Progress Index National Economic Dialogue Dublin, 28 June 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
progress
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Progress Index National Economic Dialogue Dublin, 28 June 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 27, 2023 208 likes •339 views

2017 Social Progress Index National Economic Dialogue Dublin, 28 June 2017 Michael Green CEO, Social Progress Imperative How do we advance society? Economic Social Progress Development The factors which GDP per capita make up a good

slide-1
SLIDE 1

2017 Social Progress Index

National Economic Dialogue Dublin, 28 June 2017 Michael Green CEO, Social Progress Imperative

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Economic Development

GDP per capita

Social Progress

The factors which make up a good life for individuals and a healthy society

How do we advance society?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Social Progress Index design principles:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Social Progress framework answers universally important questions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Social Progress Index is an aggregate index of social and environmental indicators that capture three dimensions

  • f social progress

It includes data from 128 countries on 50 indicators

  • An additional 61 countries

have partial results It includes 98% of the world population

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The average world score rose from 63.19 in 2014 to 64.85 in 2017 – a 2.6% increase

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ireland ranks 11th in 2017 Social Progress Index

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

0K 5K 1 0K 1 5K 20K 25K 30K 35K 40K 45K 50K 55K 60K 65K 70K 20 40 60 80 1 00 Y emen U ruguay T urkey R ussia P

  • rtugal

P eru N

  • rway

N igeria N ew Zealand Netherlands Montenegro Mongolia Mexico Malaysia Laos Japan Jamaica Italy Iran India G hana G ermany G eorgia D enmark C zech R epublic C yprus C roatia C

  • ngo, R

epublic of C hile C entral A frican R epublic C anada C ameroon Brazil Bolivia A zerbaijan A ustria A rgentina A fghanistan U nited S tates U nited K ingdom S witzerland S audi A rabia N iger K uwait Israel Ireland F rance C

  • sta R

ica A ngola

Social Progress Index vs GDP per capita

VERY HIGH HIGH UPPER MIDDLE LOWER MIDDLE LOW VERY LOW

201 7 S

  • cial Progress Index S

cores S

  • cial Progress

Index Tiers G DP per capita, PPP (constant 201 1 international $)

Across the spectrum, we see how some countries are much better at turning their economic growth into social progress than

  • thers
slide-10
SLIDE 10

0K 5K 1 0K 1 5K 20K 25K 30K 35K 40K 45K 50K 55K 60K 65K 70K 20 40 60 80 1 00 Y emen U ruguay T urkey R ussia P

  • rtugal

P eru N

  • rway

N igeria N ew Zealand Netherlands Montenegro Mongolia Mexico Malaysia Laos Japan Jamaica Italy Iran India G hana G ermany G eorgia D enmark C zech R epublic C yprus C roatia C

  • ngo, R

epublic of C hile C entral A frican R epublic C anada C ameroon Brazil Bolivia A zerbaijan A ustria A rgentina A fghanistan U nited S tates U nited K ingdom S witzerland S audi A rabia N iger K uwait Israel Ireland F rance C

  • sta R

ica A ngola

Social Progress Index vs GDP per capita

VERY HIGH HIGH UPPER MIDDLE LOWER MIDDLE LOW VERY LOW

201 7 S

  • cial Progress Index S

cores S

  • cial Progress

Index Tiers G DP per capita, PPP (constant 201 1 international $)

Ireland shows a very high level of social progress at a very high level

  • f GDP per

capita.

Ireland

slide-11
SLIDE 11

S C OR E R ANK

201 7 S

  • cial Progress Index

88.91 1 1 /1 28 G DP PPP per capita $61 ,378 3/1 28

S C OR E / V ALUE R ANK S TR E NG TH/ W E AKNE S S

B asic Human Needs

93.03 20 Nutrition and B as ic Medical C are 99.23 25

U ndernourishment (%

  • f pop.; 5 signifies ≤ 5)

5.00 1 D epth of food deficit

(calories/undernourished person; 8 signifies ≤ 8)

8.00 1 M aternal mortality rate (deaths/1

00,000 live births)

7 .70 25 C hild mortality rate (deaths/1

,000 live births)

3.60 1 4 D eaths from infectious diseases

(deaths/1 00,000)

28.84 45

W ater and S anitation 95.34 41

A ccess to piped water (%

  • f pop.)

97 .88 35 R ural access to improved water source

(%

  • f pop.)

97 .84 46 A ccess to improved sanitation facilities

(%

  • f pop.)

90.48 56

S helter 87 .82 1 7

A vailability of af ordable housing (%

satisfied)

50.05 55 A ccess to electricity (%

  • f pop.)

1 00.00 1 Q uality of electricity supply (1

=low; 7=high)

6.46 1 4 Household air pollution attributable deaths

(deaths/1 00,000)

0.00 1

P ers

  • nal S

afety 89.72 1 6

Homicide rate (deaths/1

00,000)

1 .1 28 L evel of violent crime (1

=low; 5=high)

2.00 20 P erceived criminality (1

=low; 5=high)

2.00 1 P

  • litical terror (1

=low; 5=high)

1 .00 1 T raf c deaths (deaths/1

00,000)

4.1 9

S C OR E / V ALUE R ANK S TR E NG TH/ W E AKNE S S

Foundations of W ellbeing

87 .86 1 6 A cces s to B as ic K nowledge 98.85 1 3

A dult literacy rate (%

  • f pop. aged 1

5+)

P rimary school enrollment (%

  • f children)

99.30 29 S econdary school enrollment (%

  • f children)

1 00.00 1 G ender parity in secondary enrollment

(distance from parity)

0.02 42

A cces s to Information and C

  • mmunications

89.98 1 3

M

  • bile telephone subscriptions

(subscriptions/1 00 people)

1 00.00 1 Internet users (%

  • f pop.)

80.1 2 21 P ress F reedom Index

(0=most free; 1 00=least free)

1 2.40 9

Health and W ellnes s 80.49 1 7

Life expectancy at 60 (years) 24.1 4 1 8 P remature deaths from non-communicable diseases (deaths/1

00,000)

224.1 1 6 S uicide rate (deaths/1

00,000)

9.84 57

E nvironmental Q uality 82.1 1 23

O utdoor air pollution attributable deaths

(deaths/1 00,000)

1 9.26 1 4 W astewater treatment (%

  • f wastewater)

51 .1 1 34 B iodiversity and habitat

(0=no protection; 1 00=high protection)

90.51 40 G reenhouse gas emissions

(CO2 equivalents per GDP)

290.56 31

S C OR E / V ALUE R ANK S TR E NG TH/ W E AKNE S S

O pportunity

85.86 4 P ers

  • nal R

ights 93.09 1

P

  • litical rights (0=no rights; 40=full rights)

39.00 1 3 F reedom of expression

(0=no freedom; 1 6=full freedom)

1 6.00 1 F reedom of assembly

(0=no freedom; 1 =full freedom)

P rivate property rights (0=none; 1

00=full)

90.00 3

P ers

  • nal Freedom and C

hoice 83.71 1 5

F reedom over life choices (%

satisfied)

86.31 25 F reedom of religion (1

=low; 4=high)

4.00 1 E arly marriage (%

  • f women aged 1

5-1 9)

0.00 1 S atisfied demand for contraception

(%

  • f women)

79.50 40 C

  • rruption (0=high; 1

00=low)

73.00 1 6

T

  • lerance and Inclus

ion 86.21 2

T

  • lerance for immigrants (0=low; 1

00=high)

84.76 6 T

  • lerance for homosexuals (0=low; 1

00=high)

82.31 9 D iscrimination and violence against minorities (0=low; 1

0=high)

1 .60 2 R eligious tolerance (1

=low; 4=high)

3.00 54 C

  • mmunity safety net (0=low; 1

00=high)

95.66 2

A cces s to Advanced E ducation 80.42 6

Y ears of tertiary schooling 1 .68 4 W

  • men’s average years in school

1 4.53 21 Inequality in the attainment of education

(0=low; 1 =high)

0.05 29 N umber of globally ranked universities

(0=none; 1 0=most highly rank ed)

5.00 23 P ercent of tertiary students enrolled in globally ranked universities

(0=none; 6=highest enrollment)

5.00 6

IRE LAND

S TR E NG TH/ W E AKNE S S

Oveperforming and underperforming are relative to 1 5 countries of similar G DP per capita: S audi Arabia, United S tates, Netherlands, Austria, S weden, Denmark, S witzerland, G ermany, Australia, Canada, Belgium, Iceland, Finland, United Kingdom, France

Overperforming by 1

  • r more pts.

Overperforming by less than 1 pt. P erforming within the expected range Underperforming by less than 1 pt. Underperforming by 1

  • r more pts.

No data available

S trengths and weaknesses

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Social Progress Index helps:

  • Design programmes and

policies.

  • Direct investments and

assess risks.

  • Forge new partnerships

and catalyze innovation.

  • Track progress toward

the complementary Sustainable Development Goals