professor dyfrig hughes bangor university
play

Professor Dyfrig Hughes, Bangor University 1 Overall aim of the ABC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

8 th December 2011 European Parliament Building, Brussels, Belgium Professor Dyfrig Hughes, Bangor University 1 Overall aim of the ABC project Produce evidence -based recommendations to inform the content of European policy relating to


  1. 8 th December 2011 European Parliament Building, Brussels, Belgium Professor Dyfrig Hughes, Bangor University 1

  2. Overall aim of the ABC project “Produce evidence -based recommendations to inform the content of European policy relating to patient adherence to medicines, to achieve safer, and clinical and cost-effective use of medicines in Europe” ABC policy recommendations should be: • Evidence- based (‘what works’) • Have consensus • Feasible • Flexible for national/local adaptation 2

  3. WP1 Objective 1 European consensus European consensus on terminology used in the field of deviations from on terminology used assigned treatment and relevant taxonomy Objective 2 in the field of segments Identification and classification Objective 7 of the determinants of non- compliance with short-term and deviations from Preparation of policy long-term treatment for different recommendation for promoting clinical sectors, health care patient compliance in European settings and population healthcare assigned treatment segments and relevant taxonomy Objective 3 Objective 6 Development of a conceptual Assessment of the cost- framework for the determinants effectiveness of interventions of non-compliance that promote compliance Objective 4 Objective 5 Exploring the current practices Identification and assessment of of compliance management by adherence-enhancing healthcare professionals and interventions the pharmaceutical industry 3

  4. • To conduct a systematic literature review to identify the terminologies commonly used to describe deviations from prescribed treatment in ambulatory patients • Propose a new, consolidated taxonomy and related terminology 4

  5. 5 Vrijens et al, accepted in BJCP (2011)

  6. • Any initiatives in respect to patient adherence to medications should address its 3 distinct elements: – initiation – implementation – discontinuation • Management of adherence derives benefit from a ‘system - based’ approach, wherein each stakeholder has a specific role to play: – the patient, their family & relatives, healthcare providers, institutions, and healthcare systems 6

  7. Objective 1 European consensus on WP2 terminology used in the field of deviations from assigned treatment and relevant taxonomy Identification and Objective 2 segments Identification and Objective 7 classification of the classification of the determinants of non- Preparation of policy compliance with short-term recommendation for and long-term treatment for promoting patient determinants of non- different clinical sectors, compliance in European health care settings and healthcare population segments adherence to short- term and long-term treatment Objective 3 Objective 6 Development of a Assessment of the cost- conceptual framework for effectiveness of the determinants of non- interventions that promote compliance compliance Objective 4 Objective 5 Exploring the current Identification and practices of compliance assessment of adherence- management by healthcare enhancing interventions professionals and the pharmaceutical industry 7

  8. Findings • Multiple patient-, therapy-, condition-, social- and healthcare-system-related factors determine adherence Recommendations • Interventions aimed at improving adherence have to acknowledge the complex nature of non-adherent behaviour 8

  9. • Multinational survey of adherence to medications, and determinants of non- adherence – Poland, Wales, England, Hungary, Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium, Greece, Austria, Portugal • Patients currently prescribed antihypertensive therapy • Target recruitment of 323 per country 9

  10. • Percentage of patients classified as non- adherent to antihypertensive treatment, based on self-report: Country Non-adherence Wales 38.1% England 41.5% Poland 57.6% Hungary 70.3% • There is no correlation between adherence to long-term, and short-term treatments 10

  11. Poland England Wales Morisky MARS Morisky MARS Morisky MARS Employment Gender Affordability Number of items prescribed Concern Concern about about illness illness Treatment Intention control Barriers Barriers Barriers Barriers Self efficacy Self efficacy Self efficacy Self efficacy Self efficacy Self efficacy

  12. • Key targets – improvement in self-efficacy – reducing barriers to medication • Determinants of adherence differ by country (and by the outcome measures used) • Management of adherence in patients co- prescribed multiple medicines for chronic and acute conditions may require different approaches 12

  13. • Drug attributes which influence patients’ stated preferences to continue treatment: – Treatment benefit (positive) – Dose frequency (negative) – Mild adverse events (negative) – Potentially life-threatening but rare adverse events (negative) 13

  14. • To persist with treatment, patients are willing to accept the following trade-offs: – An increase in dosing frequency (OD, BD, QDS) if compensated by a 6% increase in treatment benefit – 24% increase risk of mild adverse events if compensated with a move from an ‘uncommon’ to ‘very - rare’ risk of life - threatening adverse events 14

  15. • Patients’ preferences for drug attributes influence their decision to continue taking a medicine and should be considered when developing new medicines, formulations or interventions 15

  16. Objective 1 European consensus on terminology used in the field of deviations from assigned treatment and relevant taxonomy Objective 2 segments Identification and Objective 7 classification of the determinants of non- Preparation of policy compliance with short-term recommendation for and long-term treatment for promoting patient different clinical sectors, compliance in European health care settings and WP3 healthcare population segments Development of a Objective 3 Objective 6 conceptual Development of a Assessment of the cost- conceptual framework for effectiveness of the determinants of non- interventions that promote framework for the compliance compliance determinants of non- adherence Objective 4 Objective 5 Exploring the current Identification and practices of compliance assessment of adherence- management by healthcare enhancing interventions professionals and the pharmaceutical industry 16

  17. • To systematically review the health psychology and behavioural economics literatures to identify behavioural models that have been used to examine adherence to medication by adult patients • To provide a theoretical basis for the development of adherence-enhancing interventions 17

  18. Potentially relevant papers identified & screened for retrieval (n=2308) Papers excluded based on title and abstract (n=1610) Papers retrieved from more detailed information (n=698) Papers excluded based on full text (n=601) Papers ultimately included in the review (n=97) Health psychology (n=75) Behavioural economics (n=22) 18

  19. • Theories used to explain adherence behaviour:- – Social-cognition models (n=35) – Self regulation models (n=32) – Consumer demand theory (n=21) – Time preference (n=1) • The extent to which individual components of behavioural models were tested varied • Self-report was the most common measure of adherence (n=74) • Studies were mainly cross-sectional (n=71) 19

  20. • Assessment of the theoretical basis of adherence behaviour should inform the development of adherence enhancing interventions • Consolidation of behavioural models across disciplines will benefit the development of interventions that promote a more sustainable behaviour change 20

  21. Objective 1 European consensus on terminology used in the field of deviations from assigned treatment and relevant taxonomy Objective 2 segments Identification and Objective 7 classification of the determinants of non- Preparation of policy compliance with short-term recommendation for and long-term treatment for promoting patient different clinical sectors, compliance in European health care settings and healthcare population segments WP4 Objective 3 Objective 6 Development of a Assessment of the cost- conceptual framework for effectiveness of the determinants of non- interventions that promote compliance compliance Exploring the current practices of adherence management by Objective 4 Objective 5 healthcare professionals Exploring the current Identification and practices of compliance assessment of adherence- management by healthcare enhancing interventions and the pharmaceutical professionals and the pharmaceutical industry industry 21

  22. • Key role in initiation and persistence with patient adherence to medication • Skills mix – role of different healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) • Interventions to support medication adherence often provided or facilitated by healthcare professionals • Gatekeeper/guide to adherence support 22

  23. • Inventory of educational content of undergraduate teaching regarding medication adherence • Survey of healthcare professionals across Europe • Survey of pharma industry adherence initiatives • Review of existing adherence guidelines • New educational framework for healthcare professionals 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend