Bachelor of Education (Teaching) Primary Specialisation Practicum Courses:
EDPRAC 101 EDPRAC 201 EDPRAC 305
Visiting Lecturer School coordinator/Associate Teacher Meetings May 2012
Vivienne Mackisack Jill Murray Sandra Chandler
Primary Specialisation Practicum Courses: EDPRAC 101 EDPRAC 201 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Bachelor of Education (Teaching) Primary Specialisation Practicum Courses: EDPRAC 101 EDPRAC 201 EDPRAC 305 Visiting Lecturer School coordinator/Associate Teacher Meetings May 2012 Vivienne Mackisack Jill Murray Sandra Chandler
Vivienne Mackisack Jill Murray Sandra Chandler
courses)
teacher professional learning
* Burning questions
Both nationally and internationally there are common themes in the critique of Initial Teacher Education and the place of practicum within it:
time teaching”
increasing teacher quality to raise student achievement”
“Zeichner (1982) argued that it is not time in schools per se, but the quality of the experience that is critical for student teacher learning” (Grudnoff and Williams, 2010).
As they develop their expertise, novice teachers shift their vision from a focus on themselves to the class and to an awareness of the needs of the individual students who make up the class.
Eckerman Pitton, 2006, p.38
Vision of individual students: ‘ Did Shawna understand?’ ‘Was Matt with it today?’ ‘What will help Laura be successful?’ Vision of the class as a whole: ‘How did the students do?’ ‘Did they all learn it?’ ‘What will make the lesson better?’ Vision of self: ‘How am I doing?’ ‘Did I get it right?’ ‘Am I a good teacher?’
Our collective role is to support student teachers to:
“The practicum for a student teacher will operate as a partnership between the teacher education provider and a fully registered associate teacher” (New Zealand Teachers Council, 2010, p.13).
(Faculty of Education, Teacher Education Practice website, 2012).
(Aitken & Sinnema, 2008; Ministry of Education,2007; Timperley, Wilson, Barrar, & Fung, 2007)
FOCUSING INQUIRY What is most important, given where my learn[ing[ is at? TEACHING INQUIRY What strategies might work best? What could I try? LEARNING INQUIRY What happened? Why did it happen? Implications? Planning Teaching Observation* Assessment* Evaluation of learning/teaching Reflection
* ongoing
The framework: “Teaching as inquiry” cont...
(Aitken & Sinnema, 2008; Ministry of Education,2007; Timperley, Wilson, Barrar, & Fung, 2007)
What [teaching] strategies work best? What could I try?
Preparing beginning teachers who are ready to develop as:
“effective teachers… reflect on the impact their teaching has on learning….ability to teach at particular levels….relationships …. enthusiastic learners….collegial and co-operative …. initiative, imagination, and innovation…. accept advice and know when to ask for it”
(MOE &NZTC, 2011).
…research-informed inquiry-based practitioners
Assessment, Planning, Teaching Reflection, Professional Learning Relationships, Professional Identity Observation
planning and teaching
Student teachers are required to demonstrate their ability to take full- class responsibility for 1-2 days during EDPRAC 101. This may be in collaboration with their associate teacher. It is important to record a student teacher’s level of ability to assume this responsibility on their practicum reports. Student teachers are required to demonstrate their ability to take full- class responsibility for 7 consecutive days during EDPRAC 201. The ability to demonstrate this level of proficiency is a critical indicator that a student teacher is ready to progress to EDPRAC 305.
The ability to demonstrate practice reflective of an emerging beginning teacher as they conclude EDPRAC 305 is a critical indicator that a student teacher is ready to graduate.
Aitken, G., & Sinnema, C. (2008). Effective pedagogy in Social Sciences? Tikanga a iwi: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Aitken, G., Cochrane-Smith, M., Ell, F ., & Grudnoff, L. (2012). Reinventing (university) teacher education: Connections, context and consequences. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J.D. & Pellegrino, J.W. (1999). How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Eckerman Pitton, D. (2006). Mentoring Novice Teachers: Fostering a dialogue process. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Corwin Press. Education Workforce Advisory Group. (2010). A Vision for the Teaching Profession. Wellington: New Zealand Government Retrieved from http://www.beehive. govt.nz/sites/all/files/10.pdf. Grudnoff, L., & Williams, R. (2010). Pushing Boundaries: Reworking University–School Practicum Relationships. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies.(45)2, 33-45. Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Brindley, S. (2008). Practice makes perfect? Learning to learn as a teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 34(2), 159-178. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media. New Zealand Teachers Council. (2010). Approval, Review and Monitoring Processes and Requirements for Initial Teacher Education Programmes. Wellington: Author Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Zeichner, K. (2011). Improving Teacher Education in the United States. Commissioned essay, for the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver