Professor Sir Brian Harrison, FBA The history of the future THE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

professor sir brian harrison fba
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Professor Sir Brian Harrison, FBA The history of the future THE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Founders Lecture 2016 Professor Sir Brian Harrison, FBA The history of the future THE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE PHASE 1: THE AFTERLIFE AS INSPIRATION (c.1600-c.1800) religion & politics inseparable mercantilism enthroned PHASE 2: SELF-


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Founder’s Lecture 2016 Professor Sir Brian Harrison, FBA ‘The history of the future’

slide-2
SLIDE 2

THE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE

PHASE 1: THE AFTERLIFE AS INSPIRATION (c.1600-c.1800) religion & politics inseparable mercantilism enthroned PHASE 2: SELF-HELP FACILITATES A ‘HEAVEN BELOW’ (c.1800-c.1900) industrialization loosens up change in all areas from mercantilism to free trade Liberal Party ‘opens windows’ respectability pursued ‘making of the English middle class’ PHASE 3: FROM INDIVIDUALIST UTOPIA TO STATIST DYSTOPIA? (c.1900-c.2000) urbanization & industrialization demand an expanding central state growth of government expertise & personnel utopian inspiration for early labour movement: Owen, Morris, Bellamy help from projecting existing trends forward BUT difficulties abound: hence crises of 1960s & 1970s dystopias advance (Forster, Huxley, Orwell) as utopias retire but dystopias have much in common with utopias and politicians deserve to be defended against both PHASE 4: AN ALL-ABSORBING PRESENT accelerating media-driven preoccupation with the present

  • ngoing secularization of an earth-bound future

apologies for the past yoked to mortgaging of the future science fiction and ‘futures studies’ no guide to the future despite H.G.Wells’s enthusiasm, they remain defensive in mood like historians, they depend inevitably on documents from the past

slide-3
SLIDE 3

‘London street corner on Sunday morning’ 1856 Illustrated London News

slide-4
SLIDE 4

THE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE

PHASE 1: THE AFTERLIFE AS INSPIRATION (c.1600-c.1800) religion & politics inseparable mercantilism enthroned PHASE 2: SELF-HELP FACILITATES A ‘HEAVEN BELOW’ (c.1800-c.1900) industrialization loosens up change in all areas from mercantilism to free trade Liberal Party ‘opens windows’ respectability pursued ‘making of the English middle class’ PHASE 3: FROM INDIVIDUALIST UTOPIA TO STATIST DYSTOPIA? (c.1900-c.2000) urbanization & industrialization demand an expanding central state growth of government expertise & personnel utopian inspiration for early labour movement: Owen, Morris, Bellamy help from projecting existing trends forward BUT difficulties abound: hence crises of 1960s & 1970s dystopias advance (Forster, Huxley, Orwell) as utopias retire but dystopias have much in common with utopias and politicians deserve to be defended against both PHASE 4: AN ALL-ABSORBING PRESENT accelerating media-driven preoccupation with the present

  • ngoing secularization of an earth-bound future

apologies for the past yoked to mortgaging of the future science fiction and ‘futures studies’ no guide to the future despite H.G.Wells’s enthusiasm, they remain defensive in mood like historians, they depend inevitably on documents from the past

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Savings Bank and the Losing Bank

  • J. W. Kirton ‘Four Pillars of Temperance’ (1865)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

THE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE

PHASE 1: THE AFTERLIFE AS INSPIRATION (c.1600-c.1800) religion & politics inseparable mercantilism enthroned PHASE 2: SELF-HELP FACILITATES A ‘HEAVEN BELOW’ (c.1800-c.1900) industrialization loosens up change in all areas from mercantilism to free trade Liberal Party ‘opens windows’ respectability pursued ‘making of the English middle class’ PHASE 3: FROM INDIVIDUALIST UTOPIA TO STATIST DYSTOPIA? (c.1900-c.2000) urbanization & industrialization demand an expanding central state growth of government expertise & personnel utopian inspiration for early labour movement: Owen, Morris, Bellamy help from projecting existing trends forward BUT difficulties abound: hence crises of 1960s & 1970s dystopias advance (Forster, Huxley, Orwell) as utopias retire but dystopias have much in common with utopias and politicians deserve to be defended against both PHASE 4: AN ALL-ABSORBING PRESENT accelerating media-driven preoccupation with the present

  • ngoing secularization of an earth-bound future

apologies for the past yoked to mortgaging of the future science fiction and ‘futures studies’ no guide to the future despite H.G.Wells’s enthusiasm, they remain defensive in mood like historians, they depend inevitably on documents from the past

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

THE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE

PHASE 1: THE AFTERLIFE AS INSPIRATION (c.1600-c.1800) religion & politics inseparable mercantilism enthroned PHASE 2: SELF-HELP FACILITATES A ‘HEAVEN BELOW’ (c.1800-c.1900) industrialization loosens up change in all areas from mercantilism to free trade Liberal Party ‘opens windows’ respectability pursued ‘making of the English middle class’ PHASE 3: FROM INDIVIDUALIST UTOPIA TO STATIST DYSTOPIA? (c.1900-c.2000) urbanization & industrialization demand an expanding central state growth of government expertise & personnel utopian inspiration for early labour movement: Owen, Morris, Bellamy help from projecting existing trends forward BUT difficulties abound: hence crises of 1960s & 1970s dystopias advance (Forster, Huxley, Orwell) as utopias retire but dystopias have much in common with utopias and politicians deserve to be defended against both PHASE 4: AN ALL-ABSORBING PRESENT accelerating media-driven preoccupation with the present

  • ngoing secularization of an earth-bound future

apologies for the past yoked to mortgaging of the future science fiction and ‘futures studies’ no guide to the future despite H.G.Wells’s enthusiasm, they remain defensive in mood like historians, they depend inevitably on documents from the past

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Daily Express November 1940

slide-10
SLIDE 10

THE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE

PHASE 1: THE AFTERLIFE AS INSPIRATION (c.1600-c.1800) religion & politics inseparable mercantilism enthroned PHASE 2: SELF-HELP FACILITATES A ‘HEAVEN BELOW’ (c.1800-c.1900) industrialization loosens up change in all areas from mercantilism to free trade Liberal Party ‘opens windows’ respectability pursued ‘making of the English middle class’ PHASE 3: FROM INDIVIDUALIST UTOPIA TO STATIST DYSTOPIA? (c.1900-c.2000) urbanization & industrialization demand an expanding central state growth of government expertise & personnel utopian inspiration for early labour movement: Owen, Morris, Bellamy help from projecting existing trends forward BUT difficulties abound: hence crises of 1960s & 1970s dystopias advance (Forster, Huxley, Orwell) as utopias retire but dystopias have much in common with utopias and politicians deserve to be defended against both PHASE 4: AN ALL-ABSORBING PRESENT accelerating media-driven preoccupation with the present

  • ngoing secularization of an earth-bound future

apologies for the past yoked to mortgaging of the future science fiction and ‘futures studies’ no guide to the future despite H.G.Wells’s enthusiasm, they remain defensive in mood like historians, they depend inevitably on documents from the past

slide-11
SLIDE 11

16 April 1936

slide-12
SLIDE 12

THE HISTORY OF THE FUTURE

PHASE 1: THE AFTERLIFE AS INSPIRATION (c.1600-c.1800) religion & politics inseparable mercantilism enthroned PHASE 2: SELF-HELP FACILITATES A ‘HEAVEN BELOW’ (c.1800-c.1900) industrialization loosens up change in all areas from mercantilism to free trade Liberal Party ‘opens windows’ respectability pursued ‘making of the English middle class’ PHASE 3: FROM INDIVIDUALIST UTOPIA TO STATIST DYSTOPIA? (c.1900-c.2000) urbanization & industrialization demand an expanding central state growth of government expertise & personnel utopian inspiration for early labour movement: Owen, Morris, Bellamy help from projecting existing trends forward BUT difficulties abound: hence crises of 1960s & 1970s dystopias advance (Forster, Huxley, Orwell) as utopias retire but dystopias have much in common with utopias and politicians deserve to be defended against both PHASE 4: AN ALL-ABSORBING PRESENT accelerating media-driven preoccupation with the present

  • ngoing secularization of an earth-bound future

apologies for the past yoked to mortgaging of the future science fiction and ‘futures studies’ no guide to the future despite H.G.Wells’s enthusiasm, they remain defensive in mood like historians, they depend inevitably on documents from the past