Probing physics behind the electroweak symmetry breaking at future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

probing physics behind the electroweak symmetry breaking
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Probing physics behind the electroweak symmetry breaking at future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Probing physics behind the electroweak symmetry breaking at future gravitational wave and collider experiments Mitsuru Kakizaki (University of Toyama) The 17 th Regular Meeting of the New Higgs Working Group May 12, 2016 @ University of Toyama l


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Probing physics behind the electroweak symmetry breaking at future gravitational wave and collider experiments

Mitsuru Kakizaki (University of Toyama)

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 1 l Collaborators:

Katsuya Hashino, Shinya Kanemura (University of Toyama) and Toshinori Matsui (University of Toyama à KIAS)

l References:

  • MK, Kanemura, Matsui, PRD 92, no. 11, 115007 (2015) [arXiv:1509.08394]
  • Hashino, MK, Kanemura, Matsui, arXiv:1604.02069

The 17th Regular Meeting of the New Higgs Working Group May 12, 2016 @ University of Toyama

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Models with additional singlet scalars (without CSI)
  • 3. CSI models with additional singlet scalars
  • 4. Synergy between measurements of gravitational waves

and triple Higgs boson coupling

  • 5. Summary

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 3

l The Higgs sector is still vague:

l

Guiding principle?

l

Shape of the Higgs potential (multiplets, symmetries, ...)?

l Dynamics behind the electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB)?

l Higgs sector = Window to New Physics

Informa8on on new physics can be obtained by inves8ga8ng the proper8es of the Higgs sector

l Discovery of the 125 GeV Higgs boson at the CERN LHC: l The Standard Model (SM) has been established

as a low-energy effective theory below GeV This is not the end of the story

h

l Phenomena beyond the SM (BSM) reported:

l

Baryon asymmetry of the Universe (BAU)

l Existence of dark matter l Cosmic inflation l Neutrino oscillations

O(100)

l The structure of the Higgs sector is related to BSM models

slide-4
SLIDE 4

l Electroweak phase transition (EWPT) is NOT of 1st

  • rder for

Electroweak baryogenesis

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 4

1st OPT

l Sakharov’s conditions for BAU

  • 1. Baryon number violation
  • 2. Violation of C and CP
  • 3. Departure from thermal equilibrium

Sphaleron process Extended Higgs sctor Strongly first order phase transition (1st OPT):

Potential barrier

ϕ

ϕc

l SM Higgs sector w/ one doublet:

mh = 125 GeV

l Electroweak baryogenesis (EWBG) is an important physics

case relating the Higgs sector to BSM phenomena

True vacuum Tunneling

slide-5
SLIDE 5

l Condition for strongly 1st OPT:

Strongly 1st OPT and triple Higgs boson coupling

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 5

l e.g. Two Higgs doublet model (2HDM):

[Kanemura, Okada, Senaha (2005)]

Large deviation in the triple Higgs boson coupling

(∆λhhh/λSM

hhh & 10%)

EWBG can be tested at future colliders

l ILC 1 TeV can measure

at 10% accuracy

[Fujii et al. (2015)]

ϕc/Tc & 1

λhhh

l Models with extended Higgs sector: l 1st OPT is easily realized l Signatures are testable at colliders

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Gravitational waves (GWs) as a probe of EWPT

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 6

l Future space-based interferometers (eLISA, DECIGO, BBO) l Ground-based interferometers (aLIGO, KAGRA, aVirgo) l To investigate testability of models of EWSB

using the synergy between the measurements

  • f the GWs and the coupling

l Sensitive to GWs from the early Universe

(Strongly 1st OPT, cosmic inflation, ...)

[LIGO and Virgo (2016)]

l Goal of our work:

New era of GW astronomy

l Targets: GWs from binary systems, supernovae, ...

New era for fundamental physics

l To exemplify this using models with additional isospin singlet

scalars with and without classical scale invariance (CSI)

GWs Higgs sector BAU BSM

l aLIGO made the first direct observation of GWs

Synopsis

hhh hhh

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Models with additional singlet scalars (without CSI)
  • 3. CSI models with additional singlet scalars
  • 4. Synergy between measurements of gravitational waves

and triple Higgs boson coupling

  • 5. Summary

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Models with additional singlet scalars (without CSI)

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 8

l Tree-level scalar potential: l Idea:

[MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2015)]

l To generally handle strongly 1st OPT via thermal loop,

isosinglet scalars are introduced

l For simplicity, symmetry is imposed

O(N)

N

Si (i = 1, · · · , N)

Φ : SM Higgs doublet

l Singlet scalar boson mass: l Undetermined parameters:

µS, mS for each model

O(N)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Models with additional singlet scalars (without CSI) (contd.)

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 9

l Finite temperature effective potential

(high temperature expansion):

l Effective potential:

[MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2015)] Non decoupling loop effect from additional scalars

ϕc/Tc

Typically deviation in for strongly 1st OPT

λhhh

O(10)%

ϕc Tc ∝

Non decoupling loop effect from additional scalars

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Models with additional singlet scalars (without CSI)
  • 3. CSI models with additional singlet scalars
  • 4. Synergy between measurements of gravitational waves

and triple Higgs boson coupling

  • 5. Summary

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CSI models with additional singlet scalars

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI

l Tree-level potential: l Idea:

[Hashino, Kanemura, Orikasa (2015)]

l Mass parameters are absent in the original Lagrangian

due to CSI

l EWPT is directly caused by thermal loop effects

Φ: SM Higgs doublet

l Singlet scalar boson mass: l Triple Higgs boson coupling:

[Hashino, MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2015)] See Hashino’s talk

ϕc/Tc

[Hashino, Kanemura, Orikasa (2015)] independent of N [Bardeen (1995)]

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Models with additional singlet scalars (without CSI)
  • 3. CSI models with additional singlet scalars
  • 4. Synergy between measurements of gravitational waves

and triple Higgs boson coupling

  • 5. Summary

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Important quantities for GW spectrum

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 13

l Parameter l Transition temperature :

Tt

α

Released false vacuum energy (Latent heat)

'

l Parameter

' Inverse of the duration of phase transition

β(˜

β)

l Bubble nucleation rate per unit volume per unit time:

φ = 0 φ = 0 φ ≠ 0

l

GW spectrum is derived from finite temperature effective potential

Bubble nucleation Bubbles collision

  • 1. Collision of walls
  • 2. Compression wave of plasma
  • 3. Plasma turbulence

l

Sources of GWs: Veff

See Jinno and Takimoto’s talk

slide-14
SLIDE 14

l In CSI models,

scale invariance is violated at finite temperatures Constraints on and for each model

Predicted values of and

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 14

[Hashino, MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2016)] CSI models

O(N)

O(N)

models without CSI

Γ H4

  • T =Tt

= 1

ϕc Tc = 1

l and to be determined

by GW observation are useful measures in probing extended scalar sectors

l Condition for strongly 1st OPT

α

α

˜ β

˜ β

O(N)

and depend on though is common

α

˜ β

N

λhhh

α ˜ β

slide-15
SLIDE 15

l and : efficiency factors

Characteristic relic abundance and frequency of GWs

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 15

l Sound waves (Compression waves of thermal plasma): l Collision of walls (Envelope approximation):

[Caprini et al. (2015)]

l Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence:

vb

l : wall velocity

✏ = 0.05 κ = κ(α, vb)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

GW spectrum in CSI models

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 16

[Hashino, MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2016)]

O(N)

vb = 0.95

eLISA DECIGO

l Sound wave: l MHD Turbulence: l Collision:

N = 1, 4, 12, 60

l Benchmark points:

from the bottom

l Contribution from sound waves is dominant and detectable

at future space-based interferometers, eLISA and DECIGO

l Contribution to GWs: l Experimental prospects:

l eLISA: l DECIGO:

[Caprini et al. (2015)] [Kawamura et al. (2011)]

slide-17
SLIDE 17

l models

without CSI

Comparison of GW spectra

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 17

[Hashino, MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2016)]

O(N)

l CSI

models

O(N)

vb = 0.95

vb = 0.2

q µ2

S = 0

l N.B. subsonic wall

velocity is preferred for EWBG but not necessarily [No (2011)]

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Synergy of measurements of the triple Higgs boson coupling and GWs

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 18

l Models with and without CSI

can be distinguished at future GW interferometers even if they share common coupling

[Hashino, MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2016)]

l What if the coupling

is found to be at future colliders?

hhh

∆λhhh/λSM

hhh = 2/3(' 70%)

hhh

O(N)

l models without CSI predicting l CSI models

O(N)

∆λhhh/λSM

hhh = 2/3(' 70%) l Models:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Transition temperature and wall velocity dependence of detectability of GWs

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 19

Tt = 50 GeV Tt = 100 GeV vb = 0.2

vb = 0.95

[Hashino, MK, Kanemura, Matsui (2016)]

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 5. Summary

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 20

l We have discussed the

complementarity of measurements

  • f the triple Higgs boson coupling

and GW spectrum in models with extra scalars with and without CSI

l Synergy between observation of GWs and measurement

  • f the triple Higgs boson coupling at future experiments is

powerful in revealing dynamics behind the EWSB

l Models with strongly 1st order

EWPT predict large deviation in the triple Higgs boson coupling and generate GWs

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Backup slides

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Efficiency factor

May 12, 2016 Mitsuru KAKIZAKI 23

κ

[Caprini et al (2015)]