Program Growth
Year Registered Land Area Harvest
Colorado’s Industrial Hemp Program
The Regulatory Program and Industry Status
Nov 20th, 2017
Program Growth Colorados Industrial Hemp Program The Regulatory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Program Growth Colorados Industrial Hemp Program The Regulatory Program and Industry Status Year Registered Land Area Harvest Nov 20 th , 2017 Colorado Counties Incorporated What is Industrial Hemp? Federal Farm Bill Definit ion The term
Nov 20th, 2017
If it is over 0.3% delt a-9 THC concent rat ion it is marijuana and it is not Indust rial Hemp. And if it is not grown in a regulat ed syst em, federally or in CO, it is not Indust rial Hemp no mat t er what t he THC is.
You just can’t get high from hemp.
agreements generally recognized a limit of 0.3% THC.
THC.
THC.
0.3% THC concentration and below in the Constitution.
Congressional Research Committee- Hemp as an Agricultural Commodity 3/ 10/ 17 10000000 20000000 30000000 40000000 50000000 60000000 70000000 80000000
1 2 3 4 5 6
Grain Fiber 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $ Imported
Domestic production continues to increase as more states provide regulatory structures for and more processors begin to enter the market. 2014 – 220 acres(200) less than 300,000 sqft (270,000) 2015- 2500 acres (2200) .6 million sqft (570,000) 2016 – 8900 acres (5700) 1.6 million sqft (1.2) 2017 – 25000 acres (9800) 2.2 million sqft (2.1) Until 2017, CO has accounted for more than 50%
production every year since it was authorized in 2014.
In 2014 we saw mostly small outdoor operations, limited agronomic expertise, most growers were under capitalized and a significant number registered purely for a historic certificate with no intent to plant. We are seeing a shift in the industry. Outdoor production space has increased significantly and indoor space registered exploded. The size of individual growing sites increased and has moved to traditional agricultural production areas. Agronomic practices have improved. Businesses are better funded and production plans are better developed. More investors and processors are entering the market.
Individually 10 registrants have more acres registered in 2017 than all registrants combined grew in 2014. The two largest producers registered more acres than all states combined harvested in 2015.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 11 11 13 14 14 16 21 24 25 29 33 34 40 65 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Bent Gilpin Las Animas Moffat Ouray Phillips Summit Teller Cheyenne Denver Grand Kit Carson Pitkin Archuleta Conejos Morgan Prowers San Miguel Washington Broomfield Custer Logan Rio Grande Arapahoe Montezuma Park Huerfano Routt Douglas Baca Chaffee Elbert Yuma Adams Jefferson La Plata Costilla Saguache Garfield Fremont Pueblo El Paso Alamosa Otero Montrose Boulder Mesa Larimer Delta Weld
numReg/county
numReg/county
The CDA grants commercial and research & development registrations on specific land areas for the cultivation of industrial hemp within CO. It is a voluntary program. Land areas not registered with the program are not protected by this program from local, state or federal agencies. We inspect and sample cannabis growing on registered land to verify compliance. While we work with the industry to understand the issues involved with this emerging industry we have no jurisdiction
does not mean no one regulates these processes. Other state
It is required to obtain a registration to cultivate industrial hemp under the Farm Bill. In Colorado Constitutionally you can grow six marijuana
marijuana is a land area voluntarily registered to grown industrial hemp. That makes registering a land area and not the individual critical to our program. That also means Colorado has a little different relationship with some of our federal partners, including the DEA, because of our Cannabis landscape.
Ensure compliance with federal guidelines in the Cole Memorandum and comply with the 2014 Farm Bill. Ensure that all registrants in have a level playing field in the market.
doing so. Ensure that those that abuse the system are denied access
jeopardize the program for those that follow the Rules.
The Dept. samples within 30 days of harvest. We avoid sampling the outside edges of the field but allow our inspectors to use their judgement on where to select. We sample only female plants. We sample the female flower when it is present but for material being grown for biomass and harvested before flowering we select the top two inches of the plant. The sample size is reflective of the crop size; ½ oz. for individual plants, small plots with less than 100 plants the target is 3oz with a minimum of 1oz, larger plots but less than an acre the target is 8
amount is 8 oz.
In 2014 31%
THC threshold. The quantity of material however was very limited and nothing found was highly intoxicating. In 2015 and 2016 those compliance rates continued to improve slightly each year and growers began sorting out those varieties that were failing. In 2016, 1232 acres were destroyed for exceeding the THC limit. 78%
2017 compliance rates are above 91% . The number of acres exceeding 0.3% THC is also lower, less than 800 acres. Most of the acres exceeding the THC limit in 2017 are in two varieties; one a recurring problem variety from 2016 (Colorado Gold) and one new variety (Marquis M-1) not previously seen or sampled in CO. Less than 1%
these two varieties.
In CO a waiver from civil penalties can be requested for material that is above 0.3% but below 1.0% if the material is destroyed on site in a manner approved by the
may be subject to civil penalties and must be destroyed on site in a manner approved by the Commissioner. In either case it can not be transported, used for human consumption or enter the stream of commerce. If the crop exceeds 0.3% it is no longer industrial hemp and could be subject to criminal prosecution as an illegal marijuana grow. Law enforcement may be notified in either case.
1) Application including eligibility documentation. (CDA & CSU) 2) THC Testing for variety approval. (CDA) 3) Certified Seed Production from Registered or Foundation seed. (CSU/CSGA according to A0SCA Rules) 4) Labeling requirements. (CDA/ CSU/CSGA) It is more than a variety list it is a production system to insure breeders investments are protected and farmers get seed that will produce mature plants with a THC below 0.3% .
Changing federal tides and lack of clarity and uniformity at the federal level. Different state regulations and interpretations of the Farm Bill. A developing identity crisis is emerging; division in the industry.
System ‘gamers’ (delaying harvest, MJ plantings). The ‘can’t catch us all’ non-registering growers.
The blurring of the MJ line. Local law enforcement becoming increasingly involved.
Unregistered grow sites, intentionally delayed harvests, marijuana planted inside registered land areas and attempts to blur the lines between industrial hemp and marijuana are beginning to have a negative impact on the emergence of the industry. Local law enforcement and regional drug task forces are
also evolving. The industry is at a critical point between those that view hemp as an agricultural crop and those that see it as a stepping stone to a broader Cannabis discussion and industry.