICLES

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MODAL SPLIT

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 15 intersections
  • Focused on weekday PM

peak hour LOS* analysis

  • Analysis Scenarios:

– Existing – Proposed Physical Plan – Proposed Physical Plan with I-280 ramps improvements – Year 2040 Cumulative * Level of service = quantitative measure of traffic congestion

CURRENT STUDY INTERSECTIONS

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Existing Conditions Study Intersections

Level of Service Delays A,B = Minimal (less than 20 seconds) C,D = Tolerable (20 to 55 seconds) E,F = Significant (over 55 seconds)

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Proposed Physical Plan Existing Conditions

Level of Service Delays A,B = Minimal (less than 20 seconds) C,D = Tolerable (20 to 55 seconds) E,F = Significant (over 55 seconds)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Proposed Physical Plan + I-280 Improvements Proposed Physical Plan

Level of Service Delays A,B = Minimal (less than 20 seconds) C,D = Tolerable (20 to 55 seconds) E,F = Significant (over 55 seconds)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Land Use

– Eastern Neighborhoods – Central Corridor – Piers 30/32 – MB South Residential – Kaiser Medical Office – Seawall Lot 337 – Pier 70

  • Infrastructure

– Muni Transit Effectiveness Project – Caltrain electrification

ADJACENT PROJECTS

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Year 2040 Cumulative Proposed Physical Plan + I-280 Improvements

Level of Service Delays A,B = Minimal (less than 20 seconds) C,D = Tolerable (20 to 55 seconds) E,F = Significant (over 55 seconds)

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Expected traffic conditions are consistent with previous

analyses conducted for Mission Bay

– Mission Bay SEIR – UCSF 1996 LRDP and its amendments

  • Intersections on King Street would operate at LOS E or

F in the year 2040 even without UCSF’s proposed additional entitlement

YEAR 2040 CUMULATIVE

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TRANSIT DEMAND

Transit Demand Weekday PM Peak Hour

Service Existing plus Building 25A Remaining & Proposed New Entitlement Proposed Physical Plan UCSF Shuttle 455 390 845 Regional/Local Transit 425 300 725 Total 880 690 1,570

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FUTURE UCSF SHUTTLE SERVICE

Shuttle Projections

UCSF is likely to require the following shuttle runs accessing Mission Bay to accommodate planned growth at the campus:

  • 8 additional shuttle trips (6% increase over existing*) between 2015 and

2020 after the new Mission Bay Medical Center is operational and Moffitt Long Hospital has been fully back-filled

  • Another 16 shuttle trips (9% increase over existing*) by 2035 with full

development of the Mission Bay campus north of Sixteenth Street

  • This translates into up to 4 additional Mission Bay shuttle vehicles in

service at any time through 2035 *An additional 24 shuttle trips per day have been recommended for current

  • perations to address peak period needs and a new policy to disallow

standees.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.ucsf.edu/LRDP

COORDINATION WITH SAN FRANCISCO “CITY FAMILY”

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

www.ucsf.edu/LRDP

Coordination with San Francisco “City Family”

  • Information on emerging LRDP proposals is being shared

with the San Francisco “City Family”

  • Transportation analysis methodology and findings shared

and discussed

  • Infrastructure analysis also shared and discussed:

– No upgrades to public infrastructure needed for stormwater, sanitary sewer, high pressure water, domestic water, reclaimed water, telecom, electricity and natural gas – City may require upgrades to pumps and breaker switches in Sewer Pump Station “P15” (immediately north of Diller Cancer Research Building). Discussions with San Francisco Public Utilities Commission underway.

  • Working group to coordinate the preparation of UCSF’s

LRDP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) with the City’s activities has been established and is meeting regularly

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

www.ucsf.edu/LRDP

TOPICAL DISCUSSION GROUPS

  • A. LRDP/Mission Bay Urban Design
  • B. LRDP/Mission Bay Transportation

20