recent flow results from lhc
play

Recent flow results from LHC Soft probes, hard probes and their - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Recent flow results from LHC Soft probes, hard probes and their interplay You Zhou Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund Anisotropic flow in Pb-Pb collisions Hydro: J. Noronha-Hostler etc,


  1. Recent flow results from LHC — Soft probes, hard probes and their interplay You Zhou Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  2. Anisotropic flow in Pb-Pb collisions Hydro: J. Noronha-Hostler etc, PRC93, 034912 (2016) − → ALICE, PRL 116 (2016) 132302 V 2 − → V 3 3.2264d0 ❖ v 2 , v 3 and v 4 are nicely described by hydrodynamic predictions • Similarly v n data reproduced by hydro for Xe-Xe collisions ALICE, PLB784 (2018) 82 ❖ QGP: a state of perfect liquid described by hydrodynamics • Two main uncertainties of hydro: initial conditions and η /s 2 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  3. What Xe-Xe collisions bring , arXiv:1901.07997 3.2264d0 ❖ Flow measurements in different collision systems (Pb-Pb and Xe-Xe) will help to better understand the initial state models • use v n [Xe-Xe]/v n [Pb-Pb] to probe initial conditions, better description with deformed Xe • new collision system (e.g. O-O) will improve our understanding on IC 3 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  4. Extract initial conditions and η /s(T) 3.2264d0 ❖ Theory can be further constrained by combined Pb-Pb & Xe-Xe fits • Initial conditions by the same initial state model; common η /s(T) and ζ /s(T) ❖ Theory can be further constrained by sensitive flow observables 4 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  5. Underlying p.d.f. of v n v n {m} Moments p(v n ) 3.2264d0 ALICE, JHEP 1807 (2018) 103 ❖ Investigating p(v 2 ) with multi-particle cumulants • constraints on various initial state models 5 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  6. Correlations between v m and v n Symmetric cumulants: SC ( m, n ) = h v 2 m v 2 n i � h v 2 m i h v 2 n i SC(m,n) 〉 3 6 2 n − 10 × v 1 〈 2 2 ALICE Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV 〉 SC(4,2)/ 〈 v 〉 〈 v 〉 m NN 4 2 2 Symmetri Cumulant, 2 v 〈 2 2 SC(4,2) SC(3,2)/ 〈 v 〉 〈 v 〉 SC(m,n)/ 3 2 A. Bilandzic etc, 1 SC(3,2) 0.5 PRC 89, 064904 (2014) 0 0 1 Hydrodynamics − SC(4,2), η /s=0.20 Hydrodynamics SC(4,2), η /s(T) param1 2 2 − 2 SC(4,2)/ 〈 v 〉 〈 v 〉 , η /s=0.20 SC(4,2), /s(T) param4 η ALICE, 4 2 2 2 3.2264d0 SC(4,2)/ v v , /s(T) param1,2,3,4 〈 〉 〈 〉 η SC(3,2), η /s=0.20 0.5 − 4 2 2 2 SC(3,2)/ v v , /s=0.20 〈 〉 〈 〉 η SC(3,2), η /s(T) param1 PRL117, 182301 (2016) 3 − 3 2 2 2 SC(3,2), /s(T) param4 SC(3,2)/ 〈 v 〉 〈 v 〉 , η /s(T) param1,2,3,4 η 3 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 centrality percentile centrality percentile ❖ Comparison of SC and Normalized SC (NSC) to hydrodynamic calculations • Although hydro describes v n fairly well, there is not a single centrality for which a given η /s parameterization describes simultaneously SC and NSC -> tighter constraints! • NSC(3,2) measurements provide direct access into the initial conditions (despite details of systems evolution) 6 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  7. Higher harmonic and higher order ALICE, PRC 97, 024906 (2018) 3.2264d0 ❖ Higher harmonic SC (NSC) could provide tighter constraints on models • Initial conditions & η /s(T) ❖ Outlook : higher order (6- and 8-particle) SC and NSC • SC(2,2,3), SC(2,3,3), SC(2,2,3, 3) -> probe (v 24 , v 32 ), (v 22 , v 34 ), (v 24 , v 34 ) correlation • SC(2,3,4) -> probe (v 22 , v 32 , v 42 ) correlation 7 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  8. Correlations between ψ n and ψ m L. Yan etc, PLB744 (2015) 82 n,mk Pb-Pb s = 2.76 TeV ρ 422 = v 4 , 22 v 4 { 2 } ⇡ h cos(4 Ψ 4 � 4 Ψ 2 ) i NN 1 1 ρ ALICE ρ 0.8 0.8 ρ 532 = v 5 , 32 4,22 ρ v 5 { 2 } ⇡ h cos(5 Ψ 5 � 3 Ψ 3 � 2 Ψ 2 ) i 5,32 ρ 0.6 0.6 6,222 ATLAS (PRC90, 024905) ρ 6,33 cos(4 -4 ) ρ 6222 = v 6 , 222 〈 Φ Φ 〉 v 6 { 2 } ⇡ h cos(6 Ψ 6 � 6 Ψ 2 ) i 4 w 0.4 0.4 2 cos(5 -2 - 3 ) 〈 Φ Φ Φ 〉 2 3 w 5 〈 cos(6 Φ -6 Φ ) 〉 2 0.2 0.2 w ρ 633 = v 6 , 33 6 〈 cos(6 Φ -6 Φ ) 〉 v 6 { 2 } ⇡ h cos(6 Ψ 6 � 6 Ψ 3 ) i ρ ρ 3 w 6 4,22 5,32 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 n,mk IP-Glasma + MUSIC + UrQMD ALICE, 1 1 ρ ρ 4,22 PLB773 (2017) 68 ρ 0.8 0.8 5,32 ρ 3.2264d0 6,222 0.6 0.6 ρ ATLAS Collaboration, 6,33 PRC90, 024905 (2014) 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 IP-Glasma: ρ ρ 6,222 6,33 S. McDonald et al., 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 PRC 95, 064913 (2017) Centrality percentile Centrality percentile ❖ ψ n and ψ m correlations with ρ n,mk • Agreement between ALICE and ATLAS (different eta coverage) • Results are compatible with hydrodynamic calculations using IP-Glasma & η /s=0.095 • Precise measurements using Pb-Pb 5.02 TeV data are available 8 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  9. Individual constraints Y. Zhou, Nuclear Physics A 982 (2019) 71 3.2264d0 9 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  10. Differential flow (soft probe) ALICE, JHEP 09 (2017) 032 n Hydrodynamics Pb-Pb = 2.76 TeV ALICE s v NN {2} , MC-KLN & /s=0.20 η {2,| |>0.8} ∆ η v Centrality: 20-30% v n 2 {2} , MC-Glb & η /s=0.08 0.2 0.2 {2,| |>0.8} 0.2 v ∆ η v n | η | < 0.8 3 {2} , Trento & /s(T) η {2,| |>0.8} v ∆ η v n 4 {2} , AMPT & /s=0.08 η v n 0.1 0.1 0.1 v 2 v 3 v 4 3.2264d0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 (GeV/ ) (GeV/ ) (GeV/ ) p c p c p c ALI − DER − 139356 T T T ❖ More detailed information are carried by differential measurements ❖ comparisons of data and hydrodynamic calculations show: • strong constraints on the initial state and η /s(T) of QGP • calculations with AMPT -initial conditions give the best description of data 10 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  11. Differential flow (hard probe) PLB776 (2017) 195 3.2264d0 ❖ SHEE describes the data better than CUJET3.0 • modeling the initial-state fluctuations are crucial ingredient to describe the experimental data related to parton energy loss • (For SHEE) Linear path-length dependence of the energy loss works better than quadratic ones 11 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  12. Connection of low and high p T PLB776 (2017) 195 3.2264d0 ❖ Correlation between high-p T and low-p T v 2 • Investigate connection between v 2 induced by hydrodynamic flow and the path-length dependence of parton energy loss • Data described by linear function, initial-state geometry and its fluctuations are likely to be the common causes of the observed v 2 at both low and high p T ❖ Outlook: • quantify the correlation strength with <v 2 (p TLow ) 2 v 2 (p THigh ) 2 > - <v 2 (p TLow ) 2 ><v 2 (p THigh ) 2 > 12 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  13. What about intermediated p T 3.2264d0 ❖ Low p T -> “ hydrodynamic flow ” (soft probe) ❖ High p T -> “ parton energy loss ” (hard probe) ❖ What about 2 ≲ p T ≲ 10 GeV/ c -> “recombination? coalescence?” • interplay of soft and hard probes? Discussions in this COST workshop! 13 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  14. D meson Flow ❖ D 0 vs charged hadron (or light flavor) CMS, PRL120, 202301 (2018) • D 0 v 2 and v 3 show smaller but similar p T dependence ❖ Data vs theory • at low p T , comparisons suggest that the charm quarks flow • For p T > 6 GeV/ c , v 2 (D 0 ) ≃ v 2 (ch), the path length dependence of charm quark energy 3.2264d0 loss is similar to that of light quarks ❖ Results for charmonium are also available ❖ Question: non-flow in data and theory? • vs. ? • Outlook: multi-particle cumulants? • More non-flow, see: K.GULBRANDSEN @ Wed. 14:45 14 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  15. D meson flow with ESE ALICE, arXiv:1809.09371 3.2264d0 ❖ Charged hadrons: • almost no p T dependence (up to 12 GeV/ c ) • the usage of q 2 provides a selection of a global property of the collision ❖ D meson • q 2 selection effect seems similar with charged hadrons within large uncertainty 15 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  16. Summary ❖ Anisotropic flow, services as soft and hard probes, enable more possibilities to explore the QGP properties ❖ LHC Run3 program (high luminosity, new collision systems) as well as new theoretical efforts provide new opportunities! 3.2264d0 Thanks for your attention! 16 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  17. New PhD position at NBI Villum Young Investigator program — “Creating a smallest droplet of early universe in the Laboratory” 3.2264d0 ❖ New PhD position in ALICE group, APPLY now 17 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  18. backup 3.2264d0 18 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  19. Global Bayesian Analysis S. Bass, QM2017 using Pb-Pb data only 3.2264d0 19 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  20. Flow as hard probes ATLAS, EPJC78 (2018) 784 3.2264d0 ❖ 20 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

  21. Anisotropic flow and QGP ALICE, PRL107, 032301 (2011) EKRT: H. Niemi et. al, PRC 93, 024907 (2016) 3.2264d0 ❖ v n also quantitatively described by hydrodynamics using EKRT, AMPT, Trento initial conditions (but not MC-Glauber, nor MC-KLN) with different η /s(T) 21 You Zhou (NBI) @ COST workshop, Lund

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend