production efficiency for a grassland
play

production efficiency for a grassland and a forest with similar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comparison of aboveground biomass production efficiency for a grassland and a forest with similar edaphic and climatic conditions Heid L., Darsonville O., Conil S., Klumpp K., Longdoz B. With help of: Naiken A., Gross P., Granier B ICOS


  1. Comparison of aboveground biomass production efficiency for a grassland and a forest with similar edaphic and climatic conditions Heid L., Darsonville O., Conil S., Klumpp K., Longdoz B. With help of: Naiken A., Gross P., Granier B ICOS Belgium Science Conference, 20 octobre 2017

  2. CONTEXT & OBJECTIVES 2

  3. • Evolution in ecosystem management - Intensification, soil changes (structure, fertility, … ) • Climate change (Temperature, Pluviometry) - Drift & extreme events (drought, heat wave, flood, … ) • Need of better understanding of ecosystem C balance - Strategies in C allocation, sequestration & emission (Trumbore, 2006) - Uncertainties around the spatio-temporal variability of milieux semi- theses strategies (Campioli et al., 2013) Humid Building naturels, zones zones 5% bâti humides et 5% Crops aquatiques 10% 10% 30% +0.5% cultures /an 30% +0.1%/an Forests +0.5%/an forêt 26% 26% -0.7%/an -0.7%/an espaces Mixed hétérogènes 13% 13% prairies Grasslands 16% 16% 3

  4. NEE= GPP + Reco Rauto aerial GPP Compounds of Interest Forest : aerial Structural C Grassland: Digestible C GPP = Rauto + BP + exudates + COV Compound of Interest Biomass Production Production Efficiency Efficiency CIP + ( réserves, SS ,…) CIPE= CIBP/GPP BPE = BP/GPP Vicca et al. , 2012 Rhet soil Rauto soil aBPE (leaves, wood) bBPE (roots) 4

  5. • Only annual BPE/aBPE • Large variability in annual BPE/aBPE - Ecosystem type, Nutriments availability, Mean annual temperature, Specie, Age, Management, [CO 2 ] ⇛ Seasonal variability of aBPE ? Which drivers ? ⇛ Comparing aBPE evolutions of Forest vs Grassland Same meteo and soil 5

  6. MATERIAL ET METHOD 29/06/2016 6

  7. Sites Forest Grassland • Type of soil: calcisol (7.1 <pH<8) • Beech (88%) stand ~55 ans • Vegetation: Bromus hordaceus (53.8%), Bellis perennis (16.8%) • Soil type: calcisol (7.1 <pH<8) Dates Event • Stem density: 800 stems/ha 30/03/2014 Fertilization (NPK) • Height: 20-25m 13/04/2014 Grazing (Part 1) • LAI = 8 05/06/2014 Mowing (Part 2) 12/07/2014 Grazing (Part 1 +2) 29/06/2016 7

  8. CO 2 Flux and weather measurements • « Traditional » equipment with LI-7200 enclosed • Data processing : Frequency correction (Fratini); Flux quality selection (Mauder, u*threshold), Gapfilling & Partitioning (Reinschtein) 29/06/2016 8

  9. Biomass measurements Litter traps Dendrometers Cages excluding grazing x 10 = 0.64 m² dispatched randomly on the 5.1ha 80 cm 80 cm Allometric equations fitted on Lab analyses Dates Sampling the site (diameter, age, height) of collected 23/02/2014 Cleaning 1 litter for C Lab analyses of wood micro-cores 16/04/2014 Growth 1 (Cleaning 2) content for wood density and C content 23/05/2014 Growth 2 (Cleaning 3) 05/06/2014 Cleaning 4 24/07/2014 Growth 3 (Cleaning 5) 11/09/2014 Growth 4 (Cleaning 6) 06/11/2014 Growth 5 Lab analyses of cleaning Lab Biochemical analyses for biomass for C content (non-) structural C 9

  10. RESULTS 10

  11. -549gC m -2 NEE= 1089 gC m -2 GPP + Reco -1639 gC m -2 GPP Rauto aerial GPP = Rauto + BP + exudates aBPE aBP + COV 652 gC m -2 0.39 CIP + ( réserves, SS ,…) Rhet soil Rauto soil 11

  12. -484 gC m -2 -549gC m -2 NEE= GPP + Reco -1538 gC m -2 1054 gC m -2 1089 gC m -2 -1639 gC m -2 aBPE aBP 400 gC m -2 GPP 0.25 Reco 652 gC m -2 0.39 1. Forest : more assimilated C dedicated to GPP = Rauto + BP + exudates aboveground biomass + COV 2. Grassland : Belowground or Rauto ? (soil 12 ingrowth cores)

  13. Intra-annual variability (Forest) 7.0 Aboveground wBP (gC.m -2 .d -1 ) aBP 6.0 5.0 aBP - d fixed 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 10.04-05.05 06.05-02.06 03.06-30.06 01.07-28.07 29.07-25.08 26.08-22.09 22.09-23.11 1. Density correction up to 22% 2. Can’t be neglected for studies on C allocation seasonal variability 13

  14. Intra-annual variability (Forest) GPP 1. Large intra-annual variability 400 aBP bois 350 aBP feuille C content (gC/m²) 2. No apparent influence of meteo or soil 300 250 conditions 200 150 3. Seasonal bell-shaped phenology similar to the 100 photoperiod 50 0 Septembre Août Octobre Avril- Mai Juillet Juin 1.20 1 aBPE 1.00 0.80 0.55 0.60 0.46 0.32 0.31 0.40 0.20 0.07 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6

  15. Intra-annual variability (Grassland) 0.60 0.50 0.40 aBPE 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 22/02-16/04 17/04-23/05 05/06-24/07 25/07-11/09 12/09-06/11 Fertilization Grazing Mowing Management: 1. Larger variability ⇔ forest 2. Impact of mowing ? 15

  16. 0.7 NSC 0.6 C_Cel+L 0.5 Production efficiency C_Hem 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 October- April Mai June July August Sept November 16

  17. TAKE HOME MESSAGE 17

  18. • Forest allocated larger % of GPP to aboveground • Large aBPE seasonal variability (larger on grassland) • Forest : continuous curve ⇔ Grassland : impact of mowing • Temporal evolution of the reserve/wood formation strategy Thank 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend