Project Update Dal Hawks | Project Director 09/03/2009 Progress - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

project update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Project Update Dal Hawks | Project Director 09/03/2009 Progress - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Project Update Dal Hawks | Project Director 09/03/2009 Progress Update June - October: November 19: Winter 2010: Spring 2010: December: DB Proposal DB Proposals Design / Construction Selection Development Due Mobilization Starts


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Project Update

09/03/2009

Dal Hawks | Project Director

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Progress Update

  • Proposer one-on-one meetings ongoing
  • Design-Build proposals due in 11 weeks

June - October: Proposal Development November 19: DB Proposals Due December: DB Selection Winter 2010: Design / Mobilization Spring 2010: Construction Starts

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Procurement Schedule

 Released RFQ (www.i15core.utah.gov): Apr 16  Design builders submit SOQs: May 14  Short list design builders: May 28  Commission endorsement of values statement: May  Issue RFP: Jun 16

  • Conduct industry outreach and technical proposal discussions:

Jun 17 to Oct 30

  • Issue final RFP addendum: Oct 13
  • Design builders submit proposals: Nov 19
  • Select design builder: December
  • Start construction: Spring 2010
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Expansion from American Fork to Provo

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fixed Price/Best Design Approach

  • Analysis of DB approaches led to Fixed

Price/Best Design method

  • Bidders develop highest-value, creative

solution for fixed construction budget

  • Proposals evaluated on meeting or exceeding

defined criteria

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Selection Criteria

  • Proposals are evaluated by defined criteria:

– Technical, must-have requirements – Pass/Fail elements – Project goals and values

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Three Design-Build Proposers

  • Three teams short-listed to bid on I-15 CORE

– Committed: Fully engaged in the process; Developing unique plans and solutions – Competent: partnerships of local, national and international firms with successful design-build experience – Competitive: process is driving innovation and increased value

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Flatiron-Skanska-Zachry

  • Flatiron Constructors
  • Skanska USA Civil West

California District

  • Zachry Construction

Corportation

  • CH2M Hill
  • AECOM Inc
  • AMEC Earth and

Environmental

  • Project Engineering

Consultants (PEC)

  • Resource Systems Group

(RSG)

  • Stanley Consultants
  • Earthtec Testing and

Environmental

  • Dr. T Leslie Youd Consultant
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Provo River Constructors

  • Fluor Enterprises
  • Ames Construction Company
  • Ralph L. Wadsworth

Construction Company

  • Wadsworth Brothers

Construction Company

  • Fluor/HDR Global Design

Consultants

  • Michael Baker Jr.
  • Jacobs Engineering Group
  • H.W. Lochner
  • Kleinfelder West
  • Intermountain

GeoEnvironmental Services

  • CRS Consulting Engineers
  • Raba-Kistner Consultants
  • TransCore IP
  • Stillwell & Associates
  • Applied Research Associates
  • Fehr & Peers Transportation

Consultants

  • Psomas
  • CME Transportation Group
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Timpanogos Transportation Constructors

  • Kiewit Western Co.
  • Granite Construction

Company

  • W.W. Clyde & Co.
  • Parsons Transportation

Group

  • PB Americas
  • Wasatch Electric (a division
  • f Dynalectric)
  • Apex Design, PC
  • Bowen, Collins & Associates
  • GeoEngineers
  • Shannon & Wilson
  • Stantec
  • SWCA Environmental

Consultants

  • TBE Group
  • Terracon Consultants
  • URS Corporation
  • Utility Mapping Services
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Maintenance of Traffic

  • Project Goal: Minimize inconvenience to the public
  • Strict contract requirements regarding MOT
  • UDOT will evaluate and score design-build team

MOT plans as part of the selection process

  • Design-build MOT plans become contractual

requirements

  • Public information and education is a top priority
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Mainline I-15 MOT Requirements

  • Peak Period Full Closure: not allowed
  • Off-Peak Full Closure: not allowed during Holiday

Period or Civic Event Period

  • Peak Period Partial Closure: maintain minimum of 2
  • r 3 lanes in each direction (one lane fewer than

existing)

  • Off-Peak Partial Closure:

– Maintain a minimum of 2 lanes in each direction – Limited allowance to reduce to 1 lane – Not allowed during Holiday Period or Civic Event Period

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ramp MOT Requirements

  • Full or Partial Closure: not allowed at consecutive
  • n-ramps or consecutive off-ramps
  • Full Closure: not allowed at SR-77, SR-75, University

Ave, University Parkway, Pleasant Grove Blvd, American Fork Main, Lehi Main

  • Long-Term Full Closure: generally 30-90 days, specific

to proposers’ plans

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cross Street MOT Requirements

  • Full or Partial Closure: limited to ensure that all cross

streets in an area are not closed at the same time

  • Long-Term Full Closure: limited to certain cross

streets for pre-determined durations

  • Short-Term Full Closure: limited to cross streets

passing under I-15

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proposal Stage Form F: Sheets F-1 through F-6: Contractor provides

Long-Term Closure durations in boxes for each element

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Proposal Stage MOT Evaluation – Regional mobility modeled for proposed phasing and closures

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Public Notification of Closures

  • Design-Builder is responsible for providing

advance notice of all closures

  • UDOT is responsible for disseminating the

information to the public

  • Public notified via:

– E-mail – Web site – Radio – News media – Text messaging – Roadway signs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

For More Information:

Phone: 1-888-i15core (1-888-415-2673) Email: i15core@utah.gov Website: www.i15core.utah.gov