properties of the qgp with hard probes
play

Properties of the QGP with hard probes Oliver Busch for the ALICE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Properties of the QGP with hard probes Oliver Busch for the ALICE collaboration 1 Oliver Busch TGSW 2016 /09/17 Outline introduction jet azimuthal anisotropy jet shapes 2 Oliver Busch TGSW 2016 /09/17 Introduction 3


  1. Properties of the QGP with hard probes Oliver Busch for the ALICE collaboration 1 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

  2. Outline • introduction • jet azimuthal anisotropy • jet shapes 2 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

  3. Introduction 3 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

  4. Jets: seeing quarks and gluons • jet: collimated bunch of hadrons • quasi-free parton scattering at high Q 2 : the best available experimental equivalent to quarks and gluons 4 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

  5. Jet fragmentation • initial hard scattering: high-p T partons • cascade of (anti-)quarks and gluons: parton shower • at soft scale (O( Λ QCD )): hadronization 5 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

  6. QCD phase transition • in heavy-ion collisions at ultra-relativistic energies, a quasi macroscopic fireball of hot, strongly interacting matter in local thermal equilibrium is created • lattice QCD predicts phase transition to deconfined, HotQCD, PRD 90, 094503 chirally symmetric matter • energy density from the lattice: rapid increase around T C , indicating increase of degrees of freedom (pion gas -> quarks and gluons) • T C = 154 +/- 9 MeV ε C = 340 +/- 45 MeV/fm 3

  7. Partons in heavy-ion collisions • hard partons are produced early and traverse the hot and dense QGP • expect enhanced parton energy loss: ‘jet quenching’ (mostly) due to medium-induced gluon radiation • ‘vacuum’ expectation calculable by pQCD : ‘calibrated probe of QGP’ • jets sensitive to properties of the medium (energy density, , mean free path, coupling ... ) • ... but also jet-medium interaction not trivial (strong / weak coupling, parton mass / type, fireball dynamics ...) JET collaboration, arXiv: 1312.5003 7

  8. LHC aerial view 8

  9. Jets at ALICE (LHC run 1) • charged particle tracking: - Inner Tracking System (ITS) - Time Projection Chamber - full azimuth, | η |< 0.9 p T > 150 MeV/c • EMCal : - neutral particles - Δφ = 107°, | η |<0.7 cluster E T > 300 MeV • jet trigger with EMCal and TRD • ‘charged’ (tracking) jets and ‘full’ jets • full jets from charged particle tracking and EM energy: conceptually different and complementary to traditional approach 9

  10. Underlying event in heavy-ion collisions • jet reconstruction in heavy-ion collisions : difficult due to the high underlying event background not related to hard scattering • correct spectra for background fluctuations and detector effects via unfolding • not possible down to lowest jet p T jet area ~ 0.5 (R = 0.4) central peripheral

  11. Jet nuclear modification factor • strong suppression observed, similar to hadron RAA → parton energy not recovered inside jet cone Phys.Lett. B746 (2015) 1 • increase of suppression JEWEL: PLB 735 (2014) with centrality YaJEM:PRC 88 (2013) 014905 • weak p T dependence • JEWEL and YaJEM jet quenching models reproduce suppression

  12. Jet azimuthal anisotropy Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 12

  13. Reaction plane dependence • different medium thickness in- and out-of plane • sensitive to path length dependence of jet quenching: pQCD radiative E-loss : ~L 2 collisional E-loss : ~L strong coupling (ADS/CFT) : ~L 3 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 13

  14. Jet v 2 : results • quantify azimuthal asymmetry via 2 nd Fourier harmonic v 2ch jet • central collisions: 1.5 - 2 sigma from v 2ch jet = 0 → consistent with 0, but maybe hint for effect of initial density fluctuations ? • non-zero v 2ch jet in semi-central collisions |>0.9 } |>0.9 } ALICE ALICE ch jet ch jet v 30-50%, Stat unc. v 0-5%, Stat unc. 2 2 0.2 0.2 Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV Syst unc. (shape) Syst unc. (shape) NN NN η η Syst (correlated) = 0.2 anti- , | |<0.7 R = 0.2 anti- k , | |<0.7 R k η ∆ Syst (correlated) η ∆ T T jet jet {EP, | {EP, | Syst unc. (correlated) Syst unc. (correlated) ch jet 0.1 ch jet 0.1 2 2 v v 0 0 (a) (b) p > 0.15 GeV/ c , p > 3 GeV/ c p > 0.15 GeV/ c , p > 3 GeV/ c T, track T, lead T, track T, lead 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ch jet ch jet p (GeV/ c ) p (GeV/ c ) T T Phys. Lett. B753 (2016) 511 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 14

  15. Comparison to previous results • ALICE + CMS single particles, ATLAS full jets : different energy scales ! • non-zero v2 up to high p T CMS, PRL 109 (2012) 022 ATLAS, PRL 111 (2013) 152 ALICE, Phys. Lett. B753 (2016) 511 ALICE, Phys. Lett. B719 (2013) 18 jet jet 2 ALICE 2 ALICE ch jet v v 0-5%, Stat unc. ch jet 0.3 v 30-50%, Stat unc. v 2 0.3 Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV , 2 Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV , NN Syst unc. (shape) NN part Syst unc. (shape) R = 0.2 anti- k , | η |<0.7 part R = 0.2 anti- k , | |<0.7 η T jet T Syst unc. (correlated) jet Syst unc. (correlated) 2 2 v calo jet ATLAS 5-10% v calo jet v ATLAS v 30-50% 2 2 0.2 0.2 part part CMS v {| ∆ η |>3} 0-10% CMS v {| |>3} 30-50% ∆ η 2 2 part part ALICE v {| ∆ η |>2} 0-5% ALICE v {| ∆ η |>2} 30-50% 2 2 0.1 0.1 0 0 p > 0.15 GeV/ c , p > 3 GeV/ c p > 0.15 GeV/ c , p > 3 GeV/ c (b) (a) T, track T, lead T, track T, lead 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 part jet , (GeV/ ) part jet p p c p , p (GeV/ c ) T T T T Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 15

  16. Comparison to JEWEL • in semi-central collisions, good agreement with JEWEL (collisional + ‘pQCD’ radiative energy loss) • clear indication of path-length dependence of energy loss ch jet ch jet ALICE ch jet ALICE v 30-50%, JEWEL ch jet v 0-5%, JEWEL 2 2 2 2 0.2 0.2 ch jet v ch jet v v 30-50%, Stat unc. Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV v 0-5%, Stat unc. Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV 2 NN 2 NN R = 0.2 anti- k , | |<0.7 R = 0.2 anti- k , | |<0.7 η Syst unc. (shape) η T Syst unc. (shape) T jet jet Syst unc. (correlated) Syst unc. (correlated) 0.1 0.1 0 0 (a) (b) lead p > 0.15 GeV/ c , p > 3 GeV/ c lead p > 0.15 GeV/ c , p > 3 GeV/ c T, track T T, track T 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ch jet p (GeV/ c ) ch jet p (GeV/ c ) T T Phys. Lett. B753 (2016) 511 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 16

  17. Jet Shapes Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 17

  18. Jet shapes • radial moment ‘girth’ g, longitudinal dispersion p T D, difference leading - subleading p T LeSub • shapes in Pb-Pb as probe of quenching of low-p T jets: characterise fragment distributions and are sensitive to medium induced changes of intra-jet momentum flow • ‘event-by-event’ measure, sensitive to fluctuations Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 18

  19. Jet shapes in Pb-Pb • fully corrected to charged particle level • compare to PYTHIA reference, validated with results from pp collisions at 7 TeV → • g shifted to smaller values indicates more collimated jet core 30 g ALICE Preliminary dN/d Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV NN 25 Anti- k charged jets, R = 0.2 T ALICE Data jet,ch jets 40 < p < 60 GeV/ c Shape uncertainty T 20 1/N Correlated uncertainty PYTHIA Perugia 11 15 10 5 0 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 g ALI − PREL − 101580 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 19

  20. • larger p T D in Pb-Pb compared to PYTHIA → indicates fewer constituents in quenched jets • LeSub in Pb-Pb in good agreement with Pb-Pb: → hardest splittings likely unaffected 0.2 6 /GeV) D ALICE Preliminary ALICE Preliminary T 0.18 Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV p Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV NN NN dN/d 5 Anti- charged jets, = 0.2 Anti- k charged jets, R = 0.2 k R 0.16 T T ALICE Data c jet,ch jet,ch 40 < p < 60 GeV/ c 40 < p <60 GeV/ c ( 0.14 Shape uncertainty T T 4 LeSub ALICE Data jets Correlated uncertainty 0.12 Shape uncertainty PYTHIA Perugia 11 1/N 3 0.1 Correlated uncertainty PYTHIA Perugia 11 dN/d 0.08 2 0.06 jets 0.04 1 1/N 0.02 0 0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 p D LeSub (GeV/ c ) T ALI − PREL − 101584 ALI − PREL − 101588 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 20

  21. Jet shapes: model comparison • trends reproduced by JEWEL jet quenching model: collimation through emission of soft particles at large angles JEWEL: K.C. Zapp, F. Kraus, U.A. Wiedemann, JHEP 1303 (2013) 080 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17 21

  22. Summary • hard probes allow to probe properties of the QGP • first insights on dynamics parton of energy loss from jet nuclear suppression factor and jet shape measurements • non-zero jet v 2 indicates path-length dependence of jet quenching • run2: extended calorimetry allows to assess new observables 22 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

  23. - Backup - 23 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

  24. Jet reconstruction • Establish correspondence between detector measurements / final state particles / partons • two types of jet finder: - iterative cone - sequential recombination (e.g. anti-k T ) • resolution parameter R hep-ph/0802.1189 24

  25. QCD matter at LHC • direct photons: prompt photons from hard scattering + thermal radiation from QCD matter • low-p T inverse slope parameter: T eff = 297 +/- 12 stat. +/- 42 syst. MeV/c • indicates initial temperature way above T C arXiv 1509.07324 [nucl-ex] 25 Oliver Busch – TGSW 2016 /09/17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend