Prof. Jacqueline Peel, Melbourne Law School Expert Panel on Super - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

prof jacqueline peel melbourne law school expert panel on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Prof. Jacqueline Peel, Melbourne Law School Expert Panel on Super - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Prof. Jacqueline Peel, Melbourne Law School Expert Panel on Super Funds, Climate, and the Law Melbourne, 22 August 2018 OVERVIEW 1. Emergence and growth of climate litigation 2. Global trends in climate litigation 3. Situating the REST case


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • Prof. Jacqueline Peel, Melbourne Law School

Expert Panel on Super Funds, Climate, and the Law Melbourne, 22 August 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OVERVIEW

2

  • 1. Emergence and growth of climate

litigation

  • 2. Global trends in climate litigation
  • 3. Situating the REST case in the

context of global climate litigation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CLIMATE LITIGATION

  • What do we mean by “climate litigation”?
  • Sabin Center:
  • “Climate change litigation” = cases

brought before administrative, judicial and other investigatory bodies that raise issues of law or fact regarding the science of climate change and climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts.

  • Can also include cases where climate change

more peripheral issue

  • Climate litigation may have many different
  • bjectives e.g. challenging projects, forcing

disclosure, improving regulation, recovering loss

3 https://www.greenbiz.com/article/are-countries-legally-required-protect- citizens-climate-change

slide-4
SLIDE 4

GROWTH OF CLIMATE LITIGATION

  • 24 countries plus EU across 6 continents
  • 700+ cases filed in US, and over 250 filed

in other jurisdictions

  • Most litigation has involved statutory

pathways, esp. in US

  • Primary focus on governments but

increasing interest in suits against corporate actors

  • Emerging HR/constitutional rights avenues
  • Most cases deal with climate change

mitigation but emerging body of cases on adaptation issues

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

EPICENTRE– UNITED STATES

  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Clean Air Act: Mass v EPA, Challenges to

Implementation, and Potential Implementation Action

  • Environmental Review (Coal Challenges)
  • Adaptation Cases under Clean Water Act and

State Environmental /Energy Law

  • Common Law/Constitutional Law
  • Nuisance: AEP v Connecticut
  • Public Trust: Kelsey Cascade Rose Juliana v

US

  • Dormant Commerce Clause Challenges
  • Takings and Adaptation (Borough of Harvey

Cedars v. Karan )

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SIGNIFICANT JURISPRUDENCE - AUSTRALIA

  • Mitigation focus on coal-fired power and

coal mines

  • Hazelwood
  • Anvil Hill
  • Ackland coal mine
  • Adani coal mine
  • Adaptation cases focus on range of

impacts, especially coastal

  • Walker v Minister for Planning
  • Gippsland Coastal Board

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EMERGING LITIGATION IN OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD

  • Netherlands: Court found Dutch government

violated duty of care to citizens through inadequate emissions reduction targets

  • Pakistan: Court found breach of citizens’

fundamental constitutional rights including the right to life due to adaptation failures

  • South Africa: Court required environmental

assessment to include climate change for prospective coal plant

  • Colombia: Court ordered Colombian

government to present action plan to reduce deforestation in Amazon region

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Suits against government and

corporate actors seeking accountability for actions/omissions with respect to climate change

  • Lawsuits seeking climate justice

for “victims” of climate change have often targeted corporations, particularly those in the energy sector

  • Tortious and human rights

claims pursued

TRENDS - ACCOUNTABILITY

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CARBON MAJOR LAWSUITS

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Actions based on company law and

fiduciary duties especially around disclosure of climate business risk

  • Driver: Gradual shift in corporate

culture, accelerated by Paris Agreement, to view climate change in financial risk terms

  • Bolstered by TCFD release of

Recommendations (June 2017)

  • Opinions of commercial law

barristers supporting potential liability

TRENDS – CORPORATE CLIMATE RISK THEME

10

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/ailing-coal-giant-peabody- reaches-settlement-over-misleading-climate-comments-20151109-gkusyh.html

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • CBA shareholders sued CBA arguing

CC poses material financial risks to bank’s business that should have been disclosed to investors

  • Proceedings discontinued after

subsequent CBA annual report acknowledged climate as material financial risk and promised to undertake climate scenario analysis of business

  • Bank ruled out lending to Adani

Carmichael mine

CBA LAWSUIT

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Part of ‘corporate’ trend in climate

litigation

  • Focused on different subset of private

sector actors: institutional investors (super and pension funds)

  • Using tools under applicable business

laws for climate purposes

  • Strategic pressure in other

jurisdictions e.g. ClientEarth letters warning of legal action against 14 of UK’s biggest pension funds

WHERE DOES REST CASE FIT?

12

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-25/mark- mcveigh/10030602

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Q&A

13

  • Research funding from ARC, DP160100225, Devising a Legal

Blueprint for Corporate Energy Transition (Peel, Osofsky and McDonnell with A. Foerster)