Proposed Direct Transfer Coal Facility
May 30, 2013
w w w.f s d . b c . c a
1
Proposed Direct Transfer Coal Facility May 30, 2013 w w w.f s d . b - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Proposed Direct Transfer Coal Facility May 30, 2013 w w w.f s d . b c . c a 1 FSD Background Fraser Surrey Docks has been an integral and responsible part of the community for 50 years The economic downturn in 2008 was tough on our
1
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
2
years
expand to provide additional benefit to the community through jobs, taxes and supporting local business
expand
possible adverse impact on our community and stakeholders
existing deep sea marine terminal with existing infrastructure such as FSD, to capitalize
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
3
terminal operations
(i) receive full unit trains of coal that have been profiled and covered with a surfactant (ii) unload coal from bottom dump rail cars into fully enclosed shallow pits (iii) directly transfer coal via enclosed conveyance system to waiting barges (iv) not store coal on site during normal operations
unloading of a unit train onto two 8,000 DWT barges in one regular shift
loaded onto deep sea vessels
Phase 1 INFORM & NOTIFY
neighbours in Surrey, Delta and New Westminster
government briefings
residents and resident groups, municipalities, First Nations, and other stakeholders RECEIVE FEEDBACK & ADDRESS CONCERNS
residents and resident groups, municipalities, First Nations, and other stakeholders
mitigation measures as necessary to address community concerns Phase 2 CLARIFY SCOPE & MITIGATIONS
attend
measures address the feedback received
feedback and consideration
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
4
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
Feedback received expressed concerns in six key areas:
5
experts and our partners to address these concerns with mitigation measures
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
6
stabilizer that has proven through operations to reduce dust by 85%
Template, which requires smoothing of the coal such that it is more aerodynamic and less susceptible to loss from wind
coal dust prior to the return journey
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
7
height to barge surface and reduce turbulence
eliminate the need for an emergency stockpile
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
8
easily and create dust
an increased dust risk
conditions
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
9
coal drop will be 3 feet or less and with the enclosure around the pits the noise will be minimized
move cars through the facility at a consistent speed to avoid any noisy shunting
12 degrees or less to minimize noise caused by steel railcar wheels pulling on steel track when turns are tighter
regarding train whistle noise
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
10
coal barge movements and it was concluded that proposed barge movements present no new risks
conditions
the required Transport Canada regulations and be equipped with fire suppression
characteristics to ensure proper match
damage can be maintained and barge remains afloat
spill
and have been operating barges in the river for over 20 years
F R A S E R S U R R E Y D O C K S
11
become incorporated into the terminal’s SOP and SWP
Response Plan (in conjunction with CoS FD, rail and marine operators) – Human Safety, Containment, Assessment, Cleanup and Resumption
(hose) taps and valves
fire resistant belting
w w w . f s d . b c . c a
12